Exploring How Silence Communicates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i1.1939Keywords:
silence, talk, mental processing, inner speech, private speechAbstract
This article argues that silence as communication can be academically practised in the classroom as much as talk, simply because talk and silence are both essential components of everyday interaction (Nakane, 2012). These two constructs are interdependent in the sense that one would not exist without the other. Silence can be practised in two different ways: one is to employ it as a mental processing process in learning; two is to observe and discuss how silence is used in communication. The article begins by sharing the literature review on how silence works in education, how it deserves a place in SLS theorisation, and how it constitutes communication competence. Secondly, it highlights classroom tasks that trigger silent processing and explain why this is the case. Thirdly, the discussion recommends an activity which addresses the value of silence, which was developed by the author through research and experience. Finally, there are recommendations for task design in which similar activity types are introduced to assist the learning of reflective students.
References
Bao, D. (2019). The place of silence in second language acquisition. English Language Teaching & Research 1 (1), August 2019, pp. 26-42.
Bao, D. (2014). Understanding silence and reticence: Ways of participating in second language acquisition. London: Bloomsbury.
Belanoff, P. (2001). ‘Silence: reflection, literacy, learning, and teaching’, College Composition and Communication, 52(3), 399-428.
Canale, M. and Swain, M. (l980). ‘Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing’, Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.
Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z. and Thurrell, S. (1995). ‘A pedagogical framework for communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications’, Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5–35.
Chambers, J. (2007). ‘Silence in SLA research: from personality to identity’. J-Quotes: A Quest for Great Ideas web-site. Retrieved 24 June 2013 at http://j- quote.blogspot.com.au/2007/12/silence-in-sla-research-from.html
Colligan, R. C. (1979). ‘Predictive validity of the Myklebust Pupil Rating Scales: A two-year follow up’. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 264-7.
Creelman, A. (2017) Silent learners – a guide. Copenhagen: Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers, accessed 6 November 2018. http://lnu.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:1171709/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Dulay, H., Burt, M. and Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edwards, A. D. and Westgate, D. P. G. (1987). Investigating classroom talk. London: The Falmer Press.
Ehrich, J. F. (2006). ‘Vygotskyan inner speech and the reading process’. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 6, 12-25.
Feshbach, S., Adelman, H. and Fuller, W. W. (1974). ‘Early identification of children with high risk of learning failure’. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 49-54.
Frawley, W. (1997). Vygotsky and cognitive science: Language and the unification of the social and computational mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gibbons, J. (1985). ‘The silent period: An examination’, Language Learning, 35(2), 255-67.
Gilmore, P. (1985) Silence and sulking: Emotional displays in the classroom. In D. Tannen and M. Saville-Troike (eds.) Perspectives on silence (pp. 139-162). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Gordon, E. M. and Thomas, A. (1967). ‘Children's behavioural style and the teacher's appraisal of their intelligence’, Journal of School Psychology, 5(4), 292-300.
Granger, C. A. (2004). Silence in second language learning: A psychoanalytic reading. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Gunawardena, C. N., Nolla, A. C., Wilson, P. L., Lopez Islas, J. R., Ramirez-Angel, N. and Megchun- Alpizar, R. M. (2001). ‘A cross-cultural study of group processes and development in online conferences’, Distance Education: An International Journal,22(1), 85-121.
Harder, P. (1980). ‘Discourse as self-expression: On the reduced personality of the second- language learner’, Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 262-70.
Karmen, M. (2001). Immemorial silence. New York: State University of New York Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Harlow: Longman.
Leh, A. S. C. (2001). ‘Computer-mediated communication and social presence in a distance learning environment’. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7, 109-28.
Nakane, I. (2012). 9 Silence. The handbook of intercultural discourse and communication, 29, 158.
Oxford, R. (2001). ‘Language learning styles and strategies’, in M. Celce-Murcia M (ed), Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle, pp. 359-66.
Saville-Troike, M. (1987). ‘Bilingual discourse: Communication without a common language’. Linguistics, 25, 81-106.
Saville-Troike, M. (1988). ‘Private speech: Evidence for language learning strategies during the ‘silent’ period’, Journal of Child Language, 15(3), 567-90.
Stevenson, H. W., Parker T., Wilkinson, A., Hegion, A., and Fish, E. (1976). ‘Predictive value of teacher ratings with young children’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 507-17.
Stickler, U., Batstone, C., Duensing, A., and Heins, B. (2007) Distant classmates: Speech silence in online and telephone language tutorials. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning 10 (2), accessed 19 November 2018. http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2007&halfyear=2&..&article=277
Vassilopoulos, S., and Konstantinidis, G. (2012) Teacher use of silence in elementary education. Journal of Teaching and Learning 8(1), 91-105.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). ‘Thought and language’, in A. Kozulin (ed). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Wilkinson, L., and Olliver-Gray, Y. (2006) The significance of silence: Differences in meaning, learning styles, and teaching strategies in cross-cultural settings. Psychologia 49(2), 74-88.
Winegar, L. (1997). ‘Can internalization be more than a magical phrase? Notes toward the constructive negotiation of this process’, in C. Lightfoot and B. Cox (eds), Sociogenetic Perspectives on Internalization. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zembylas, M. (2008). ‘The sound of silence in educational pedagogy,’ Educational Theory, 54(2), 193-210.
Zembylas, M. and Vrasidas, C. (2007). ‘Listening for silence in text-based, online encounters’, Distant Education, 28(1), 5-24.
Zembylas, M., and Michaelides, P. (2004) The sound of silence in pedagogy. Educational Theory 54(2), 193-210.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
