Maintaining Empathy and Relational Integrity in Digitally Mediated Social Work: Practitioner Strategies for Artificial Intelligence Integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/biste.v7i2.13008Keywords:
Digitally Mediated Social Work, Empathy Preservation, Artificial Intelligence Integration, Relational Integrity, AI-Enhanced Social ServicesAbstract
This study addresses the critical challenge of preserving relational integrity in social work practice within artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced environments. While AI technologies promise operational efficiency, their impact on empathy and human connection in social work is not fully understood. This research aims to explore how social workers maintain relational integrity when interacting with clients through AI tools, providing practical strategies and theoretical insights. The research contributes to the field by proposing a relational framework for AI integration in social work practice, emphasizing human-centered principles. The study utilizes a qualitative phenomenological approach, drawing on 24 licensed social workers from diverse sectors (e.g., child welfare, elder care, and mental health) in three urban areas known for AI adoption. Data collection involved semi-structured interviews and artifact analysis, including AI interface screenshots and decision-making protocols, to capture practitioner experiences. Findings reveal three key themes: reframing empathy in digital interactions, AI as a dual partner and adversary, and ethical tensions. Results indicate that video calls and visual aids are crucial for preserving empathy, while social workers employ proactive strategies to manage AI’s limitations. The study highlights the need for clear guidelines, interdisciplinary collaboration, and training to ensure AI supports relational practices rather than replacing them. These findings have significant policy and practice implications, offering a foundation for future research and AI tool development in social services.
References
J. van Dijke, I. van Nistelrooij, P. Bos, and J. Duyndam, “Towards a relational conceptualization of empathy,” Nursing Philosophy, vol. 21, no. 3, p. e12297, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12297.
R. Afrouz and J. Lucas, “A systematic review of technology-mediated social work practice: Benefits, uncertainties, and future directions,” Journal of Social Work, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 953–974, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173231165926.
G. Pei, H. Li, Y. Lu, Y. Wang, S. Hua, and T. Li, “Affective Computing: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Future Trends,” Intelligent Computing, vol. 3, Art. no. 0076, 2024, https://doi.org/10.34133/icomputing.0076.
B. Van Rhyn, A. Barwick, and M. Donelly, “Embodiment as an instrument for empathy in social work,” Australian Social Work, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 146-158, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2020.1839112.
L. Mitchinson, A. Dowrick, C. Buck, K. Hoernke, S. Martin, S. Vanderslott, H. Robinson, F. Rankl, L. Manby, S. Lewis-Jackson, and C. Vindrola-Padros, “Missing the human connection: A rapid appraisal of healthcare workers’ perceptions and experiences of providing palliative care during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Palliative Medicine, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 852-861, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163211004228.
K. Nordesjö, G. Scaramuzzino, and R. Ulmestig, “The social worker-client relationship in the digital era: a configurative literature review,” European Journal of Social Work, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 303–315, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1964445.
N. Ondrejková and J. Halamová, “Prevalence of compassion fatigue among helping professions and relationship to compassion for others, self‐compassion and self‐criticism,” Health and Social Care in the Community, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1680–1694, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13741.
C. Guidi and C. Traversa, “Empathy in patient care: from ‘Clinical Empathy’ to ‘Empathic Concern’,” Med. Health Care and Philos., vol. 24, pp. 573–585, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10033-4.
O. Keyes and J. Austin, “Feeling fixes: Mess and emotion in algorithmic audits,” Big Data & Society, vol. 9, no. 2, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221113772.m
F. Reamer, “Artificial intelligence in social work: Emerging ethical issues,” Int. J. Social Work Values Ethics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 52–71, 2023, https://doi.org/10.55521/10-020-205.
M. Steyvers and A. Kumar, “Three challenges for AI-assisted decision-making,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 722–734, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231181102.
M. Nuwasiima, M. P. Ahonon, and C. Kadiri, “The role of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in social work practice,” World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 80–97, 2024, https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.1.2998.
