Environmental ideology in WALHI’s ecological disaster press releases: An ecolinguistic analysis of Sumatra

Authors

  • Mimas Ardhianti Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Eko Cahyo Prawoto Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Antok Risaldi Universitas International Semen Indonesia, Gresik, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v8i1.15665

Keywords:

Ecolinguistics, Ecological Disaster, Environmental Ideology, Transitivity System, WALHI

Abstract

This study aims to uncover the environmental ideology embedded in WALHI’s ecological disaster press releases through transitivity analysis. The study employs a descriptive qualitative approach grounded in ecolinguistics within the framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). The data consist of press releases on ecological disasters in Sumatra published by Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia (WALHI). Data were collected through observation and documentation techniques. The collected data were analyzed in four stages: (1) clause segmentation and numbering; (2) identification and classification of process types; (3) identification of participant roles and circumstantial elements; and (4) interpretation of ideological patterns based on recurring configurations of processes and participants. The findings indicate that relational processes dominate the transitivity patterns, followed by material, existential, verbal, mental, and behavioral processes. The environmental ideologies identified in WALHI’s ecological disaster press releases include: (1) environmental ideology: those in power are responsible for environmental destruction; (2) environmental ideology: rejection of power practices in elite regulations; (3) environmental ideology: justice in resisting systems of power; (4) environmental ideology: the government must be responsible for environmental damage; and (5) environmental ideology: transparent enforcement of legal policies.

References

Adetomokun, I. J. (2012). A systemic functional linguistics (SFL) analysis of Yoruba students’ narratives of identity at three Western Cape universities. Thesis. https://uwcscholar.uwc.ac.za:8443/server/api/core/bitstreams/3c853147-77b3-446f-

b8-8f4b0aff74b2/content

Ali, J. H. M. (2019). Ecolinguistics and systemic functional linguistics (SFL): Transitivity in’Climate Change in Egypt’by Ali Masria. Beni-Suef Univ. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci, 1(1), 9–38. https://www.doi.org/10.21608/buijhs.2019.91308

Alzahrani, S. (2022). Semantic negation on verbal clauses with verbs of imminence in Saudi i Arabic varieties. NOTION J. Linguist. Lit. Cult, 4(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v4i2.6672

Armingeon, K., & Bürgisser, R. (2021). Trade-offs between redistribution and environmental protection: the role of information, ideology, and self-interest. J. Eur. Public Policy, 28(4), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.174971

Ayomi, P. N. (2018). Proses relasional dan konstruksinya dalam klausa bahasa Indonesia. In Seminar Nasional Tentang Penerjemahan, Linguistik Terapan, Susastra, dan Ilmu Budaya (pp. 114–123).

Bartley, L. V. (2018). Putting transitivity to the test: a review of the Sydney and Cardiff models. Funct. Linguist, 5(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0056-x

Chen, W. (2018). A critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump’s inaugural speech from the perspective of systemic functional grammar. Theory Pract. Lang. Stud, 8(8), 966–972. https://www.academypublication.com/issues2/tpls/vol08/08/07.pdf

Daar, G. F., & Gunas, T. (2025). Ideology and meaning in ritual lexicons: A dialectical ecolinguistic analysis of the Teing Hang Woja text in the Manggarai speech community. NOTION J. Linguist. Lit. Cult, 7(2), 262–283,. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v7i2.14073

Davidovic, D., Harring, N., & Jagers, S. C. (2020). The contingent effects of environmental concern and ideology: institutional context and people’s willingness to pay environmental taxes. Env. Polit, 29(4), 674–696,. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1606882

Dinçel, D., & Yıldız, A. (2025). The role of environmental ideologies in environmental education. J. Environ. Educ, 56(5), 368–389,. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2025.2498885

Fairclough, N. (1985). Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 739–763.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. Pearson Education.

Fairclough, N. L. (2003). Analyzing Discourse: textual analysis for social research. Amazon.

