Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Tree Species Classification from UAV LiDAR Data

Authors

  • Gregorius Airlangga Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/biste.v6i1.10059

Keywords:

UAV LiDAR Data, Tree Species Classification, Machine Learning, Remote Sensing, Forest Biodiversity

Abstract

Forest ecosystems play a pivotal role in maintaining global biodiversity and climate balance. The precise identification of tree species via remote sensing technologies is vital for effective ecological surveillance and forest stewardship. This research conducts a comparative analysis of various machine learning algorithms for the binary classification of tree species utilizing LiDAR data captured by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). We analyzed a dataset featuring 192 trees from a diverse forest, employing models such as Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Gradient Boosting, and Decision Trees. These models were assessed on their accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-scores to ascertain their efficacy. Our findings reveal that Logistic Regression and SVM were superior, achieving precision and recall scores up to 0.96, indicating their robust predictive capability. In contrast, KNN underperformed, suggesting the need for parameter refinement. Although ensemble methods demonstrated resilience, they were more prone to overfitting in comparison to the more straightforward Logistic Regression and SVM models. Preliminary data preprocessing and feature engineering techniques are discussed, enhancing the models' performance. This work enriches the domain of remote sensing and ecological monitoring by offering an in-depth evaluation of machine learning models for tree species classification, underscoring their advantages and constraints. It underscores the transformative potential of machine learning in refining ecological analysis precision, thereby aiding in the pursuit of sustainable forest management. Future research directions could include model refinement through advanced feature selection or the exploration of novel machine learning algorithms for improved classification accuracy.

References

A. Ameray, Y. Bergeron, O. Valeria, M. Montoro Girona, and X. Cavard, “Forest carbon management: A review of silvicultural practices and management strategies across boreal, temperate and tropical forests,” Curr. For. Reports, pp. 1–22, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-021-00151-w.

P. Biber et al., “Forest biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and wood production: modeling synergies and trade-offs for ten forest landscapes across Europe,” Front. Ecol. Evol., vol. 8, p. 547696, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.547696.

A. Raj et al., “Forest Biodiversity Conservation and Restoration: Policies, Plan, and Approaches,” Ecorestoration Sustain., pp. 317–350, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119879954.ch10.

A. Wijerathna-Yapa and R. Pathirana, “Sustainable Agro-Food Systems for Addressing Climate Change and Food Security,” Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1554, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101554.

S. E. Bibri, J. Krogstie, A. Kaboli, and A. Alahi, “Smarter eco-cities and their leading-edge artificial intelligence of things solutions for environmental sustainability: A comprehensive systematic review,” Environ. Sci. Ecotechnology, vol. 19, p. 100330, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2023.100330.

S. E. Andres, et al., “Defining biodiverse reforestation: Why it matters for climate change mitigation and biodiversity,” Plants, People, Planet, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 27-38, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10329.

X. Liang et al., “Close-Range Remote Sensing of Forests: The state of the art, challenges, and opportunities for systems and data acquisitions,” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 32–71, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2022.3168135.

M. W. Rhodes, J. J. Bennie, A. Spalding, R. H. ffrench-Constant, and I. M. D. Maclean, “Recent advances in the remote sensing of insects,” Biol. Rev., vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 343–360, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12802.

D. Xu, H. Wang, W. Xu, Z. Luan, and X. Xu, “LiDAR applications to estimate forest biomass at individual tree scale: Opportunities, challenges and future perspectives,” Forests, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 550, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/f12050550.

M. Hirschmugl, C. Sobe, A. Di Filippo, V. Berger, H. Kirchmeir, and K. Vandekerkhove, “Review on the Possibilities of Mapping Old-Growth Temperate Forests by Remote Sensing in Europe,” Environmental Modeling & Assessment, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 761-785, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-023-09897-y.

K. Hwang et al., “Seeing the disturbed forest for the trees: Remote sensing is underutilized to quantify critical zone response to unprecedented disturbance,” Earth’s Futur., vol. 11, no. 8, p. e2022EF003314, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003314.

