Analyzing roles, challenges and opportunities the participants of “campus teaching program” in elementary school

Saepudin  Kartasasmita; Hariyanti    Hariyanti; Dini  Handayani; Anif  Istianah; Gigieh Cahya  Permady; Filma Alia  Sari

doi:10.12928/fundadikdas.v7i3.10287

Authors

Saepudin Kartasasmita Pancasila and Citizenship Education, Pamulang University
Hariyanti Hariyanti Pancasila and Citizenship Education, Riau University
Dini Handayani Pancasila and Citizenship Education, Pamulang University
Anif Istianah Pancasila and Citizenship Education, Nusa Cendana University
Gigieh Cahya Permady Polytechnic Sorong Shipping, Papua
Filma Alia Sari Economic Education, Riau University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/fundadikdas.v7i3.10287

Keywords:

Role, Challenges , Opportunities , Campus Teaching

Abstract

This article aims to describe How the roles, challenges, and opportunities of students who participate in campus programs teaching batches 3,4 and 6. Research conducted in Riau Province on 15 participants students, 4 Supervisors Field (DPL) head schools, and several teachers' councils school the basis on which school target. Research was done on a range time February 2022 to December 2023. Research data was collected through interviews and study documentation. Data analysis techniques using the Miles and Huberman model which consists of data collection, data verification and reduction, and data extraction conclusion. As for the triangulation technique use a triangulation data source. Research results find that there are a number of roles students as participants in campus teaching, namely; (1) planners, students discuss with DPL and supervising teachers For designing programs and strategies that will done at school target during the period of service; (2) implementer, during less than 4 months serve, then the program is about literacy numeracy, adaptation technology, and arrangement administration carried out by participants by creating a timeline so that all programs can be implemented effectively and appropriately time; (3) evaluator, participant do evaluation through pre-test and post-test AKM class for see condition beginning condition literacy numeracy in schools and conditions end after given assistance through implementation of campus programs teaching. The challenges faced by students are; (1) the location of the school's distant and remote targets; and (2) the Semester Credit System conversion system which is ambiguous. The chances include (1) campus teaching is a national program so that Power the recipient is more-big; (2) giving experience and expanding connection to students outside life campus; (3) getting incentives and assistance.

References

E. Tobing et al., Buku Panduan Kampus Mengajar angkatan 3 tahun 2022. 2022.

Dwi Noerbella, “Implementasi Program Kampus Mengajar Angkatan 2 Dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Literasi Dan Numerasi Peserta Didik,” J. Cakrawala Pendas, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 480–489, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.31949/jcp.v8i2.2087.

R. Suhaili, C. Charles, and H. Harvius, “Analisis pendidikan dan pengajaran dalam al-Qur’an,” J. Penelit. Ilmu Pendidik. Indones., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 255–260, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.31004/jpion.v1i2.51.

L. Labadze, M. Grigolia, and L. Machaidze, “Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 56, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1.

H.- Hastuti, “Mohammad Sjafe’I Dan Konsepsi Pemikiran Pendidikan Ruang Pendidik Ins Kayutanam,” Istor. J. Pendidik. dan Ilmu Sej., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3–15, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.21831/istoria.v16i1.29833.

S. J. BALL, “Big Policies/Small World: An introduction to international perspectives in education policy,” Comp. Educ., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 119–130, Jun. 1998, doi: 10.1080/03050069828225.

A. Drigas, G. Papanastasiou, and C. Skianis, “The school of the future: The role of digital technologies, metacognition and emotional intelligence,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 18, no. 09, pp. 65–85, May 2023, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v18i09.38133.

L. Hasan, “Konsep pendidikan dan pelatihan dalam manajemen sumber daya manusia,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. Guru Sekol. Dasar, vol. 6, no. August, p. 128, 2016.

T. program kampus Mengajar, buku panduan kampus mengajar angkatan 4. 2022.

Hariyanti, “Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter Melalui Program Kampus Mengajar di Sekolah Dasar,” Jurnl Moral Kemasyarakatan, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 133–146, 2023. doi: 10.21067/jmk.v8i2.8326

T. P. K. Mengajar, “Buku Panduan Kampus Mengajar Angkatan 6 Tahun 2023,” 2023.

R. fahruza siregar Rini ramadani, “Analisis peran dosen pembimbing lapangan dan mahasiswa kampus mengajar angkatan 4 di SD Negeri 101805 di Batu Rejo,” J. Math. Educ. Sigma [JMES], vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 36–47, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.30596/jmes.v4i1.13608.

