Deep Learning Approaches for Water Quality Prediction in Aquaponics Systems: A Comparative Study of Recurrent and Feedforward Architectures

Authors

  • Gregorius Airlangga Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya
  • Oskar Ika Adi Nugroho National Chung Cheng University
  • Lai Ferry Sugianto Fujen Catholic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/biste.v7i1.12411

Keywords:

Aquaponics Systems, Water Quality Prediction, Deep Learning Models, Time-Series Forecasting, LSTM and GRU Models

Abstract

Accurate prediction of water quality parameters is critical for the effective management and sustainability of aquaponics systems. This study evaluates the performance of four deep learning architectures: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Simple Recurrent Neural Network (SimpleRNN), and Dense Neural Network (DenseNN) for forecasting key water quality parameters, including temperature, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, pH, ammonia, and nitrate. A significant research gap is addressed by analyzing how these models perform on noisy and minimally preprocessed datasets, advancing prior studies that lack robust preprocessing techniques tailored for aquaponics systems. A ten-fold cross-validation framework was employed to rigorously assess the models, with Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) as evaluation metrics. The results demonstrate that LSTM and GRU models outperform other architectures, achieving average validation losses of 0.0028 and 0.0028, respectively, and mean absolute errors of 0.0473 and 0.0478. These models effectively capture the temporal dependencies inherent in time-series data, making them highly suitable for the complex dynamics of aquaponics systems. Unlike previous studies, this research highlights the trade-offs between computational efficiency and predictive accuracy in these models. In contrast, the SimpleRNN model exhibited higher error rates due to its inability to model long-term dependencies, while the DenseNN model, lacking temporal processing mechanisms, showed the lowest performance with an average validation loss of 0.0075 and MAE of 0.0797. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate model architectures for time-series forecasting tasks and provides a foundation for deploying predictive systems to optimize aquaponics operations. Future work includes exploring hybrid models with attention mechanisms and real-time data integration for enhanced operational efficiency.

References

L. A. Ibrahim, H. Shaghaleh, G. M. El-Kassar, M. Abu-Hashim, E. A. Elsadek, and Y. Alhaj Hamoud, “Aquaponics: a sustainable path to food sovereignty and enhanced water use efficiency,” Water, vol. 15, no. 24, p. 4310, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/w15244310.

B. Yep and Y. Zheng, “Aquaponic trends and challenges--A review,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 228, pp. 1586–1599, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.290.

M. Schoor, A. P. Arenas-Salazar, I. Torres-Pacheco, R. G. Guevara-González, and E. Rico-Garcia, “A review of sustainable pillars and their fulfillment in Agriculture, aquaculture, and Aquaponic Production,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 7638, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097638.

A. R. Yanes, P. Martinez, and R. Ahmad, “Towards automated aquaponics: A review on monitoring, IoT, and smart systems,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 263, p. 121571, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121571.

P. Debroy, P. Majumder, and L. Seban, “A simulation based water quality parameter control of aquaponic system employing model predictive control strategy incorporation with optimization technique,” Environ. Prog. & Sustain. Energy, p. e14530, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.14530.

P. Chandramenon, A. Aggoun, and F. Tchuenbou-Magaia, “Smart approaches to Aquaponics 4.0 with focus on water quality- Comprehensive review,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 225, p. 109256, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109256.

A. B. Dauda, “Biofloc technology: a review on the microbial interactions, operational parameters and implications to disease and health management of cultured aquatic animals,” Rev. Aquac., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1193–1210, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12379.

M. J. Islam, A. Kunzmann, and M. J. Slater, “Responses of aquaculture fish to climate change-induced extreme temperatures: A review,” J. World Aquac. Soc., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 314–366, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12853.

A. K. Verma, M. H. Chandrakant, V. C. John, R. M. Peter, and I. E. John, “Aquaponics as an integrated agri-aquaculture system (IAAS): Emerging trends and future prospects,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 194, p. 122709, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122709.

