Course-level learner engagement across face-to-face and synchronous online EFL learning: A mixed-methods study in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v9i2.16641Keywords:
EFL context, English language learning and teaching, Face-to-face learning, Linguistic university students, Synchronous online learningAbstract
In recent years, learner engagement has received increasing attention due to its significant role in second language acquisition. However, few studies have compared course-level engagement across face-to-face (FTF) and synchronous online learning modalities among Vietnamese EFL university students. This study aims to address this gap by employing a mixed-methods research design to investigate the engagement of 132 university-level English-major students from the same cohort, all enrolled in a Reading and Writing 2 course at a public university in Vietnam. Participants experienced both traditional FTF and synchronous online learning environments. Quantitative data were collected via an adapted version of a validated engagement survey measuring behavioural, emotional, and cognitive dimensions of engagement. This was complemented by semi-structured interviews with selected participants to gain deeper insights into their experiences and perceptions. The quantitative results suggested that higher levels of behavioural and emotional engagement may be associated with FTF learning, while cognitive engagement remained relatively consistent across both modalities. The qualitative findings revealed that most participants preferred a blended learning format that combines the immediacy and interactional energy of FTF interaction with the flexibility of online learning. The findings highlight differences in engagement across online and FTF modalities, providing a basis for future research to investigate whether combining elements of both modalities can support multidimensional engagement.
References
Alzahrani, I. H. (2025). The relationship between students' L2 engagement and learning success. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 16(1), 266-273. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1601.27
Aubrey, S. (2022). Dynamic engagement in second language computer-mediated collaborative writing tasks: Does communication mode matter? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12, 59-86. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.1.4
Bao, D. (2023). The impacts of the global pandemic on online learning in Vietnam. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 6(2), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v6i2.9217
Bazeley, P. (2024). Conceptualizing Integration in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(3), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241253636
Bonner, E., Garvey, K., Miner, M., Godin, S., & Reinders, H. (2023). Measuring real-time learner engagement in the Japanese EFL classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 254-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.2025379
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carver, C., Jung, D., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2021). Examining learner engagement in relationship to learning and communication mode. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 120–142). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788923613
Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S14-S30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998
Dao, P. (2024). Learner engagement in online second language classrooms. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71750-5
Dao, P., Nguyen, M. X. N. C., Duong, P.-T., & Tran–Thanh, V. (2021). Learners’ engagement in L2 computer-mediated interaction: chat mode, interlocutor familiarity, and text quality. The Modern Language Journal, 105(4), 767-791. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12737
Dao, P., Nguyen, M. X. N. C., & Iwashita, N. (2021). Teachers' Perceptions of Learner Engagement in L2 Classroom Task-Based Interaction. Language Learning Journal, 49(6), 711-724. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1666908
Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm and students’ social-behavioral learning engagement: The mediating role of student enjoyment and boredom in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 922-945. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211014538
Eerdemutu, L., Dewaele, J.-M., & Wang, J. (2024). Developing a short language classroom engagement scale (LCES) and linking it with needs satisfaction and achievement. System, 120, 103189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103189
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Guo, Y., Xu, J., & Chen, C. (2025). Learner engagement in the tertiary EFL classroom: trajectories and contributing factors. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-025-00988-w
Han, J., Geng, X., & Wang, Q. (2021). Sustainable development of university EFL learners' engagement, satisfaction, and self-efficacy in online learning environments: Chinese experiences. Sustainability, 13(21), 11655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111655
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Mercer, S. (Eds.). (2021). Student engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788923613.
