Quick Menu
Certificate
Tools
Article Template
Citation Analysis
Indexing
Peer Review Process
Submitted papers are evaluated by anonymous referees by single-blind peer review for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation. The Editor shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible. The peer-review process can be seen in Figure 1.
The process can be described as follow.
1. The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated whether it is suitable for the Optimum: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similarity score by using Turnitin. The decision is rejected or accepted for a review process.
2. The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Single Blind Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses.
3. Afterward, the editorial team meeting suggested the final decision on the revised manuscript by the authors.
4. Finally, the Editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.
5. The accepted manuscript then continued to the copyediting and layout editing process to prepare the camera-ready paper.
Review Outcomes
Utilizing feedback from the peer review process, the Editor will make a final publication decision. Decisions categories include:
Figure 1. Peer Review Process
Quick Menu
Certificate
Tools
Article Template
Citation Analysis
Indexing
Optimum: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan
Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Kampus 1 Jalan Kapas 9 Yogyakarta 55166 INDONESIA
Phone: +62-274-563515
E-mail: optimum@uad.ac.id
p-ISSN: 1411-6022 | e-ISSN: 2613-9464
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License