T. Malmir. System Dynamics Modeling of the Food-Water-Energy Nexus in Urban Areas, Focusing on Community Gardens. Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2023, https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/992768/.

Z. Schmautz. Characterization of nitrogen dynamics in an aquaponic system. (Doctoral dissertation, ETH Zurich), 2020, https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/464851.

A. Kobelski, P. Nestler, M. Mauerer, T. Rocksch, U. Schmidt, and S. Streif, “An Algorithm for Nutrient Mixing Optimization in Aquaponics,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 18, p. 8140, 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188140.

K. Kazimierczuk, S. E. Barrows, M. V Olarte, and N. P. Qafoku, “Decarbonization of Agriculture: The Greenhouse Gas Impacts and Economics of Existing and Emerging Climate-Smart Practices,” ACS Eng. Au, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 426–442, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsengineeringau.3c00031.

J. Gladju, B. S. Kamalam, and A. Kanagaraj, “Applications of data mining and machine learning framework in aquaculture and fisheries: A review,” Smart Agric. Technol., vol. 2, p. 100061, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100061.

A. Khandakar et al., “Smart aquaponics: An innovative machine learning framework for fish farming optimization,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 119, p. 109590, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109590.

A. E. Alprol, A. T. Mansour, M. E. E.-D. Ibrahim, and M. Ashour, “Artificial Intelligence Technologies Revolutionizing Wastewater Treatment: Current Trends and Future Prospective,” Water, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 314, 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/w16020314.

J. Liu, C. Zhang, D. An, and Y. Wei, “Development and application of an innovative dissolved oxygen prediction fusion model,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 227, p. 109496, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109496.

W. Li, H. Wu, N. Zhu, Y. Jiang, J. Tan, and Y. Guo, “Prediction of dissolved oxygen in a fishery pond based on gated recurrent unit (GRU),” Inf. Process. Agric., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 185–193, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2020.02.002.

M. A. Jabed and M. A. A. Murad, “Crop Yield Prediction in Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches, with Insights for Future Research and Sustainability,” Heliyon, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40836.

T. Van Klompenburg, A. Kassahun, and C. Catal, “Crop yield prediction using machine learning: A systematic literature review,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 177, p. 105709, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105709.

A. Metin, A. Kasif, and C. Catal, “Temporal fusion transformer-based prediction in aquaponics,” J. Supercomput., vol. 79, no. 17, pp. 19934–19958, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05389-8.

J. Liu and W. Jiang, “Optimization of Aquaponics System Efficiency based on Artificial Intelligence Approach,” in 2024 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Computing and Machine Intelligence (ICMI), pp. 1–6, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMI60790.2024.10586162.

S. B. Dhal et al., “A machine-learning-based IoT system for optimizing nutrient supply in commercial aquaponic operations,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 9, p. 3510, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093510.

S. Kanwal et al., “An Optimal Internet of Things-Driven Intelligent Decision-Making System for Real-Time Fishpond Water Quality Monitoring and Species Survival,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 23, p. 7842, 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/s24237842.

M. A. Rahu, A. F. Chandio, K. Aurangzeb, S. Karim, M. Alhussein and M. S. Anwar, "Toward Design of Internet of Things and Machine Learning-Enabled Frameworks for Analysis and Prediction of Water Quality," in IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 101055-101086, 2023,, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3315649.

S. Fetouh, “Cleaned Aquaponics Pond Dataset.” Kaggle, 2024, https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/samahfetouh/cleaned-aquaponics-pond-dataset.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-13

How to Cite

[1]
G. Airlangga, O. I. A. Nugroho, and L. F. Sugianto, “Deep Learning Approaches for Water Quality Prediction in Aquaponics Systems: A Comparative Study of Recurrent and Feedforward Architectures”, Buletin Ilmiah Sarjana Teknik Elektro, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 01–08, Jan. 2025.

Issue

Section

Artikel

Most read articles by the same author(s)