Teachers’ professional competence profile dataset during implementation of Merdeka curriculum

Authors

  • Ika Maryani Department of Elementary Teacher Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7154-2902
  • Nursyiva Irsalinda Department of Mathematics, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta
  • Patria Handung Jaya Department of Elementary Teacher Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta
  • Hanum Hanifa Sukma Department of Elementary Teacher Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta
  • Arumugam L. Raman School of Education, College of Arts and Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/fundadikdas.v7i1.9946

Keywords:

Merdeka curriculum, Professional competence, Teacher training, Curriculum implementation, Educational quality

Abstract

The Merdeka curriculum serves as a mechanism for enhancing the quality of education in Indonesia. Effective utilization of professional competence among educators can expedite the success of the Merdeka curriculum. However, the challenges associated with the Merdeka curriculum, as encountered by educators, are multifaceted and demand a high level of professionalism for resolution. This study aims to scrutinize teachers' professional competence concerning the design of learning activities within the Merdeka curriculum. It constitutes a quantitative descriptive study involving 205 primary school teachers from Indonesia. A semantic differential scale, administered through a Google Form, was employed to gather data on professional competence, comprising three indicators and 12 questions. The validity of the instrument was assessed using Pearson correlation, and reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha. This investigation encompassed a series of cluster analysis procedures. The research has yielded significant insights into the professional competence of teachers during the implementation of the Merdeka curriculum in Indonesia. The categorization of teachers' professional competence reveals a prevalence of moderate to high competence, with a minority exhibiting low competence. These findings underscore the necessity for attention from governmental bodies and other stakeholders. Prioritizing training and sustainable professional development through collaborative learning communities emerges as imperative. Areas identified for enhancement encompass an understanding of student characteristics and pedagogical methodologies, mastery of learning content, and proficiency in curriculum development and implementation.

Author Biography

Ika Maryani, Department of Elementary Teacher Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta

Department of Elementary School Teacher Education

ID Scopus: 57201317212

ID Google Scholar: 8pX1itYAAAAJ

ID Sinta: 23052

 

References

D. Rahmadayanti and A. Hartoyo, “Potret Kurikulum Merdeka, Wujud Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 7174–7187, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3431.

B. Thornhill-Miller et al., “Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education,” J. Intell., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 54–60, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11030054.

L. Azhary, “Journal of English Language Teaching The Implementation of 21 st Century Skills ( Communication , Collaboration , Creativity and Critical Thinking ) in English Lesson Plan at MTsN 6 Agam,” vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 608–623, 2021, doi: 10.24036/jelt.v9i4.114944.

D. M. Gut, Integrating 21st Century Skills into the Curriculum BT - Bringing Schools into the 21st Century. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0268-4_7

S. Mustoip, “Analisis Penilaian Perkembangan Dan Pendidikan Karakter Di Kurikulum Merdeka Sekolah Dasar,” PANDU J. Pendidik. Anak dan Pendidik. Umum, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 144–151, 2023, doi: 10.59966/pandu.v1i3.470.

S. Devi, M. Asbari, U. Insan, and P. Indonesia, “Kurikulum Merdeka yang Memerdekakan Manusia : Perspektif Munif Chatib,” JISMA J. Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 03, no. 01, pp. 48–52, 2024.

E. Susilowati, “Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam,” Al-Miskawaih J. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 115–132, 2022, doi: 10.56436/mijose.v1i1.85.

S. Ihda, A. Masduki, and A. Hilyah, “Kurikulum Merdeka : Fleksibilitas Kurikulum bagi Guru dan Siswa,” J. Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 02, no. 05, pp. 86–92, 2023.

Ardiansyah, F. S. Mawaddah, and Juanda, “Assesmen dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar,” J. Literasi dan Pembelajaran Indones., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 2023.

S. Zulaiha and T. Meldina, “Problematika Guru dalam Merdeka Belajar Menerapkan Kurikulum,” Terampil J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Dasar, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 163–177, 2022.

I. Ramadhan, “Dinamika Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Di Sekolah Pada Aspek Perangkat Dan Proses Pembelajaran,” Acad. Educ. J., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 622–634, 2023, doi: 10.47200/aoej.v14i2.1835.

I. I. Irvy, “Understanding the Learning Models Design for Indonesian Teacher,” Int. J. Asian Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 95–106, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.46966/ijae.v1i2.40.

A. I. Numanovich and M. A. Abbosxonovich, “Overview of curriculum change: a brief discussion,” EPRA Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. (IJMR)-Peer Rev. J., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 198–210, 2020, doi: 10.36713/epra2013.

S. Suyanto, “A reflection on the implementation of a new curriculum in Indonesia: A crucial problem on school readiness,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2017, vol. 1868, no. 1, pp. 1–10, doi: 10.1063/1.4995218.

Y. Dong, C. Xu, C. S. Chai, and X. Zhai, “Exploring the Structural Relationship Among Teachers’ Technostress, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), Computer Self-efficacy and School Support,” Asia-Pacific Educ. Res., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 147–157, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5.

