From linguistic tokens and functions into English language teaching pedagogical tools: Exploring schoolscape in Marawi’s Islamic and integrated school
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v9i2.16751Keywords:
English language learning and teaching, Linguistic functions, Linguistic landscapes, Linguistic tokens, SchoolscapesAbstract
Schoolscape, a focused strand of linguistic landscape research, refers to the linguistic displays in school environments that reflect institutional ideologies, language practices, and pedagogical priorities. This study qualitatively examines the schoolscape of Dhayfullah Islamic Institute Foundation (DIIF) in Marawi City, Philippines, with particular attention to the extent of English representation and its role in facilitating English language teaching and learning among learners and teachers. Data were collected through systematic photographic documentation of school-based signs, complemented by in-depth interviews with administrators, English teachers, and selected students. The signs were analyzed through linguistic and functional classification, while interview transcriptions were examined thematically and compared with the visual findings to identify converging and divergent perspectives. The findings reveal that English-only signs were highly visible with 58.24% of the schoolscape. Additional multilingual signs, combining English with Arabic and Filipino, constituted 35.71% of the corpus, indicating that multilingual representation was present but less prominent than English. Participants perceived the schoolscape as a useful environmental linguistic resource that provides repeated exposure to English, reinforces classroom learning, supports incidental vocabulary engagement, and creates low-stakes opportunities for language use. The study does not establish measurable learning gains or treat schoolscape as a tested instructional intervention. However, it shows how systematically designed linguistic displays can complement formal instruction, while more intentional multilingual representation can strengthen the cultural and linguistic inclusivity of the school environment.References
Abbas, J. H., Samad, B. M. A., Imam, M. H. M., & Berowa, A. M. C. (2022). Visuals to Ideologies: Exploring the Linguistic Landscapes of Mindanao State University Marawi Campus. Lingua Cultura, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.8406
Algryani, A., & Syahrin, S. (2021). Utilizing learners’ linguistic landscape as a pedagogical resource in the translation classroom: A case study in the Sultanate of Oman. Arab World English Journal, 12(1), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.24
Astillero, S. F. (2017). Linguistic schoolscape: Studying the place of English and Philippine languages of Irosin Secondary School. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 4 (4), 30-37.
Backhaus, P. (2006). Multilingualism in Tokyo: A look into the linguistic landscape International Journal of Multilingualism, 3 (1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668385
Bernardo, A. S. (2024). Teaching Philippine English through schoolscapes. World Englishes, 43, 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12673
Brown, J. D. (2012). Language policy and schoolscapes: The role of language in shaping educational environments. Language Policy, 11(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9214-6
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2006). Linguistic landscape and minority languages. In D. Gorter (Ed.), Linguistic landscape: A new approach to multilingualism (pp. 67–80). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599170-005
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2008). The linguistic landscape as an additional source of input in second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46(3), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2008.012
Da Silva, A. M. (2023). Linguistic landscape projects as English teaching and learning resources: A review. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v7i2.15970
De Los Reyes, R. A. (2014). Language of “order”: English in the linguistic landscape of two major train stations in the Philippines. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 2(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.59960/2.a2
Dressler, R. (2015). Signgeist: Promoting bilingualism through the linguistic landscape of school signage. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(1), 128-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2014.912282
Dumanig, F. P., & David, M. K. (2019). Linguistic landscape as a pedagogical tool in teaching and learning English in Oman. Modern Journal of Studies in English Language Teaching and Literature, 1, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.56498/11201988
Eliawati, D., Ngadiso, & Adi Putra, K. (2024). Linguistic schoolscapes as the resource for teaching and learning English in an Indonesian Islamic boarding school. Beyond Boundaries: Innovations in Arabic and English Language Teaching for the Future, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v9i1.787
Fajardo-Dack, T., Argudo-Serrano, J., Abad-Célleri, M., & Ordóñez Alvarado, P. (2024). The potential of linguistic landscapes for the teaching of English as a foreign language in Cuenca, Ecuador. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.8
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
Gorter, D. (2013). Linguistic landscapes in a multilingual world. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190513000051
Gorter, D. (2018). Linguistic landscapes and trends in the study of schoolscapes. Linguistics and Education, 44, 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.10.001
Gorter, D., & Cenoz, J. (2015). Translanguaging and linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape: An International Journal, 1(1-2), 54-74. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.04gor
Gorter, D., & Cenoz, J. (2017). Linguistic landscape and multilingualism. In J. Cenoz, D. Gorter, & S. May (Eds.), Language awareness and multilingualism (pp. 233–245). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02240-6_27
Gorter, D., Cenoz, J., & der Worp, K. van. (2021). The linguistic landscape as a resource for language learning and raising language awareness. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 8(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2021.2014029
Guo, Y., & Zhao, B. (2021). The discourse communication function of urban linguistic landscape. The Discourse Communication Function of Urban Linguistic Landscape, 537, 86-89. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210313.016
