Ideology and meaning in ritual lexicons: A dialectical eco-linguistic analysis of the Teing Hang Woja text in the Manggarai speech community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v7i2.14073Keywords:
Lexicons, Teing Hang Woja, Language meaning, Ideology, Manggarai speech communityAbstract
Ritual language in Manggarai holds profound cultural-ecological significance, as it encodes collective values, environmental wisdom, and human–nature interdependence. Yet, despite eco-linguistic concerns over how language shapes and reflects ecological relationships, the lexicons of Teing Hang Woja have not previously been examined through this perspective. This study aims to describe the ideology and meaning of lexicons used in the ritual text of the teing hang woja in the speech Community of Manggarai, Flores Indonesia. This study also aims to describe the shift in the lexicons in the text as a result of changes in people's social activities. This is qualitative research with a phenomenological approach. Data were collected through interviews, participative observation, and Focus Group Discussion. Ten key informants were selected for interviews and FGD needs with several criteria. The results showed that the lexicons in the ritual text of teing hang woja contained the ideology of asking for an abundance of water, smoothness, and success of the agricultural process which were closely related to the socio-cultural conditions of the people as farmers. However, along with the social development of the community, the ideology contained in the text then expanded to other aspects such as the pleading for the success of the livestock business, education, and public health of the speakers. Meanwhile, the meaning contained in the text is more about stylistic meaning, affective meaning, social and reflective or spiritual meaning. The lexical analysis in Teing Hang Woja text not only provides insights into Manggarai's cultural ecology but also enriches eco-linguistic studies, emphasizing the importance of understanding language in efforts to safeguard ecological sustainability.
References
Adoui, A. (2024). Language and identity in multilingual societies : Exploring the role of language policies in the contexts of Morocco and the United States. Lingua. Language and Culture, 2(April), 58–78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380095714_Language_and_Identity_in_Multilingual_Societies_Exploring_the_Role_of_Language_Policies_in_the_Contexts_of_Morocco_and_the_United_States.
Ali, O., Saif, M., & Kunjamma, S. (2018). Language and ideology : Linguistic and Philosophical perspectives. Language in India, 18(49042), 137–150. https://www.languageinindia.com/oct2018/ohoodlanguageideologyfinal.pdf
Allan, K. (2014). Linguistic meaning. In Linguistic Meaning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880297
Alzahrani, S. (2022). Semantic negation on verbal clauses with verbs of imminence in Saudi i Arabic varieties. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 4(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v4i2.6672
Aminudin, M. F., Alade, S., Widyastuti, S. H., & Wiyatmi, W. (2024). Traditional symbols and social constructs in M. Irata’s Momuhuto: A literary sociology perspective. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 6(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v6i2.11149
Amoruso, L., Gelormini, C., Aboitiz, F., Alvarez González, M., Manes, F., Cardona, J., & Ibanez, A. (2013). N400 ERPs for actions: Building meaning in context. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(FEB), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00057
Anderson, T., Knobloch-Fedders, L. M., Stiles, W. B., Ordoñez, T., & Heckman, B. D. (2012). The power of subtle interpersonal hostility in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A speech acts analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 22(3), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.658097
Asatiani, A., Hämäläinen, J., Penttinen, E., & Rossi, M. (2021). Constructing continuity across the organisational culture boundary in a highly virtual work environment. Information Systems Journal, 31(1), 62–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12293
Bachorowski, J., & Owren, M. J. (2009). Emotion in speech. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, 897–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045046-9.01897-0
Bakó, R. K., Hubbes, L. A., & Tamás, D. (2021). Eco-discourses in a virtual rural community. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063082
Bang, Jørgen & Døør, J. (1993). Eco-Linguistics: A Framework. 1–18. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jcbang.dk%2Fmain%2Fecolinguistics%2FEcoling_AFramework1993.pdf&psig=AOvVaw1I8_ASnoLK-BSOFBBI4tdf&ust=1730339769281000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&ved=0CAQQn5wMahcKEwjwpqSMgLWJAxUAAAAAHQAAAAAQBA
Bang, J. C., & Trampe, W. (2014). Aspects of an ecological theory of language. Language Sciences, 41, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.009
Braçaj, M. (2014). Reflection on Language, culture and translation and culture as a challenge for translation process. Journal of Educational and Social Research, August. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n4p332
Bundsgaard, J., & Steffensen, S. (2000). The dialectics of ecological morphology-or the morphology of dialectics. Dialectal Ecolinguistics: Three Essays for the Symposium 30 Years of Language and Ecology in Graz, January 2002, 8–34.
Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2015). Translanguaging and identity in educational settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000233
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design; Choosing among five approaches. In SAGE (Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00177
Crisp, R. J., & Meleady, R. (2012). Adapting to a multicultural future. Science, 336, 853–855. https://doi.org/10.3167/armw.2022.100119
Daud, A., Dahlan, S., Ternate, I., & Ternate, U. (2021). Language as a reflection of thinking. EDUKASI - Jurnal Pendidikan, 19(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33387/j.edu.v19i1.
Derni, A. (2008). The ecolinguistic paradigm: An integrationist trend in language study. International Journal, 24, 21–30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255576624_The_Ecolinguistic_Paradigm_An_Integrationist_Trend_in_Language_Study.
Döring, M., & Ratter, B. (2018). The regional framing of climate change: Towards a place-based perspective on regional climate change perception in north Frisia. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 22(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-016-0478-0
Duan, Y. (2011). A pragmatic research report on compliment speech act. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(4), 356–360. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.4.356-360
Erk, K. (2012). Vector space models of word meaning and phrase meaning: A survey. Linguistics and Language Compass, 6(10), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnco.362
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2019). Cognitive linguistic. In EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY PRESS. EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315864327-10
Farsiu, S. (2021). An ecolinguistic perspective on Assyrian-Iranian migrants’ portrayal of emotions toward their linguistic resources. Language Sciences, 83, 101331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101331
Fernández-Vázquez, J. S. (2021). Analysing the environmental websites of the world’s greatest polluters: a multimodal ecolinguistic approach. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 34(1), 2692–2711. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1836993
Fill, A., & Mühlhäusler, P. (2006). the ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment. In CONTINUUM London and New York. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200308668051
Geoffrey Leech. (1981). Semantics; the study of meaning. Pinguin Books.
Gerstenberg, A. (2020). Pragmatic development in the (middle and) later stages of life. Developmental and Clinical Pragmatics, 1987, 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431056-008
Irene heim, A. K. (2019). Semantics in generative grammar. In Lingvisticae Investigationes (Vol. 42, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00033.cip
Iswandono, E., Zuhud, E. A. M., Hikmat, A., & Kosmaryandi, N. (2015). Integrating local culture into forest conservation: A case study of the manggarai tribe in Ruteng Mountains, Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 21(2), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.21.2.55
Janet, M. (2003). Language ideology and women ’ s speech: Talking Community in the northwest Amazon. American Anthropologist, 105(4), 794–806. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.1.2.2015.352-364
Juslin, P. N. (2013). From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: Towards a unified theory of musical emotions. Physics of Life Reviews, 10(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.05.008
Kanwal, A. (2024). An Ecolinguistic study of language teachers as activists in promoting dialogue on SDGs. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(5), 1593–1602. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1505.20
Kemmerer, D., & Gonzalez-Castillo, J. (2010). The two-level theory of verb meaning: An approach to integrating the semantics of action with the mirror neuron system. Brain and Language, 112(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.010
Knüsel, C. J., & Schotsmans, E. M. J. (2022). The routledge handbook of language and identity. In The Routledge Handbook of Archaeothanatology (Issue January 2016). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351030625
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principle of Pragmatics. Longman.
Li, J., Steffensen, S. V., & Huang, G. (2020). Rethinking ecolinguistics from a distributed language perspective. Language Sciences, 80, 101277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101277
Mbete, A. M. (2015). Pembelajaran bahasa berbasis lingkungan : Perspek- Tif Ekolinguistik. 1(2), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.1.2.2015.352-364.