S. Ecke et al., “UAV-based forest health monitoring: A systematic review,” Remote Sens., vol. 14, no. 13, p. 3205, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14133205.

A. Shyrokaya et al., “Advances and gaps in the science and practice of impact-based forecasting of droughts,” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water, p. e1698, 2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2023-609.

Y. K. Dwivedi et al., ““Real impact”: Challenges and opportunities in bridging the gap between research and practice–Making a difference in industry, policy, and society,” International Journal of Information Management, p. 102750, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102750.

N. Camarretta et al., “Monitoring forest structure to guide adaptive management of forest restoration: a review of remote sensing approaches,” New Forests, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 573-596, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09754-5.

C. T. de Almeida et al., “Combining LiDAR and hyperspectral data for aboveground biomass modeling in the Brazilian Amazon using different regression algorithms,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 232, p. 111323, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111323.

Q. Li, B. Hu, J. Shang, and H. Li, “Fusion Approaches to Individual Tree Species Classification Using Multisource Remote Sensing Data,” Forests, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 1392, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071392.

K. K. McLauchlan et al., “ Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers,” Journal of Ecology, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 2047–2069, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13403.

R. Pereira Martins-Neto, A. M. Garcia Tommaselli, N. N. Imai, E. Honkavaara, M. Miltiadou, E. A. Saito Moriya, and H. C. David, “Tree Species Classification in a Complex Brazilian Tropical Forest Using Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data,” Forests, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 945, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/f14050945.

I. Tsamardinos et al., “Just Add Data: automated predictive modeling for knowledge discovery and feature selection,” NPJ Precis. Oncol., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 38, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-022-00274-8.

Y. Shennan-Farpón, P. Visconti, and K. Norris, “Detecting ecological thresholds for biodiversity in tropical forests: Knowledge gaps and future directions,” Biotropica, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1276–1289, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12999.

R. Hologa, K. Scheffczyk, C. Dreiser, and S. Gärtner, “Tree species classification in a temperate mixed mountain forest landscape using random forest and multiple datasets,” Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 22, p. 4657, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224657.

D. Xia, J. Shi, K. Wan, J. Wan, M. Martínez-García and X. Guan, "Digital Twin and Artificial Intelligence for Intelligent Planning and Energy-Efficient Deployment of 6G Networks in Smart Factories," in IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 171-179, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.017.2200495.

I. Souiden, M. N. Omri, and Z. Brahmi, “A survey of outlier detection in high dimensional data streams,” Comput. Sci. Rev., vol. 44, p. 100463, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2022.100463.

V. A. Surdu and R. Győrgy, “X-ray diffraction data analysis by machine learning methods—a review,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 17, p. 9992, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179992.

I. Fayad et al., “Hy-TeC: a hybrid vision transformer model for high-resolution and large-scale mapping of canopy height,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 302, p. 113945, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113945.

R. Seidl and M. G. Turner, “Post-disturbance reorganization of forest ecosystems in a changing world,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 119, no. 28, p. e2202190119, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202190119.

M. Immitzer and C. Atzberger, “Tree Species Diversity Mapping—Success Stories and Possible Ways Forward,” Remote Sens., vol. 15, no. 12, p. 3074, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15123074.

A. Shaamala, T. Yigitcanlar, A. Nili, and D. Nyandega, “Algorithmic Green Infrastructure Optimisation: Review of Artificial Intelligence Driven Approaches for Tackling Climate Change,” Sustain. Cities Soc., p. 105182, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105182.

Y. Hao, F. R. A. Widagdo, X. Liu, Y. Liu, L. Dong and F. Li, "A Hierarchical Region-Merging Algorithm for 3-D Segmentation of Individual Trees Using UAV-LiDAR Point Clouds," in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1-16, no. 5701416, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3121419.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-12

How to Cite

[1]
G. Airlangga, “Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Tree Species Classification from UAV LiDAR Data”, Buletin Ilmiah Sarjana Teknik Elektro, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 54–62, Mar. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artikel