Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for UAV Network Performance Identification in Dynamic Environments

Authors

  • Gregorius Airlangga Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya
  • Oskar Ika Adi Nugroho National Chung Cheng University
  • Lai Ferry Sugianto Fujen Catholic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/biste.v6i4.12409

Keywords:

UAV Performance, Machine Learning Models, Ensemble Techniques, Dynamic Environments, Predictive Analytics

Abstract

The rapid integration of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) into critical applications such as disaster management, logistics, and communication networks has brought forth significant challenges in optimizing their performance under dynamic and unpredictable conditions. This study addresses these challenges by systematically evaluating the predictive capabilities of multiple machine learning models for UAV network performance identification. Models including RandomForest, GradientBoosting, Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), AdaBoost, ExtraTrees, LogisticRegression, and DecisionTree were analyzed using comprehensive metrics such as average accuracy, macro F1-score, macro precision, and macro recall. The results demonstrated the superiority of ensemble methods, with ExtraTrees achieving the highest performance across all metrics, including an accuracy of 0.9941. Other ensemble models, such as RandomForest and GradientBoosting, also showcased strong results, emphasizing their reliability in handling complex UAV datasets. In contrast, non-ensemble approaches such as LogisticRegression and MLP exhibited comparatively lower performance, suggesting their limitations in generalization under dynamic conditions. Preprocessing techniques, including SMOTE for addressing class imbalances, were applied to enhance model reliability. This research highlights the importance of ensemble learning techniques in achieving robust and balanced UAV performance predictions. The findings provide actionable insights into model selection and optimization strategies, bridging the gap between theoretical advancements and real-world UAV deployment. The proposed methodology and results have impact for advancing UAV technologies in critical, network performance-sensitive applications.

References

A. Khan, S. Gupta, and S. K. Gupta, “Emerging UAV technology for disaster detection, mitigation, response, and preparedness,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 905–955, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.22075.

S. A. H. Mohsan, M. A. Khan, F. Noor, I. Ullah, and M. H. Alsharif, “Towards the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): A comprehensive review,” Drones, vol. 6, no. 6, p. 147, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6060147.

F. Syed, S. K. Gupta, S. Hamood Alsamhi, M. Rashid, and X. Liu, “A survey on recent optimal techniques for securing unmanned aerial vehicles applications,” Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol., vol. 32, no. 7, p. e4133, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.4133.

Y. Bai, H. Zhao, X. Zhang, Z. Chang, R. Jäntti and K. Yang, "Toward Autonomous Multi-UAV Wireless Network: A Survey of Reinforcement Learning-Based Approaches," in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 3038-3067, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2023.3323344.

M. J. Sobouti, A. Mohajerzadeh, H. Y. Adarbah, Z. Rahimi, and H. Ahmadi, “Utilizing UAVs in wireless networks: advantages, challenges, objectives, and solution methods,” Vehicles, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1769–1800, 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles6040086.

X. Xu et al., “Optimization of reliable vehicle routing problem for medical waste collection with time windows in stochastic transportation networks,” Engineering Optimization, pp. 1–31, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2024.2388626.

M. Hooshyar and Y.-M. Huang, “Meta-heuristic algorithms in UAV path planning optimization: A systematic review (2018--2022),” Drones, vol. 7, no. 12, p. 687, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7120687.

S. H. Alsamhi et al., “UAV computing-assisted search and rescue mission framework for disaster and harsh environment mitigation,” Drones, vol. 6, no. 7, p. 154, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6070154.

S. R. Sabuj, A. Ahmed, Y. Cho, K.-J. Lee, and H.-S. Jo, “Cognitive UAV-aided URLLC and mMTC services: Analyzing energy efficiency and latency,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 5011–5027, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3048436.

M. S. Aslanpour, S. S. Gill, and A. N. Toosi, “Performance evaluation metrics for cloud, fog and edge computing: A review, taxonomy, benchmarks and standards for future research,” Internet of Things, vol. 12, p. 100273, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100273.

M. A. Sayeed, R. Kumar, V. Sharma, and M. A. Sayeed, “Efficient deployment with throughput maximization for UAVs communication networks,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 22, p. 6680, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226680.