A. Saefullah, Elya Nurzanah, Adinda Novita Andhini, and Evi Fauziah Mitagani, “Sosialisasi Peran Dosen dan Mahasiswa dalam Kampus Mengajar Angkatan 4 Tahun 2022 di SDN 03 Sukadana,” ABDISOSHUM J. Pengabdi. Masy. Bid. Sos. dan Hum., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 454–465, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.55123/abdisoshum.v1i4.1259.

Amriani Amriani, Siti Suryani, and Nurul Fitriani, “Peran Mahasiswa Kampus Mengajar Angkatan Lima dalam Adaptasi Teknologi di SD Inpres Bistio,” Inspirasi Dunia J. Ris. Pendidik. dan Bhs., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 127–135, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.58192/insdun.v2i4.1470.

A. Waldi, N. M. Putri, I. Indra, V. Ridalfich, D. Mulyani, and E. Mardianti, “Peran Kampus Mengajar dalam Meningkatkan Literasi, Numerasi dan Adaptasi Teknologi Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar di Sumatera Barat,” J. Civ. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 284–292, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.24036/jce.v5i3.725.

M. R. Fadli, “Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif,” Humanika, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 33–54, 2021, doi: 10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075.

M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, “Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft,” Educ. Res., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 20–30, May 1984, doi: 10.3102/0013189X013005020.

J. Wilson Sitopu, “Pelaksanaan Kampus Mengajar Di Sdit Ashabul Kahfi Kabupaten Deliserdang,” Pendas J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. VII, no. Volume 7 Nomor 1 Juni 2022, pp. 39–50, 2022, doi: 10.23969/jp.v7i1.5362.

R. Lindawati, “Bakti untuk Negeri melalui Program Kampus Mengajar: Sharing Session,” J. Abdidas, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 176–180, 2022, doi: 10.31004/abdidas.v3i1.556.

E. L. Utami, A. Mulyadiprana, and E. R. Saputra, “Peran Program Kampus Mengajar Angkatan 5 dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar,” Edu Cendikia J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 3, no. 02, pp. 302–312, 2023, doi: 10.47709/educendikia.v3i02.2550.

S. D. Pardede, S. Pardede, and H. A. Siregar, “Analisis Kegiatan Kampus Mengajar untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 5422–5431, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3278.

A. Widiyono, S. Irfana, and K. Firdausia, “Implementasi Merdeka Belajar melalui Kampus Mengajar Perintis di Sekolah Dasar,” Metod. Didakt., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 102–107, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.17509/md.v16i2.30125.

S. Lestari, K. Fatonah, and A. Halim, “Mewujudkan Merdeka Belajar: Studi Kasus Program Kampus Mengajar di Sekolah Dasar Swasta di Jakarta,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 6426–6438, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1679.

W. W. W. P. Net, S. Sumani, A. Kadafi, L. K. D. Purnomosasi, and P. A. T. Prasasti, “The Impact of ‘ Kampus Mengajar MBKM Program ’ on Students ’ Social Skills,” vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 220–225, 2022, doi: 10.47750/pegegog.12.03.23.

Yorri Didit Setyadi, Dwi Wulandari, Lutfi Dwi Lestari, Wa Ode Meliasari, and Ifit Novita Sari, “Peran Mahasiswa Kampus Mengajar 2 Sebagai ‘Agent Of Change dan Social Control,’” Din. J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1542–1547, 2021, doi: 10.31849/dinamisia.v5i6.8592.

H. Hariyanti, G. Cahya Permady, I. Irayanti, F. Alia Sari, A. Istianah, and L. Retnasari, “Campus teaching: an effort to enchance the primary education quality in remote area,” J. Fundadikdas (Fundamental Pendidik. Dasar), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 121–137, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.12928/fundadikdas.v6i2.7850.