Hancock, A. (2022). Chinese students’ engagement with linguistic landscapes during a summer school in Scotland. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(10), 3568–3579. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2066970
Hult, F. M. (2014). Drive-thru linguistic landscaping: Constructing a linguistically dominant place in a bilingual space. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(5), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913484206
Im, J.-H. (2023). The linguistic landscape as an identity construction site of a United States’ higher educational institution in the time of COVID-19. Education as Change, 27, Article 11405. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/11405
Indrasanti, L., & Wita, F. R. (2023). Language, religion, and identity negotiation in Indonesian Islamic boarding schools: A sociolinguistic ethnography. Jurnal Tahuri, 20(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.30598/tahurivol20issue2page155-172
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
Krompák, E., Fernández-Mallat, V., & Meyer, S. (2022). The symbolic value of educations scapes: Expanding the intersections between linguistic landscape and education. In E. Krompák, V. Fernández-Mallat, & S. Meyer (Eds.), Linguistic landscapes and educational spaces (pp. 1–27). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788923873-003
Landry, R., & Bourhis R. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16 (1), 23-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002
Latip-Yusoph, S. (2016). Language trends in social media: Manifestations of Meranaws’ use of English on Facebook. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 6(7), 480–493. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8080/2016.07.003
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
Lomangco, S. H. M. (2025). MTB-MLE classroom interactions: A pedagogical analysis of language functions among Meranaw Grade 1. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 7(6), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v7i6.2051
Magno, J. (2017). Linguistic landscape in Cebu City higher education offering communication programs. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5 (1), 94-103.
Mahboob, A., & Cruz, P. (2013). English and mother-tongue-based multilingual education: Language attitudes in the Philippines. Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS), 1, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.59960/1.a1
Malinowski, D. (2015). Opening spaces of learning in the linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1–2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.06mal
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Menken, K., Pérez Rosario, A., & Guzmán Valerio, C. (2018). Increasing multilingualism in schoolscapes: New scenery and language education policies. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15(3), 289-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2018.1462950
Muriungi, S. W., & Mudogo, B. A. (2021). Linguistic landscape in a multilingual context: A case of Kenyan universities. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 24(2), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v24i2.3673
Nurseha, I. (2025). Pesantren-based bilingual education: Bridging Arabic, English, and local languages. JALIE: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Islamic Education, 9(2), 215–226. DOI:10.33754/jalie.v9i2.1686
Pennycook, A. (2008). Linguistic landscapes and the transgressive semiotics of graffiti. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 342–352). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930960-29
Reintegrado-Celino, J., & Bernardo, A. (2023). From signage to Language ideologies: Exploring the schoolscape of a comprehensive university. Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS), 11, 81-116. https://doi.org/10.59960/11.a4
Riadi, A., & Warti, F. W. (2021). Linguistic Landscape: A Language Learning Media in An Underdeveloped Region. Indonesian TESOL Journal, 3(1), 46-67. https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v3i1.1782
Rohmah, Z., Sholihah, D. N., Basthomi, Y., & Milal, A. D. (2024). School-scape as a linguistic battlefield: An LL study at Darussalam Education Complex of Gontor, Indonesia. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), Article 2348301. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2348301tandfonline
Sadiq, N. (2024). Linguistic schoolscape at a private university in Yogyakarta: A geosemiotic analysis. Linguistik Indonesia, 42(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v42i2.546
Schvarcz, B. R., & Warren, A. N. (2025). Creating multilingual schoolscapes in restrictive ELT contexts. ELT Journal, 79(3), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaf028
Shohamy, E. (2015). LL research as expanding language and language policy. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1–2), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.09sho
Shohamy, E., & Waksman, S. (2009). Linguistic landscapes as an ecological arena: Modalities, meanings, negotiations, education. In E. Shohamy, & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 313–331). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930960
Spolsky, B., & Cooper, R. L. (1991). The languages of Jerusalem. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198239086.001.0001
Stroud, C., & Mpendukana, S. (2009). Towards a material ethnography of linguistic landscape: Multilingualism, mobility and space in a South African township. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00410.xdiscovery.ucl
Szabó, T. P., & Brown, K. D. (2025). Schoolscapes: A linguistic landscape approach to learning environments. In D. Gorter & J. Cenoz (Eds.), The handbook of linguistic landscapes and multilingualism. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394231805.ch31
Tupas, R. (2024). Unequal Englishes in the linguistic landscape: Tracing desires, ideologies and class through public signs. Journal of Education, Language, and Ideology, 2 (1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.67372/9k7qbw75
van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–259). Oxford University Press.
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5
Wang, J. (2015). Linguistic landscape on campus in Japan— A case study of signs in Kyushu University. Intercultural Communication Studies, 24 (1). 123-144. https://www.sciltp.com/journals/ics/articles/2015061003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Juhaid H. H. Abbas, Annie Mae C. Berowa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



