Exploring teachers' strategies in planning in-depth learning of science in junior high school

Authors

  • Kawit Sayoto Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Enung Hasanah Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Muhammad Zuhaery Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Russasmita Sri Padmi Johannes Keppler University Linz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/ijei.v7i1.14148

Keywords:

deep learning, instructional orchestrator, living systems and cells, metacognition

Abstract

This study aims to construct an effective deep science learning planning model for junior high school teachers on the topic of living systems and cells, focusing on teacher perceptions, student readiness, and the instructional challenges encountered. A descriptive qualitative method was employed, involving in-depth interviews with science teachers and a document study of instructional plans.  The findings reveal that deep science learning planning model is contingent upon a fundamental transformation of the teacher’s role into an instructional orchestrator who integrates spiritual dimensions as substantive learning outcomes. While students exhibited metacognitive gaps in navigating experimental inquiry, the study highlights the efficacy of faded scaffolding strategies and virtual laboratory integration in enhancing student self-efficacy amidst resource constraints. The research concludes that despite the systemic tension between time-intensive inquiry and standardized assessments, the adaptation of flexible scaffolding is crucial for bridging scientific reasoning with national testing policies. These results corroborate existing frameworks on deep learning while providing a practical model for teachers in constructing self-identity through an awareness of the Creator’s design in science.

References

Alam, A. (2022). Investigating sustainable education and positive psychology interventions in schools towards achievement of sustainable happiness and wellbeing for 21st century pedagogy and curriculum. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 19481. https://doi.org/ 10.1149/10701.19481ecst

Amini, G. U., Anami, S. F., & Utami, V. N. (2024). Interaksi sains dan agama: Perspektif kimia dalam agama Islam sebagai ilmu pengetahuan dan keimanan. Islamologi: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan, 1(2), 437-448. http://jipkm.com/index.php/islamologi/article/view/183

Artati, K. B., Wahyuni, E., & Fitri, S. (2025). Gambaran Kesejahteraan Psikologis Siswa Kelas Besar Sekolah Dasar dan Implikasinya Terhadap Program Mindfulness Berbasis Sekolah. G-Couns: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 9(2), 953-970. https://doi.org/10.31316/g-couns.v9i2.7044

Bergmann, M., Schäpke, N., Marg, O., Stelzer, F., Lang, D. J., Bossert, M., Gantert, M., Häußler, E., Marquardt, E., & Piontek, F. M. (2021). Transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: success factors and methods for change. Sustainability Science, 16, 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00886-8

Bråten, O. M. H., & Skeie, G. (2020). Deep learning in studies of religion and worldviews in Norwegian schools? The implications of the national curriculum renewal in 2020. Religions, 11(11), 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11110579

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Technical Report. Pearson. https://staging.oer4pacific.org/id/eprint/5/

Hasanah, E., Suyatno, S., Maryani, I., Badar, M. I. Al, Fitria, Y., & Patmasari, L. (2022). Conceptual Model of differentiated-instruction (DI) Based on teachers’ experiences in Indonesia. Education Sciences, 12(10), 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100650

Hasanah, E., Maryani, I., & Gestiardi, R. (2023). Digital-based Differentiation Learning Model in Schools. K-Media.

Hasanah, E. (2024). Managing Personalization and Collaboration in Education: A Systematic Review of Educational Practices. Al-Tanzim: Journal of Islamic Education Management, 8(3), 1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v8i3.8751

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hossain, S., O’neill, S., & Strnadová, I. (2023). What constitutes student well-being: A scoping review of students’ perspectives. Child Indicators Research, 16(2), 447–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-022-09990-w

Juanta, P., Nababan, M. N., Sijabat, A., Yohandri, Y., & Festiyed, F. (2023). Penerapan model pembelajaran inquiry training untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains (KPS) IPA Fisika siswa kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Muara Pendidikan, 8(1), 204-208. https://doi.org/10.52060/mp.v8i1.1041

Kusuma, Y. Y., & Sumianto, S. (2022). Pengembangan model manajemen pelatihan pembuatan bahan ajar berbasis kearifan lokal bagi guru. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 2(2), 35-39. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/72

Malik, R. S. (2018). Educational challenges in 21st century and sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 2(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsder.v2i1.12266

Mashuri, M., & Hasanah, E. (2021). Manajemen pembelajaran bahasa Inggris dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa saat pandemi COVID-19 di SMA Muhammadiyah 3 Yogyakarta. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 4(2), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v4i2.174

Mehta, J., & Fine, S. (2019). In search of deeper learning: The quest to remake the American high school. Harvard University Press.

Norrizqa, H. (2021). Berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran IPA. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA. https://jbse.ulm.ac.id/index.php/PMPIPA/article/view/37

Nugraha, I. P. R., & Nurita, T. (2021). Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains (KPS) siswa SMP. Pensa E-Jurnal: Pendidikan Sains, 9(1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.26740/pensa.v9i1.38503

Sabrina, M., Hairani, M., & Syahrial, S. (2024). Pengembangan model pembelajaran kolaboratif antara guru dan orang tua dalam mendukung kemajuan belajar siswa di sekolah dasar. Dinamika Pembelajaran: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Bahasa, 1(2), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.62383/dilan.v1i2.117

Saldaña, J. (2021). Coding techniques for quantitative and mixed data. The Routledge reviewer’s guide to mixed methods analysis, 151-160.

Siregar, T. (2023). Stages of research and development model research and development (R&D). DIROSAT: Journal of Education, Social Sciences & Humanities, 1(4), 142-158. https://doi.org/10.58355/dirosat.v1i4.48

Sukristin, S., Sabaryati, J., Akbar, A., & Sulestry, A. I. (2025). Developing pedagogical innovation: AI-based deep learning training in elementary education. Jurnal Pedagogi dan Inovasi Pendidikan, 1(3), 1-7. https://jurnal-pip.com/index.php/jpip/article/view/16

Thiers, N. (2017). Making progress possible: A conversation with Michael Fullan. Educational Leadership, 74(9), 8-14. https://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Michael-Fullan-Educational-Leadership-Six-Secrets-Interview.pdf

Tifani, A., & Dewi, N. R. (2023). Penerapan model problem based learning untuk meningkatkan keterampian sosial peserta didik kelas VIII E SMP N 41 Semarang. In Proceeding Seminar Nasional IPA (pp. 456-465). Universitas Negeri Semarang. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/snipa/article/view/2327/1795

Yusmar, F., & Fadilah, R. E. (2023). Analisis rendahnya literasi sains peserta didik Indonesia: Hasil PISA dan faktor penyebab. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 13(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v13i1.283

Downloads

Published

2026-02-03

How to Cite

Sayoto, K., Hasanah, E., Zuhaery, M., & Padmi, R. S. (2026). Exploring teachers’ strategies in planning in-depth learning of science in junior high school. International Journal on Education Insight, 7(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijei.v7i1.14148

Issue

Section

Articles