Exploring eco-pedagogical practices in early Childhood education: Teachers’ voices on project-based deep learning pedagogy

Authors

  • Melati Puspitajati Adikusuma Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Imam Machali Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Ega Asnatasia Maharani Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/jecce.v9i2.17710

Keywords:

deep learning pedagogy, early childhood education, eco-pedagogy, teacher professional development

Abstract

Purpose
This study explores how early childhood education teachers understand and implement project-based deep learning as a pedagogical approach informed by eco-pedagogical principles in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia.

Design/methods/approach
A qualitative multiple-case study was conducted across three early childhood education (PAUD) institutions in Batui District, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, involving six teachers and three principals. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis. The data were analyzed thematically, followed by cross-case comparison to identify shared patterns and contextual differences.

Findings
Across the three cases, teachers recognized the value of experiential and contextual learning with limited conceptual understanding of deep learning pedagogy and eco-pedagogy performance, particularly in translating these principles into classroom practices. Coastal resources, agricultural activities, and local cultural knowledge offered opportunities for meaningful environmental learning, yet their pedagogical integration varied according to teachers' planning capacity, confidence, and institutional support. Although teachers increasingly adopted facilitative roles, implementation remained constrained by safety considerations, limited time, and insufficient practice-oriented professional development.

Research implications/limitations
The findings are based on three PAUD institutions within a single district, limiting their transferability to other educational and geographical contexts. Further research across more diverse settings is needed to examine how institutional and ecological conditions shape eco-pedagogical practices.

Practical implications
The findings underscore the need for sustained, practice-oriented teacher professional development, collaborative instructional planning, and stronger school–family–community partnerships to support the integration of local ecological and cultural resources into meaningful learning experiences.

Originality/value
This study identifies an environmental affordance–pedagogical enactment gap, referring to the discrepancy between the learning opportunities provided by local ecological and cultural environments and teachers' capacity to translate these opportunities into intentional pedagogical practices. The cross-case findings suggest that the presence of environmental resources alone is insufficient to ensure ecopedagogical implementation; rather, their educational value depends on teachers' pedagogical understanding, instructional planning, and institutional support. This provides an empirically grounded perspective on project-based deep learning pedagogy as a contextually situated educational practice.

References

Ardoin, N. M., & Bowers, A. W. (2020). Early childhood environmental education: A systematic review of the research literature. Educational Research Review, 31, 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100353

Bascopé, M., Perasso, P., & Reiss, K. (2019). Systematic Review of Education for Sustainable Development at an Early Stage: Cornerstones and Pedagogical Approaches for Teacher Professional Development. Sustainability, 11(3), 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030719

Chawla, L. (2020). Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss. People and Nature, 2(3), 619–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10128

Collins, S., & Garrity, S. (2025). Early childhood educators’ understanding of education for sustainable development. Irish Educational Studies, 44(2), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2266688

Davis, J., & Elliott, S. (2014). Research in Early Childhood Education for Sustainability: International perspectives and provocations. Routledge & CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315767499

Davis, J. M. (2010). Young Children and the Environment: Early Education for Sustainability. In Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1035077200001176

Dyment, J. E., Davis, J. M., Nailon, D., Emery, S., Getenet, S., McCrea, N., & Hill, A. (2014). The impact of professional development on early childhood educators’ confidence, understanding and knowledge of education for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 20(5), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.833591

Elliott, S., & Davis, J. M. (2018). Challenging Taken-for-Granted Ideas in Early Childhood Education: A Critique of Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory in the Age of Post-humanism. In Research Handbook on Childhoodnature (pp. 1–36). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67286-1_60

Engdahl, I., Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E. (2023). Systematic Child Talks in Early Childhood Education—A Method for Sustainability. Children, 10(4), 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040661

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A Rich Seam: How New Pedagogies Find Deep Learning. Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2015.1073331

Gadotti, M. (2008). Education for Sustainability: A Critical Contribution to the Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Green Theory & Praxis The Journal of Ecopedagogy, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.3903/gtp.2008.1.3

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.

Gül, M. R., & Güler Yıldız, T. (2026). Preschool Teachers’ Sustainability Literacy and Perspectives on Education for Sustainability: A Mixed Methods Study. Theory and Practice in Child Development, 6(1), 174–201. https://doi.org/10.46303/tpicd.2026.9

Kahn, R. (2010). Critical Pedagogy, Ecoliteracy, and Planetary Crisis. Peter Lang.

Kahriman Pamuk, D., Öztürk, N., Koşan, Y., Pamuk, S., Güler Yıldız, T., Elmas, R., & Haktanır, G. (2026). Sustainability Literate Preschool Teachers: Exploring Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices in Early Childhood Education for Sustainability—A Quantitative Model. European Journal of Education, 61(1), e70443. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70443

Karim, F. A., Marfuah, J., & Asrianti. (2022). The Local Wisdom of ‘Malabot Tumbe’: A Community Ritual in Banggai District. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(1), 5140–5145. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v6i2.2599

Katz, L. G., & Chard, S. C. (2000). Engaging Children’s Minds The Project Approach (2nd edn). Ablex Publishing Group. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1771170

Krajcik, J., Schneider, B., Miller, E. A., Chen, I.-C., Bradford, L., Baker, Q., Bartz, K., Miller, C., Li, T., Codere, S., & Peek-Brown, D. (2023). Assessing the Effect of Project-Based Learning on Science Learning in Elementary Schools. American Educational Research Journal, 60(1), 70–102. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312221129247

Kurniati, E. (2025). Teori sosiokultural Vygotsky untuk anak usia dini. Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 1(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i2.1026

Lahe, K., Mikser, R., Tuul, M., & Kikas, E. (2026). Clarifying Project-Based Learning in Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Early Childhood Education Journal, 54(7), 5985–5997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-026-02274-w

NAEYC. (2020). Developmentally Appropriate Practice National Association for the Education of Young Children. NAEYC.

Pratiwi, N., Melihayatri, N., Eriani, E., & Mastuinda. (2025). Implementasi Metode Pembelajaran Project Base Learning Dalam Kegiatan Pembelajaran Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Kiprah Pendidikan, 4(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.33578/kpd.v4i1.p42-51

Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474219426

Rohmah, R. A., Mahdum, M., & Isjoni, I. (2023). Pandangan Filsafat Progresivisme John Dewey Pada Pembelajaran Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka: Kajian studi literatur review. Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.32806/jkpi.v4i1.328

Sari, M., Effendie, R., & Sakerani, S. (2025). Implementasi Ekoliterasi Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. JEA (Jurnal Edukasi AUD), 11(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.18592/jea.v11i1.15218

Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, Deborah. S. (2000). From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. National Academy Press.

Sobel, D. (2005). Place-Based Education: Connecting Classrooms and Communities. Faculty Book Gallery. https://aura.antioch.edu/facbooks/44

Yafie, E., Atmoko, A., Sari, Z. N., Ashari, R., & Samah, N. A. (2026). Developing and Piloting the DEEP-ECE Model for Early Childhood Educators: A Professional Development Framework for Reflective Practice and Pedagogical Competence. Golden Age: Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 11(2), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.14421/jga.2026.112-05

Published

2026-10-28

How to Cite

Puspitajati Adikusuma, M., Machali, I. ., & Maharani, E. A. . (2026). Exploring eco-pedagogical practices in early Childhood education: Teachers’ voices on project-based deep learning pedagogy. JECCE (Journal of Early Childhood Care and Education), 9(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.26555/jecce.v9i2.17710