Miles, M., Huberman, M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Data analysis qualitative a methods sourcebook. Edition 3. In SAGE (Third). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.30.25.33.s40
Munishi, S. (2018). Language and ideology in the context of language policy of Albanian language. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 8(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesr-2018-0023
Nahak, M. M. N., Simpen, I. W., Yadnya, I. B. P., & Satyawati, N. M. S. (2019). Lexicon in Batar text: Ecolinguistics view. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 5(6), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v5n6.763
Nash, J. (2016). Ecologically embedded languages, cumulative grammars and island ecologies1. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 48(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2016.1243977
Nuzwaty. (2019). oleh Nuzwaty Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara.
Poole, R. (2018). Ecolinguistics, GIS, and corpus linguistics for the analysis of the rosemont copper mine debate. Environmental Communication, 12(4), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1275735
Prastio, B., Santoso, A., Roekhan, Maulidina, A., Numertayasa, I. W., & Suardana, I. P. O. (2023). An ecolinguistic study: The representation of forest conservation practices in the discourse of Anak Dalam Jambi tribe, Indonesia. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2262788
Purwaningrum, P. W., & Harmoko, D. D. (2023). Critical discourse analysis of proportional closed election system news (on the online media CNNindonesia.com and News.detik.com). NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 5(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v5i2.7960
Purwaningrum, P. W., & Harmoko, D. D. (2025). Ideological critique and dynamics of democracy: critical discourse analysis of the “Pasar Bebas Capres” narrative in revealing oligarchy on the Mata Najwa. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 7(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v7i1.11738
Rambut, K. (2021). Manggaraian expressions of environmental preservation: A study on ecolinguistics. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n2.1375
Sanjaya, F. O., & Rahardi, R. K. (2021). Kajian Ekolinguistik Metaforis nilai-nilai kearifan lokal upacara pernikahan adat Manggarai, Flores, Nusa Tenggara Timur. Deiksis: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.33603/deiksis.v7i2.3283
Series, C. (2019). Language and ecology in ecolinguistics perspective : A case study on tunjuk ajar language in Riau , Indonesia language and ecology in ecolinguistics perspective : A Case Study on Tunjuk Ajar Language in Riau , Indonesia.
Steffensen, S. V., & Fill, A. (2014). Ecolinguistics: The state of the art and future horizons. Language Sciences, 41, 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003
Stibbe, A. (2010). Ecolinguistics and globalization. The Handbook of Language and Globalization, 1972, 406–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444324068.ch18
Stibbe, A. (2014). an Ecolinguistic approach to critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.845789
Umiyati, M. (2020). The existence of natural lexicons in ‘awig-awig’ tenganan pegringsingan Bali: An Ecolinguistic Approach. Jurnal Kajian Bali, 10(1), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.24843/JKB.2020.v10.i01.p09
Vallejo, C. (2018). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education, by Ofelia García and Li Wei. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 11(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.764
Warmadewa, U., Winaya, M. D., & Warmadewa, U. (2019). Leksikon-leksikon flora dalam metafora Bahasa Bali: Kajian ekolinguistik. Kulturistik, 3(2), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.22225/kulturistik.3.2.1192
Woolard, K. A. (1992). Language ideology: Issues and approaches. Pragmatics, 2(3), 235–249. https://benjamins.com/catalog/prag.2.3.01woo/fulltext%5Cnpapers3://publication/doi/10.1075/prag.2.3.01woo
Yang, Y., & Wang, M. (2021). An ecolinguistic approach to epidemic rumor discourse. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Modern Education and Humanities Science (ICMEHS 2021), 522(Icmehs), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210208.027
Yuniawan, T., Urip, S. R., Lestari, P. M., & Rohmadi, M. (2024). Floral lexicons in Javanese proverbs: An ecolinguistic study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(5), 1700–1710. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1505.31
Yunira, S., Fradina, S., Sumbayak, M., Putri, N. S., & Derin, T. (2020). Re-visits the grand theory of geoffrey leech: Seven types of meaning. REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 1(3), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v1i3.3768
Zhdanava, A., Kaur, S., & Rajandran, K. (2021). Representing nonhuman animals as equals: An ecolinguistic analysis of vegan campaigns. Journal of World Languages, 7(1), 26–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0003
Ziyatbay, A. (2024). Culture as a factor of continuity in the development of society. Pubmedia Social Sciences and Humanities, 2, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47134/pssh.v2i2.286.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gabriel Fredi Daar, Tobias Guna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their articles in NOTION: journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