S. Zeng, X.-J. Xiang, Y.-P. Dou, J.-C. Du, and G. He, “UAV data link anti-interference via SLHS-SVM-AdaBoost algorithm: Classification prediction and route planning,” J. Electron. Sci. Technol., vol. 22, no. 4, p. 100279, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlest.2024.100279.

Y. Liu, J. Yan and X. Zhao, "Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Latency Minimization for Mobile Edge Computing With Virtualization in Maritime UAV Communication Network," in IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 4225-4236, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2022.3141799.

S. Hu, J. Wang, C. Hoare, Y. Li, P. Pauwels, and J. O’Donnell, “Building energy performance assessment using linked data and cross-domain semantic reasoning,” Autom. Constr., vol. 124, p. 103580, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103580.

A. Telikani, A. Sarkar, B. Du and J. Shen, "Machine Learning for UAV-Aided ITS: A Review With Comparative Study," in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 15388-15406, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2024.3422039.

H H. Yuliana, Iskandar and Hendrawan, "Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for 5G Coverage Prediction: Identification of Dominant Feature Parameters and Prediction Accuracy," in IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 18939-18956, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3361403.

P. S. Bithas, E. T. Michailidis, N. Nomikos, D. Vouyioukas, and A. G. Kanatas, “A survey on machine-learning techniques for UAV-based communications,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 23, p. 5170, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19235170.

S. Abimannan, E. -S. M. El-Alfy, Y. -S. Chang, S. Hussain, S. Shukla and D. Satheesh, "Ensemble Multifeatured Deep Learning Models and Applications: A Survey," in IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 107194-107217, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3320042.

U. Seidaliyeva, L. Ilipbayeva, K. Taissariyeva, N. Smailov, and E. T. Matson, “Advances and challenges in drone detection and classification techniques: A state-of-the-art review,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 125, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010125.

E. Asamoah, G. B. M. Heuvelink, I. Chairi, P. S. Bindraban, and V. Logah, “Random forest machine learning for maize yield and agronomic efficiency prediction in Ghana,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 17, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37065.

A. R. Al-Aizari et al., “Uncertainty reduction in Flood susceptibility mapping using Random Forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithms in two Tropical Desert cities, Shibam and Marib, Yemen,” Remote Sens., vol. 16, no. 2, p. 336, 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020336.

M. Zou et al., “Combining spectral and texture feature of UAV image with plant height to improve LAI estimation of winter wheat at jointing stage,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 14, p. 1272049, 2024, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1272049.

A. Hussain, S. Li, T. Hussain, X. Lin, F. Ali, and A. A. AlZubi, “Computing Challenges of UAV Networks: A Comprehensive Survey.,” Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 81, no. 2, 2024, https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2024.056183.

R. A. Nihal, B. Yen, K. Itoyama, and K. Nakadai, “UAV-Enhanced Combination to Application: Comprehensive Analysis and Benchmarking of a Human Detection Dataset for Disaster Scenarios,” in International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 145–162, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78341-8_10.

W. Yang, A. Acuto, Y. Zhou, and D. Wojtczak, “A Survey for Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Network Intrusion Detection,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2410.07612, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.07612.

X. Lei et al., “An Ensemble Machine Learning Model to Estimate Urban Water Quality Parameters Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Multispectral Imagery,” Remote Sens., vol. 16, no. 12, p. 2246, 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122246.

F. Zhang et al., “Data preparation for deep learning based code smell detection: A systematic literature review,” J. Syst. Softw., p. 112131, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112131.

J. Eo, D. Lee and M. Kwon, "The Impact of Dataset on Offline Reinforcement Learning Performance in UAV-Based Emergency Network Recovery Tasks," in IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1058-1061, May 2024, https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2023.3339478.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-07

How to Cite

[1]
G. Airlangga, O. I. A. Nugroho, and L. F. Sugianto, “Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for UAV Network Performance Identification in Dynamic Environments”, Buletin Ilmiah Sarjana Teknik Elektro, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 357–365, Jan. 2025.

Issue

Section

Artikel

Most read articles by the same author(s)