An analysis of elementary students’ differential comprehension of fiction texts from barrett’s perspective

Authors

  • Ayyas Yahya Primary Education Department, Universitas Sebeles Maret, Surakarta
  • Karsono Karsono Primary Education Department, Universitas Sebeles Maret, Surakarta
  • Naeliyatun 'Azizah Primary Education Department, Universitas Sebeles Maret, Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/fundadikdas.v8i3.14632

Keywords:

Reading comprehension, Barrett’s taxonomy, Elementary students, Fiction text, Case study

Abstract

This study examines the levels of fiction text comprehension among fourth-grade primary school students in Surakarta, Indonesia, using Barrett’s Taxonomy as the analytical framework. A descriptive qualitative approach with a case study design was employed, and data were collected through reading comprehension tests, classroom observations, and interviews with students and teachers. The five levels of comprehension literal, reorganization, inferential, evaluative, and appreciative were assessed to map the range of students’ reading abilities. The findings show notable variation across comprehension levels. Literal comprehension achieved the highest score (91.35%, high category), indicating strong ability to recall explicit information. In contrast, reorganization (40.73%) and inferential comprehension (43.20%) were categorized as low, suggesting difficulties in synthesizing information and interpreting implicit meaning. Evaluative comprehension was moderate (69.13%), while appreciative comprehension received the lowest score (35.79%), reflecting limited engagement with the emotional and aesthetic qualities of the text. Overall, the results indicate that although students demonstrate strong surface-level understanding, their higher-order cognitive and affective comprehension skills are underdeveloped. The study recommends instructional practices that extend beyond factual recall by fostering critical interpretation, reflective judgment, and deeper engagement with literary texts. The implications for curriculum design and classroom instruction are outlined to address these specific gaps in comprehension.

References

X. Ma, “Enhancing language skills and student engagement: Investigating the impact of Quizlet in teaching Chinese as a foreign language,” Lang. Test. Asia, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 5, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40468-024-00275-3.

T. H. A. Al-Jiboury, “Teaching four Skills of English Language Writing, Reading, Speaking, and Listening through Literature,” South Asian Res J Art Lang Lit, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 63–72, 2024, doi: 10.36346/sarjall.2024.v06i05.001.

G. Romero Karlsson and M. Barahona, “Exploring literary competences in EFL preservice teachers’ pedagogical proposals,” Cogent Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2406140, 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2406140.

O. M. Sadriddinovna, “The Educational Impact of The Role of Fiction in Reading and Writing,” in International Conference on Linguistics, Literature And Translation (London), 2025, vol. 12, pp. 33–37.

H. Van Le, T. A. D. Nguyen, D. H. N. Le, P. U. Nguyen, and T. T. A. Nguyen, “Unveiling critical reading strategies and challenges: a mixed-methods study among English major students in a Vietnamese higher education institution,” Cogent Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2326732, 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2326732.

I. Gidiotis and S. Hrastinski, “Imagining the future of artificial intelligence in education: a review of social science fiction,” Learning, Media and Technology. Taylor & Francis, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.1080/17439884.2024.2365829.

E. J. Marsh, A. C. Butler, and S. Umanath, “Using fictional sources in the classroom: Applications from cognitive psychology,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 449–469, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10648-012-9204-0.

Q. Zhang, “Research on Mobile-Assisted English Language Learning Among Primary School Students in China: Focusing on Students’ Feedback of Learning English with Mobile Devices,” Learn. & Educ., 2021, doi: 10.18282/l-e.v10i3.2378.

A. Widiyatmoko, S. Utaminingsih, and Santoso, “Android-based math learning to improve critical thinking,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1823, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1823/1/012091.

B. Şimşek, “The effects of augmented reality storybooks on student’s reading comprehension,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 754–772, 2023, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13293.

M. J. P. Ersando, “Linking Barrett’s Taxonomy to Reading Comprehension and Problem-Solving: Implications for Math Performance in Primary Education,” Recoletos Multidiscip. Res. J., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 17–24, 2025, doi: 10.32871/rmrj2513.02.03.

R. L. Barrett, “East rarely meets West: A revised delimitation for Pultenaea (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae) with reinstatement of Euchilus and three new genera from south-west Western Australia,” Aust. Syst. Bot., vol. 37, no. 5, 2024, doi: 10.1071/SB23029.

S. Nurlaili, S. Hartatik, A. Akhwani, and M. Taufiq, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Malongka (Mari Lompat Angka) dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Open-Ended Materi Operasi Bilangan Kelas II SD,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 577–592, 2020, doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.269.

Published

2025-11-11

How to Cite

Yahya, A., Karsono, K., & ’Azizah, N. . (2025). An analysis of elementary students’ differential comprehension of fiction texts from barrett’s perspective . Jurnal Fundadikdas (Fundamental Pendidikan Dasar), 8(3). https://doi.org/10.12928/fundadikdas.v8i3.14632

Issue

Section

Articles