S. Pink, H. Ferguson, and L. Kelly, “Digital social work: Conceptualising a hybrid anticipatory practice,” Qualitative Social Work, vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 413–430, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250211003647.
E. Weber-Guskar, “How to feel about emotionalized artificial intelligence? When robot pets, holograms, and chatbots become affective partners,” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 23, pp. 601–610, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09598-8.
M. Seniutis, V. Gruzauskas, A. Lileikiene, and V. Navickas, “Conceptual framework for ethical artificial intelligence development in social services sector,” Human Technology, vol. 20, pp. 6–24, 2024, https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-1.1.
A. Noonia, R. Beg, A. Patidar, B. Bawaskar, S. Sharma, and H. Rawat, “Chatbot vs Intelligent Virtual Assistance (IVA),” in Conversational Artificial Intelligence, pp. 655–673, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394200801.ch36.
M. Mekni, “An Artificial Intelligence Based Virtual Assistant Using Conversational Agents,” Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, vol. 14, pp. 455-473, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2021.149027.
A. Aggarwal, C. C. Tam, D. Wu, X. Li, and S. Qiao, “Artificial intelligence–based chatbots for promoting health behavioral changes: systematic review,” Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), vol. 25, p. e40789, 2023, https://doi.org/10.2196/40789.
A. Casheekar, A. Lahiri, K. Rath, K. S. Prabhakar, and K. Srinivasan, “A contemporary review on chatbots, AI-powered virtual conversational agents, ChatGPT: Applications, open challenges and future research directions,” Computer Science Review, vol. 52, p. 100632, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.100632.
F. Osasona, O. Amoo, A. Atadoga, T. Abrahams, O. Farayola, and B. Ayinla, “Reviewing the ethical implications of AI in decision making processes,” International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 322–335, 2024, https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i2.773.
H. Hah and D. Goldin, “How clinicians perceive artificial intelligence–assisted technologies in diagnostic decision making: Mixed methods approach,” Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), vol. 23, no. 12, p. e33540, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2196/33540.
I. D. Raji, A. Smart, R. N. White, M. Mitchell, T. Gebru, B. Hutchinson, J. Smith-Loud, D. Theron, and P. Barnes, “Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing,” in Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT ’20), pp. 33–44, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372873.
D. Saxena, C. Repaci, M. D. Sage, and S. Guha, “How to Train a (Bad) Algorithmic Caseworker: A Quantitative Deconstruction of Risk Assessments in Child Welfare,” in Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’22), pp. 1–7, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519771.
A. Akingbola, O. Adeleke, A. Idris, O. Adewole, and A. Adegbesan, “Artificial Intelligence and the Dehumanization of Patient Care,” Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, vol. 3, no. 100138. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100138.
A. Sabater, B. López, R. Campdepadrós, and C. Sánchez, “Participatory Action Research for AI in Social Services: An Example of Local Practices from Catalonia,” In Participatory Artificial Intelligence in Public Social Services: From Bias to Fairness in Assessing Beneficiaries, pp. 79-96, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71678-2_4.
N. Mehrabi, F. Morstatter, N. Saxena, K. Lerman, and A. Galstyan, “A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1-35, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607.
L. Savolainen and M. Ruckenstein, “Dimensions of autonomy in human–algorithm relations,” New Media & Society, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 3472–3490, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221100802.
K. R. McKee, X. Bai, and S. T. Fiske, “Humans perceive warmth and competence in artificial intelligence,” iScience, vol. 26, no. 8, 2023, p. 107256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107256.
D. Grewal, A. Guha, C. B. Satornino, and E. B. Schweiger, “Artificial intelligence: The light and the darkness,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 136, pp. 229-236, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.043.
P. Formosa, W. Rogers, Y. Griep, S. Bankins, and D. Richards, “Medical AI and human dignity: Contrasting perceptions of human and artificially intelligent (AI) decision making in diagnostic and medical resource allocation contexts,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 133, p. 107296, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107296.