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2024). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289
Hoang, D. T. N., & Hoang, T. (2024). Enhancing EFL students’ academic writing skills in online learning via Google Docs-based collaboration: a mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(7), 1504-1526. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2083176
Horn, D., & Prentiss, S. (2026). Exploring communication anxiety and apprehension : research, pedagogy and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003614166
Kankaraš, M., & Capecchi, S. (2024). Neither agree nor disagree: use and misuse of the neutral response category in Likert-type scales. METRON, 83(1), 111-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-024-00276-5
Kara, M. (2022). Revisiting online learner engagement: exploring the role of learner characteristics in an emergency period. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S236-S252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891997
Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432-479. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891
Li, Z., & Li, J. (2022). Using the flipped classroom to promote learner engagement for the sustainable development of language skills: A mixed-methods study. Sustainability, 14(10), 5983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105983
Martin, F., & Borup, J. (2022). Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research themes, and supportive practices. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 162-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089147
Mercer, S. (2019). Language Learner Engagement: Setting the Scene. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 1-19). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_40-1
Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024563
Phan, H. L. T., & Dao, P. (2023). Engagement in collaborative writing: Exploring learners’ control of task content and text quality. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 242-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12462
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094
Qiu, X. (2024). Revisiting the Cognition Hypothesis: the impact of task complexity on L2 learner engagement in task performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(7), 2028-2050. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2142245
Qiu, X., & Bui, G. (2022). Pre-task planning effects on learner engagement in face-to-face and synchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221135280
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2022). Jingle-Jangle Revisited: History and Further Evolution of the Student Engagement Construct. In A. L. Reschly & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 3-24). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_1
Salas‐Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 593-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190
Salta, K., Paschalidou, K., Tsetseri, M., & Koulougliotis, D. (2022). Shift from a Traditional to a Distance Learning Environment during the COVID-19 Pandemic: University Students' Engagement and Interactions. Science & Education, 31(1), 93-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00234-x
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The Challenges of Defining and Measuring Student Engagement in Science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental Dynamics of Student Engagement, Coping, and Everyday Resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 21-44). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
Sulis, G. (2022). Engagement in the foreign language classroom: Micro and macro perspectives. System, 110, 102902-102915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102902
Sun, P. P., & Zhang, L. J. (2024). Investigating the Effects of Chinese University Students’ Online Engagement on Their EFL Learning Outcomes. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(4), 747-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00800-7
Tai, T.-Y., & Chen, H. H.-J. (2024). Improving elementary EFL speaking skills with generative AI chatbots: Exploring individual and paired interactions. Computers & Education, 220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105112
Tai, T.-Y., & Chen, H. H.-J. (2025). Impact of generative AI chatbots and interaction modes on the speaking proficiency of adolescent EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2572999
Taufique, K. M. R., Sabbir, M. M., & Rabbanee, F. K. (2026). A Guide to Key Decision Criteria for Likert-Scale Use in Survey Research. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 45(5), 493-508. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.70032
Tsai, Y.-R. (2024). Leveraging gamification to enhance motivation and engagement among EFL learners. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 7(3), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v7i3.12010
Vo, H., Hoang, T. T. H., & Hu, G. (2024). Developmental trajectories of second language learner classroom engagement: Do students’ task value beliefs and teacher emotional support matter? System, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103325
Wang, C., Mirzaei, T., Xu, T., & Lin, H. (2022). How learner engagement impacts non-formal online learning outcomes through value co-creation: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00341-x
Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2021). Student Engagement: Current State of the Construct, Conceptual Refinement, and Future Research Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 107-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3
Yuan, Y., & Dao, P. (2026). Young learners' online engagement: exploring learners' and teachers' perspectives. Language Awareness, 35(2), 432-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2025.2502427
Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2022). Types, features, and effectiveness of technologies in collaborative writing for second language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2391-2422. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1880441
Zhang, Z. (2022). Learner engagement and language learning: a narrative inquiry of a successful language learner. The Language Learning Journal, 50(3), 378-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786712
Zhou, S. A., Hiver, P., & Zheng, Y. (2023). Modeling Intra- And Inter-Individual Changes in L2 Classroom Engagement. Applied Linguistics, 44(6), 1047-1076. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac065
Zhu, R., & Mokhtar, M. M. (2026). Understanding oral corrective feedback in Chinese university EFL classrooms: a qualitative study of cognitive, affective, and relational processes. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 11(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-026-00442-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Tran Viet Hong, Nguyen Hong Ha My, Nguyen Thi Nhu Nhien

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