D. Sulisworo, R. Nasir, and I. Maryani, “Identification of teachers ’ problems in Indonesia on facing global community,” Int. J. Res. Stud. Educ., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 81–90, 2017, doi: 10.5861/ijrse.2016.1519.

I. Maryani and V. Damayanti, “Identifikasi permasalahan guru di Indonesia dalam menghadapi ASEAN economic community,” in Seminar Nasional “Optimalisasi Peran Pendidikan dalam Membangun Karakter Anak untuk Menyongsong Generasi Emas Indonesia,” 2016, pp. 226–232.

R. Fitriansyah, L. Fatinah, and M. Syahril, “Critical Review: Professional Development Programs to Face Open Educational Resources in Indonesia,” Indones. J. Learn. Adv. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 109–119, 2020, doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v2i2.9662.

H. Prasetyono, A. Abdillah, T. Djuhartono, I. P. Ramdayana, and L. Desnaranti, “Improvement of teacher’s professional competency in strengthening learning methods to maximize curriculum implementation,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 720–727, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21010.

C. Pramana, D. Chamidah, S. Suyatno, F. Renadi, and S. Syaharuddin, “Strategies to Improved Education Quality in Indonesia: A Review,” Artic. Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1977–1994, 2021.

S. Supadi, E. Soraya, H. Muhammad, and N. Halim, “Making sense the teacher evaluation with the value of local culture (The voice of school principals in Indonesia),” Int. J. Educ. Manag., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1124–1135, 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-08-2020-0408.

J. Kim, J. Ryu, B. Jeong, and R. de Dear, “Semantic discrepancies between Korean and English versions of the ASHRAE sensation scale,” Build. Environ., vol. 221, p. 109343, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109343.

J. Filgona, F. Jacob, S. John, and D. M. Gwany, “Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Students' Academic Achievement: a Theoretical Overview,” J. Glob. Res. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 14–44, 2020.

J. Gess-Newsome, J. A. Taylor, J. Carlson, A. L. Gardner, C. D. Wilson, and M. A. M. Stuhlsatz, “Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement† ,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 944–963, May 2019, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158.

M. J. Koehler, P. Mishra, K. Kereluik, T. S. Shin, and C. R. Graham, The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework BT - Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9

A. Unda-López, G. Osejo-Taco, A. Vinueza-Cabezas, C. Paz, and P. Hidalgo-Andrade, “Procrastination during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review,” Behav. Sci. (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 150–155, 2022, doi: 10.3390/bs12020038.

J. L. Mahoney et al., “Systemic social and emotional learning: Promoting educational success for all preschool to high school students.,” American Psychologist, vol. 76, no. 7. American Psychological Association, Mahoney, Joseph L.: Department of Human Behavior, Justice, and Diversity, University of Wisconsin-Superior, 3106 Swenson Hall, Belknap and Catlin Avenue, Superior, WI, US, 54880, jmahone4@uwsuper.edu, pp. 1128–1142, 2021, doi: 10.1037/amp0000701.

O. A. Ulfah, “Peran Guru Dalam Upaya Pengembangan Bakat Dan Minat Peserta Didik,” J. Al-Amar, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2022.

S. A. Parsons et al., “Teachers’ Instructional Adaptations: A Research Synthesis,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 205–242, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.3102/0034654317743198.

U. Kubat, “Identifying the individual differences among students during learning and teaching process by science teachers,” Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 30–38, 2018, doi: 10.21890/ijres.369746.

R. Rosni, “Kompetensi guru dalam meningkatkan mutu pembelajaran di sekolah dasar,” J. Educ. J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 113, 2021, doi: 10.29210/1202121176.

Rofiatun Nisa’ and Eli Fatmawati, “Kerjasama Orang Tua dan Guru dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik,” Ibtida’, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 135–150, 2020, doi: 10.37850/ibtida.v1i2.147.

M. A. Flores, “Teacher Education Curriculum BT - International Handbook of Teacher Education: Volume 1,” J. Loughran and M. L. Hamilton, Eds. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016, pp. 187–230. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-0366-0_5

S. F. Shawer, “Teacher-driven curriculum development at the classroom level: Implications for curriculum, pedagogy and teacher training,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 63, pp. 296–313, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.017.

C. Angeli et al., “A K-6 Computational Thinking Curriculum Framework: Implications for Teacher Knowledge,” J. Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 47–57, Jan. 2016.

P. Nilsson and A. Vikström, “Making PCK Explicit—Capturing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) in the Science Classroom,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 37, no. 17, pp. 2836–2857, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1106614.

E. Instefjord and E. Munthe, “Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology: an analysis of the emphasis on digital competence in teacher education curricula,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 77–93, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2015.1100602.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-05

How to Cite

Maryani, I., Irsalinda , N. ., Jaya , P. H. ., Sukma, H. H. ., & Raman , A. L. . (2024). Teachers’ professional competence profile dataset during implementation of Merdeka curriculum. Jurnal Fundadikdas (Fundamental Pendidikan Dasar), 7(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.12928/fundadikdas.v7i1.9946

Issue

Section

Articles