O. Brown, et al., “Theory-Driven Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Business and Management,” British Journal of Management, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 3-23, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12788.
M. Dorotic, E. Stagno, and L. Warlop, “AI on the street: Context-dependent responses to artificial intelligence,” Int. J. Res. Mark., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 113-137, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.08.010.
J. Emiliussen, S. Engelsen, R. Christiansen, and S. H. Klausen, “We are all in it!: Phenomenological Qualitative Research and Embeddedness,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 20, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921995304.
H. Williams, “The Meaning of ‘Phenomenology’: Qualitative and Philosophical Phenomenological Research Methods,” The Qual. Rep., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 366-385, 2021, https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4587.
M. Englander and J. Morley, “Phenomenological psychology and qualitative research,” Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci., vol. 22, pp. 25–53, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09781-8.
S. Monaro, J. Gullick, and S. West, “Qualitative data analysis for health research: A step-by-step example of phenomenological interpretation,” The Quality Report, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1040-1057, 2022, https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5249.
L. Jedličková, M. Müller, D. Halová, and T. Cserge, “Combining interpretative phenomenological analysis and existential hermeneutic phenomenology to reveal critical moments of managerial lived experience: a methodological guide,” Qual. Res. Organ. Manag., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 84-102, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2020-2024.
I. A. Urcia, “Comparisons of adaptations in grounded theory and phenomenology: Selecting the specific qualitative research methodology,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 20, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211045474.
J. Pilarska, “6 The Constructivist Paradigm and Phenomenological Qualitative Research Design,” in Research Paradigm Considerations for Emerging Scholars, pp. 64-83, 2021, https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845418281-008.
H. G. Larsen and P. Adu. The theoretical framework in phenomenological research: Development and application. Routledge. 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003084259.
T. Watanabe, “How to Develop Phenomenology as Psychology: from Description to Elucidation, Exemplified Based on a Study of Dream Analysis,” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, vol. 56, pp. 964–980, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09581-w.
E. D. S. Andrade and V. E. Cury, “Investigating the Experience of users in a Coexistence Community Center from the perspective of Humanistic Psychology and Phenomenology”, Phenomenological Studies, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 25–36, 2021, https://doi.org/10.18065/2021v27n1.3.
L. Law, “Digital creativity and ecolinguistics: An analysis of Final Fantasy VII Remake Intergrade,” Journal of Language and Pop Culture, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73–108, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlpop.24012.law.
R. Y. A. Hambali, “Being in the digital world: A Heideggerian perspective,” Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 274-287, 2023, https://doi.org/10.15575/jaqfi.v8i2.30889.
R. C. Scharff, “On making phenomenologies of technology more phenomenological,” Philos. Technol., vol. 35, p. 62, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00544-0.
S. Vidolov, “Uncovering the affective affordances of videoconference technologies,” Inf. Technol. People, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1782-1803, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2021-0329.
A. A. Alhazmi and A. Kaufmann, “Phenomenological qualitative methods applied to the analysis of cross-cultural experience in novel educational social contexts,” Frontiers in Psycholgy, vol. 13, p. 785134, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134.
B. Pula, “Does Phenomenology (Still) Matter? Three Phenomenological Traditions and Sociological Theory,” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, vol. 35, pp. 411–431, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-021-09404-9.
A. Rapp and A. Boldi, “Exploring the lived experience of behavior change technologies: Towards an existential model of behavior change for HCI,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 30, no. 6, p. 81, pp. 1-50, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1145/3603497.
M. Memon, T. Ramayah, H. Ting, and J.-H. Cheah, “Purposive Sampling: A Review and Guidelines for Quantitative Research,” Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, vol. 9, pp. 1–23, 2025, https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.9(1)01.
R. S. Robinson, “Purposive Sampling,” In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research, pp. 5645-5647, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2337.
