The role of artificial intelligence in contemporary literary practice: Perceptions and implications

Authors

  • Firah Alifiah Ningrum Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Yeti Mulyati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Sumiyadi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Halimah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Zhuoxun Ye Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v8i1.15292

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Creative Writing, Literature, Perception, Implication

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between literature and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the development of digital technology. While AI is increasingly shaping how writers work from generating ideas to editing, there is still a lack of empirical focus on how this affects authorial agency, especially in the Indonesian context. This study used a qualitative descriptive method, distributing an online questionnaire to 53 literary writers in Indonesia, including poetry, short story, novel, and drama writers. The results showed that 62% of respondents use AI as a tool to facilitate the writing process, while 22% view it as a potential threat to creativity. Most respondents (82%) believe that AI cannot replace writers because it lacks emotional experience and cultural understanding. Furthermore, 50% of respondents believe AI can improve the technical aspects of writing, although 22% stated that excessive use can diminish the originality of the work. These findings imply that the integration of AI requires writers to develop critical digital literacy, ensuring that technology serves as a collaborative partner rather than a replacement for human creative identity. Overall, this study concludes that AI plays a supporting role in the creative process but still requires the writer’s supervision and control to maintain the quality and originality of literary works. Beyond individual practice, these results highlight the need for literary institutions to establish ethical guidelines that protect authorial voice in an increasingly automated environment.

References

Amal, B., Noviana, C., Utarie, G. P., Azizah, I. R. U., Fransiska, M., Aprilia, R., & Tarihoran, P. (2024). Peran artificial intelligence sebagai referensi membuat karya sastra cerita pendek. Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni, 13(1), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.59672/stilistika.v13i1.4222

Amyatun, R. L., & Kholis, A. (2023). Can artificial intelligence (AI) like QuillBot AI assist students’ writing skills? Assisting learning to write texts using AI. ELE Reviews: English Language Education Reviews, 3(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.22515/elereviews.v3i2.7533

Amirjalili, F., Neysani, M., & Nikbakht, A. (2024). Exploring the boundaries of authorship: A comparative analysis of AI-generated text and human academic writing in English literature. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1347421

Aziz, A. (2021). Moral values and struggle in the story of Saba Nan Aluih, from the region of Padang Tarok, Baso, Agam. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 3(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v3i2.4832

Bajohr, H. (2022). Artistic artificial intelligence and literary writing. CounterText, 8(2), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.3366/count.2022.0270

Begum, S. (2025). AI and literature: The impact of artificial intelligence on creative writing and narrative forms. Journal of Social Signs Review, 3(06), 180–199. https://socialsignsreivew.com/index.php/12/article/view/293

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’21) (pp. 610–623). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Bewersdorff, A., Zhai, X., Roberts, J., & Nerdel, C. (2023). Myths, mis- and preconceptions of artificial intelligence: A review of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100143

Burroway, J., Stuckey-French, E., & Stuckey-French, N. (2019). Writing fiction: A guide to narrative craft (10th ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Citrawati, T., Supriyanto, T., Suminar, T., & Haryadi, H. (2025). Futurologi pendidikan bahasa di era digital: Eksplorasi AI untuk literasi anak usia SD. GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 463–474. https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.vi.21690

Coeckelbergh, M. (2021). AI ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623

Fitria, T. N. (2022). Figurative language in the broken wingsby Kahlil Gibran: An analysis of language style as stylistic effect. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 4(2), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v4i2.5798

Floridi, L. (2025). Distant writing: Literary production in the age of artificial intelligence. Minds & Machines, 35, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-025-09732-1

Floridi, L. (2018). Soft ethics and the governance of the digital. Philosophy & Technology, 31(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0303-9

Guo, A., Sathyanarayanan, S., Wang, L., Heer, J., & Zhang, A. X. (2025). From pen to prompt: How creative writers integrate AI into their writing practice. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C ’25) (pp. 527–545). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3698061.3726910

Hayles, N. K. (2012). How we think: Digital media and contemporary technogenesis. University of Chicago Press.

Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought: The power of the cognitive nonconscious. University of Chicago Press.

Hayles, N. K. (2021). Postprint: Books and becoming computational. Columbia University Press.

Jannah, R., Zamzani, Z., & Albaburrahim, A. (2025). Transformasi stilistika alternative universe dan kontribusinya terhadap literasi bahasa masa depan. GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 1290–1306. https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.vi.21675

Kartika, A., & Suprapto, E. (2018). Kajian kesusastraan: Sebuah pengantar. CV AE Media Grafika.

Kustinah, Haryanti, S., Yuwono, S. E., & Sholihah, U. (2021). Afro-American literature: The analysis of gorilla, my love by Toni Cade Bambara. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 3(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v3i1.3547

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Maulidina, P., & Wibowo, H. (2022). The use of Grammarly tools to enrich students’ writing ability. Lingua, 18(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.34005/lingua.v18i2.2246

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

Nurdiani, S. F., Sukarna, D. K., Aulia, R., Dwinatasya, S., Khasanah, S., Herlangga, R. Y., & Amal, B. (2025). Literasi digital dalam proses pembelajaran artificial intelligence bagi mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 5(3), 2143–2151. https://doi.org/10.53769/deiktis.v5i3.1136

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2005). Sastra anak: Pengantar pemahaman dunia anak. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Pham, N. N. H. (2025). The use of ChatGPT in EFL students as a learning assistant in their writing skills: A literature review. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25213

Pradopo, R. D. (2013). Beberapa teori sastra, metode, kritik, dan penerapannya. Pustaka Pelajar.

Reza, M., Thomas-Mitchell, J., Dushniku, P., Laundry, N., Williams, J. J., & Kuzminykh, A. (2025). Co-writing with AI, on human terms: Aligning research with user demands across the writing process. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(7), Article CSCW385, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3757566

Rokib, M. (2025). Sejarah awal sastra internet di Indonesia: Dari milis ke majalah daring. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 8(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v8i3.1448

Safitri, P. E. (2020). Improving poetry writing ability using acrostic technique in class X students of vocational school Taman Karya Madya Pertambangan Kebumen. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 2(2), 110–113. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v2i2.6973

Setiawan, D. (2021). Kearifan lokal dalam cerita rakyat. UIN Malang Press.

Setiawan, R. & Nurhidayah, S. (2022). Traversing magical realism in postcolonial literature. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 4(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v4i1.5692.

Siswanto, W. (2008). Pengantar teori sastra. Grasindo.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Uswatun Hasanah, H., Munir, A., & Mustofa, A. (2025). Ethical AI implementation in educational settings: Balancing innovation with academic integrity and student privacy. GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 281–300. https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.vi.21764

Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williams, K. (2022). Quality vs. quantity in digital literature. Beacon Press.

Wiyatmi. (2009). Pengantar kajian sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zhang, H. (2025). Literary writing and ethical issues in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 25(5), 4539–4550. https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978251337920

Zinsser, W. (2006). On writing well: The classic guide to writing nonfiction (30th anniversary ed.). Harper Perennial.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-28