Gong, H., & Liu, L. (2018). Ecological discourse analysis of an UN environmental story in terms of transitivity process. Adv. Lang. Lit. Stud, 9(3), 67. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.3p.67

Haig, E. (2001). A study of the application of critical discourse analysis to ecolinguistics and the teaching of eco-literacy. Stud. Lang. Cult. (Nagoya Univ. Fac). Lang. Cult, 22(2), 205–226,. https://www.lang.nagoya-u.ac.jp/proj/genbunronshu/22-2/haig.pdf

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, text and context. New York.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd Ed.).

Hodder Education.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th

Ed.). Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional (Vol. 17, Issue

. Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1st Ed.). Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). Some grammatical problems in scientific English. Applying English

Grammar, 77–94.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2001). New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In ecology, A. F. Environment, & P. Mühlhäusler (Eds.), The ecolinguistics reader: Language (pp. 175–202). Continuum.

Javed, E., Fatima, I., & Imran, A. (2025). Ecolinguistics and advertising: Dissecting ideology in media discourse. J. Appl. Linguist. TESOL, 8(2), 2450–2463,. https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt868

Lei, L. (2022). Exploring ecological identity from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics. J. World Lang, 7(3), 487–514. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0013

Li, M., & Liu, Z. (2024). Ecological discourse analysis and meaning interpretation of BBC news reports on 2019 Australian bushfires from the perspective of transitivity system. Lodz Pap. Pragmat, 20(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2024-2007

Mahsun. (2017). Metode penelitian bahasa: Tahapan, strategi, metode, dan tekniknya. Rajawali Pers.

Munalim, L. O. (2017). Mental processes in teachers’ reflection papers: A transitivity analysis in Systemic Functional Linguistics. 3L. Lang. Linguist. Lit, 23(2). http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2302-12

Nor, N. F. M., Taufek, T. E., & Aziz, J. (2026). From sentiment to ideology: An ecolinguistic analysis of environmental discourse. In A Critical Analysis of Climate Change Opinion News in Malaysian Media (p. 77–120). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10333-8_4

Penz, A., H., & Fill. (2022). Ecolinguistics. In I. J. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. John Benjamins.

Ponton, D. M. (2024). Language and ecology in social imaginaries: Ecolinguistic perspectives. J. World Lang, 10(2), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2024-0052

Purwaningrum, P. W., & Harmoko, D. D. (2023). Critical discourse analysis of proportional closed election system news (on the online media CNNindonesia.com and News.detik.com. NOTION J. Linguist. Lit. Cult, 5(2), 190–207,.

https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v5i2.7960

Santoso, A. (2008). Jejak Halliday dalam linguistik kritis dan analisis wacana kritis. Jurnal Bahasa

Dan Seni, 36(1), 1–14. https://sastra.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/JejakHalliday-dalam-Linguistik-Kritis-dan-Analisis-Wacana-Kritis-Anang-Santoso.pdf

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2009). Grammar, the sentence, and traditions of linguistic analysis. In Handbook of research on writing (pp. 673–692). Routledge.

Sinar, T. (2012). Teori dan analisis wacana: Pendekatan linguistik sistemik fungsional. CV. MITRA Medan.

Steffensen, A., V., S., & Fill. (2014). Ecolinguistics: The state of the art and future horizons. Lang. Sci, 41, 6–25,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003

Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge.

Suardi, J. B. (2025). Bencana Sumatera, sebuah pandangan ekoteologis dan krisis kebijakan lingkungan. Baznas Lampung. https://lampung.baznas.go.id/artikel/show/bencanasumatera-sebuah-pandangan-ekoteologis-dan-krisis-kebijakan-lingkungan/33178

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Duta Wacana University Press.

Suparno, D., Darojat, Z., Nurhuda, Z. Z., & Kurniawati, W. (2026). Ecolinguistics and transitivity analysis in sustainable development: The case of the Nusantara capital city. In Towards Resilient Societies: The Synergy of Religion (p. 287–292). Education, Health, Science, and Technology, CRC Press.

Yasmin, M., & Amin, S. (2024). Framing vulnerability: An ecolinguistic analysis of gender and climate change discourse. Curr. Res. Environ. Sustain, 7, 100258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2024.100258

Zhang, R., & He, W. (2020). Human-nature relationships in experiential meaning: Transitivity system of Chinese from an ecolinguistic perspective. J. World Lang, 6(3), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2020.1819519

Downloads

Published

2026-05-28