EFL Learners' Preference for Corrective Feedback Strategies in Relation to Their Self-Perceived Levels of Proficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v5i1.4403Keywords:
corrective feedback, error correction, preference, English proficiency, Rajabhat studentAbstract
The purpose of this work was to address the overarching questions of how EFL Thai learners preferred corrective feedback strategies and whether there were any significant differences in preferences across learners’ language ability levels. The quantitative study collected 418 Thai EFL learners’ preferences for corrective feedback via a closed-ended Likert scale questionnaire. The survey showed that learners desired to edit when their speech or writing contained errors, particularly when the wrong utterance was responded to with a metalinguistic comment regarding the error’s nature. Statistical analysis found significant differences in students’ preferences for metalinguistic clues and public feedback between intermediate and elementary levels. It appeared that beginner-level learners would almost certainly experience embarrassment if they were corrected in front of their peers. Conversely, self-correction, which was necessary once the student’s erroneous remark was explained in terms of grammar usage, probably made advanced students uncomfortable. While teachers should examine their EFL students' corrective feedback preferences, this study found that their proficiency levels were slightly relevant.
References
Al Hajiri, F., & Al-Mahrooqi, R. (2013). Student perceptions and preferences concerning instructors’ corrective feedback. The Asian EFL Journal, 70, 28–53.
Aliakbari, M. A., & Raeesi, H. (2014). Teacher's feedback and student's preferences in an advanced writing course: A case study. Advances in Language and Literacy Studies, 5(1), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.1p.62
Alhaysony, M. (2016). Saudi EFL preparatory year students' perception about corrective feedback in oral communication. English Language Teaching, 9(12). 47–61.
Alnasser, S. M., & Alyousef, H. S. (2015). Investigating Saudi learners’ preferences for giving and receiving macro and/or micro level peer feedback on their writing. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p57
Amador, Y. A. (2008). Learner attitude toward error correction in a beginners English class. Revista Comunicación, 17(1), 18–28.
Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers prefer and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics,13(2), 95–127.
Austen, L., & Malone, C. (2018). What students’ want in written feedback: Praise, clarity and precise individual commentary. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 11(1), 47–58.
Bao, R. (2019). Oral corrective feedback in L2 Chinese classes: Teachers’ beliefs versus their practices. System, 82, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.004
Bitchener, J. (2012). A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 348–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.006
Black, D. A., & Nanni, A. (2016). Written corrective feedback: Preferences and justifications of teachers and students in a Thai context. Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2016-1603-07
Bruton, A., & Samuda, V. (1980). Learner and teacher roles in the treatment of oral error in group work. RELC Journal, 11(2), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828001100204
Bryfonski, L., & Ma, X. (2019). Effect of implicit versus explicit corrective feedback on Mandarin tone acquisition in a SCMS learning environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 61-88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000317
Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: A case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0010-y
Chung, B. (2015). Corrective feedback: The perception of Korean EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 75–88.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Diab, N. M. (2015). Effectives of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter? Assessing Writing, 24, 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
Ellis, R. (2017). Oral corrective feedback in L2 classrooms: What we know so far. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Routledge.
Elwood, J. A., & Bode, J. (2014). Student preferences vis-à-vis teacher feedback in university EFL writing classes in Japan. System, 42, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.023
Fry, G. W., & Bi, H. (2013). The evolution of educational reform in Thailand: The Thai educational paradox. Journal of Educational Administration, 51, 290–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311311483
Giguère, C., & Parks, S. (2018). Child-to-child interaction during eTandem ESL-FSL chat exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 176–192. https://doi.org/10125/44663
Gooch, R., Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2016). Effects of recasts and prompts on L2 pronunciation development: Teaching English /r/ to Korean adult EFL learners, System, 60, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.06.007
Hamouda, A. (2011). A study of students and teachers’ preferences and attitudes towards correction of classroom written errors in Saudi EFL context. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p128
Hyland, K. (2013). Student perceptions of hidden messages in teacher written feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.06.003
Irwin, B. (2017). Written corrective feedback: Student preferences and teacher feedback practices. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 3(2), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.22492/ijll.3.202
Jolley, K. (2019). Student perceptions of group writing processes and feedback. In F. Meunier, J. Van de Vyver, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL and complexity – short papers from EUROCALL 2019 (pp. 212–217). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.38.1011
Jones, L. A. (2014). Losing the red pen: Video grading feedback in distance and blended learning writing courses. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association Supporting Computer Users in Education (ASCUE), Myrtle Beach, SC, Jun, 8-12, 2014.
Kaivanpanah, S., Alavi, S. M., & Sepehrinia, S. (2015). Preferences for interactional feedback: Differences between learners and teachers. The Language Learning Journal, 43(1), 74–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.705571
Károly, A. (2015). Feedback on individual academic presentations: Exploring Finnish university students' experiences and preferences. In J. Jalkanen, E. Jokinen, & P. Taalas (Eds.), Voices of pedagogical development - Expanding, enhancing and exploring higher education language learning (pp. 105–130). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.705571
Katayama, A. (2006). Perceptions of JFL students toward correction of oral errors. In K. Bradford-Watts, C. Ikeguchi, & M. Swanson (Eds.), JALT2005 Conference Proceedings. JALT.