M. Ahmad and S. Wilkins, “Purposive sampling in qualitative research: a framework for the entire journey,” Quality & Quantity, vol. 58, no. 2, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5.
F. Nyimbili and L. Nyimbili, “Types of purposive sampling techniques with their examples and application in qualitative research studies,” Brit. J. Multidiscip. Adv. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 90-99, 2024, https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419.
D. Hossan, Z. Dato Mansor, and N. S. Jaharuddin, “Research population and sampling in quantitative study,” Int. J. Bus. Technopreneurship (IJBT), vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 209–222, 2023, https://doi.org/10.58915/ijbt.v13i3.263.
C. Andrade, “The inconvenient truth about convenience and purposive samples,” Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 86-88, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000.
K. Leighton, S. Kardong-Edgren, T. Schneidereith, and C. Foisy-Doll, “Using social media and snowball sampling as an alternative recruitment strategy for research,” Clinical Simulation In Nursing, vol. 55, pp. 37-42, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.03.006.
S. K. Ahmed, “How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers,” Oral Oncology Reports (OOR), vol. 12, pp. 100662, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662.
H. Douglas, “Sampling techniques for qualitative research,” in Principles of Social Research Methodology, pp. 367-380, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_29.
O. A. Adeoye‐Olatunde and N. L. Olenik, “Research and scholarly methods: Semi‐structured interviews,” Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1358–1367, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1441.
E. Knott, A. H. Rao, K. Summers, and C. Teeger, “Interviews in the social sciences,” Nature Reviews Methods Primers, vol. 2, no. 73, pp. 1–13, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00150-6.
M. G. Henriksen, M. Englander, and J. Nordgaard, “Methods of data collection in psychopathology: the role of semi-structured, phenomenological interviews,” Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci., vol. 21, pp. 9–30, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09730-5.
A. Belina, “Semi-structured interviewing as a tool for understanding informal civil society,” Voluntary Sector Review, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 331-347, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1332/204080522X16454629995872.
Y. Voytenko Palgan, O. Mont, and S. Sulkakoski, “Governing the sharing economy: Towards a comprehensive analytical framework of municipal governance,” Cities, vol. 108, Art. 102994, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102994.
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Thematic analysis,” in Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, pp. 7187–7193, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_3470.
V. Braun, V. Clarke, and N. Hayfield, “‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 424–445, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1670765.m
K. Dhakal, “NVivo,” Journal of the Medical Library Association: Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA), vol. 110, no. 2, p. 270, 2022, https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1271.
M. K. Alam, “A systematic qualitative case study: questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation,” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-31, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825.
S. Dalkin, N. Forster, P. Hodgson, M. Lhussier, and S. M. Carr, “Using computer assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS; NVivo) to assist in the complex process of realist theory generation, refinement and testing,” International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 123–134, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1803528.
M. K. Alam, “A systematic qualitative case study: questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation,” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management (QROM), vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-31, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825.
W. M. Lim, “What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines,” Australasian Marketing Journal, vol. 0, no. 0, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619.
A. L. Nevedal, C. M. Reardon, M. A. Opra Widerquist, et al., “Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR),” Implementation Science, vol. 16, no. 67, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01111-5.
S. Park and M. Whang, “Empathy in Human-Robot Interaction: Designing for Social Robots,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 1889, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031889.
E. Gkintoni, S. P. Vassilopoulos, and G. Nikolaou, “Next-Generation Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression: Integrating Digital Tools, Teletherapy, and Personalization for Enhanced Mental Health Outcomes,” Medicina, vol. 61, no. 3, p. 431, Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030431.
P. Fatouros et al., “Randomized controlled study of a digital data driven intervention for depressive and generalized anxiety symptoms,” npj Digital Medicine, vol. 8, art. no. 113, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01511-7.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yih-Chang Chen, Chia-Ching Lin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