Katayama, A. (2007). Learners’ perceptions toward oral error correction. In K. Bradford-Watts (Ed.), JALT2006 Conference Proceedings (pp. 284–299). JALT.
Kayar, A., & Veyis, F. (2020). An analysis of grammar teaching in secondary school in terms of success, attitude and teachers’ views. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 6, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2020.62.149.160
Kılıçkaya, F. (2019). Pre-service language teachers’ online written corrective feedback preferences and timing of feedback in computer-supported L2 grammar instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1668811
Lee, E. J. (2013). Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students. System, 41(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.022
Lee, E. J. (2016). Advanced ESL students’ prior EFL education and their perceptions of oral corrective feedback. Journal of International Students, 6(3), 798–816.
Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
Li, H., & He, Q. (2017). Chinese secondary EFL learners’ and teachers’ preferences for types of written corrective feedback. English Language Teaching, 10, 63–73. http://dx.doi.org/%2010.5539/elt.v10n3p63
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of correct feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x
Li, S., & Roshan, S. (2019). The associations between working memory and the effects of four differences types of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.003
Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System. System, 84, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034
Morris, C., & Chikwa, G. (2016). Audio versus written feedback: Exploring learners' preference and the impact of feedback format on students' academic performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416637482
Morris, F. (2005). Child-to-child interaction and corrective feedback in a computer mediated L2 class. Language Learning & Technology, 9, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416637482
Moslemi, N., & Dastgoshadeh, A. (2017). The relationship between cognitive styles and young adult learners’ preferences for written corrective feedback. HOW, 24(2), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.24.2.338
Nemati, M., Alavi, S. M., Mohebbi, H., & Masjedlou, A. P. (2017). Speaking out on behalf of the voiceless learners: Written corrective feedback for English language learners in Iran. Issues in Educational Research, 27, 822–841.
Nurie, Y. (2018). Doctoral students' perceived needs and preferences for supervisors' written feedback. PASAA, 56, 112–144.
Orts, S., & Salazar, P. (2016). EFL students’ preferences towards written corrective feedback: An exploratory study on age and level of proficiency. The Grove - Working Papers on English Studies, 23, 109–129. https://doi.org/10.17561/grove.v23.a8
Papangkorn, P. (2015). SSRUIC students’ attitude and preference toward error corrections. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1841–1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.244
Parkes, M., & Fletcher, P. (2017). A longitudinal, quantitative study of student attitudes towards audio feedback for assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(7), 1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1224810
Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2014). Peer interaction and second language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Quinn, P. G., & Nakata, T. (2017). The timing of oral corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 35–47). New York, NY: Routledge.
Qutob, M. M., & Madini, A. A. (2020). Saudi EFL learners’ preferences of the corrective feedback on written assignment. English Language Teaching, 13(2), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n2p16
Rassaei, E. (2015). Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and L2 development. System, 49, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.01.002
Roy, S. (2019). Exploring multilingual writers’ preference between audio and written feedback, and the impact of feedback format on their revision process in a U.S. composition class. PhD diss., Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Saeli, H., & Cheng, A. (2019). Student writers’ affective engagement with grammar-centred written corrective feedback: the impact of (mis)aligned practices and perceptions. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 109–132.
Şakiroğlu, H. Ü. (2020). Oral corrective feedback preferences of university students in English communication classes. International Journal of Research in Education and Science. 6(1), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.806
Sanu, L. O. (2016). EFL students’ preferences toward the lecturer’s corrective feedback in business letters writing. Dinamika Ilmu, 16(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v16i2.311
Sato, M. (2017). Oral peer corrective feedback: Multiple theoretical perspectives. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 19–34). New York, NY: Routledge.
Schulz, R. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107
Scrivener, L. (2005). Learning teaching: A guidebook for English language teachers (2nd ed.). London: MacMillan Education.
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 286–306. https://doi.org/10.%201016/j.jslw.2013.03.011
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2015). Does language analytical ability mediate the effect of written feedback on grammatical accuracy in second language writing? System, 49, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.01.006
Suzuki, W., Nassaji, H., & Sato, K. (2019). The effects of feedback explicitness and type of target structure on accuracy in revision and new pieces of writing. System, 81, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.017
Tasdemir, M. S., & Yalcin Arslan, F. (2018). Feedback preferences of EFL learners with respect to their learning styles. Cogent Education, 5(1), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1481560
Trabelsi, S. (2018). The perceptions and preferences of the general foundation programme students regarding written corrective feedback in an Omani EFL context. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.1p.91
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
Ur, P. (2012). A course in English language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Wanchid, R. (2015). Different sequences of feedback types: Effectiveness, attitudes, and preferences. PASAA, 50, 31–64.
Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolysarin, K., & Jinowat, N. (2020). Learners’ oral corrective feedback perceptions and preferences in Thai as a foreign language tertiary setting. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 912–929. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759344
Yang, J. (2016). Learners' oral corrective feedback preferences in relation to their cultural background, proficiency level and types of error. System, 61, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.08.004
Zhan, L. (2016). Written teacher feedback: Student perceptions, teacher perceptions, and actual teacher performance. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n8p73
Zhang, L. J., & Rahimi, M. (2014). EFL learners’ anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes. System, 42, 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.012
Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kanokpan Wiboolyasarin, Watcharapol Wiboolyasarin, Nattawut Jinowat, Ruedee Kamonsawad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
