The role of evaluative nouns in shaping modern English movie discourse: An axiological and morphological analysis

Irena  Snikhovska; Larysa  Soloviova; Julia  Bereziuk; Svitlana  Poplavska; Zoia  Zalibovska-Ilnitska

doi:10.12928/eltej.v9i1.15939

Authors

Irena Snikhovska Department of Natural and Social-Humanitarian Disciplines, Zhytomyr Medical Institute of Zhytomyr Regional Council
Larysa Soloviova Foreign Languages Department, Polissia National University
Julia Bereziuk Department of Natural and Social-Humanitarian Disciplines, Zhytomyr Medical Institute of Zhytomyr Regional Council
Svitlana Poplavska Department of Natural and Social-Humanitarian Disciplines, Zhytomyr Medical Institute of Zhytomyr Regional Council
Zoia Zalibovska-Ilnitska Department of Social Technologies, Faculty of Social Psychology, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v9i1.15939

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, EFL, Google Gemini, Lexical appropriateness, Paragraph writing

Abstract

Evaluative language has been widely examined, but evaluative nouns in cinematic discourse remain insufficiently studied. This study addresses this gap by systematically analyzing evaluative nouns in English movie dialogue. A sample of 176 lexemes with explicit evaluative marking was selected from authoritative dictionaries and analyzed using The Movie Corpus with a frequency threshold of ≥10 occurrences. The study combines lexicographic analysis with corpus-based methods to identify recurrent patterns and contextual usage. The findings reveal a strong quantitative asymmetry between negative and positive evaluative nouns (84 vs. 8), indicating a linguistic tendency to mark deviations in cinematic language. Morphologically, evaluative meanings are primarily realized through suffixation, with -y/-ie, -ling, -er, and -o demonstrating high productivity in the dataset. These suffixes exhibit functional ambivalence, encoding both pejorative and meliorative meanings depending on context. The results show that evaluative nouns function as recurrent elements in cinematic dialogue, contributing to character construction and interactional dynamics. This study contributes to evaluative morphology and discourse analysis by integrating lexicographic and corpus-based approaches. The findings may inform research in film studies, translation, and applied linguistics.

References

American Heritage Dictionaries (AHD). (2015). American heritage dictionary of the English language. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. https://archive.org/details/americanheritage0000unse_s7t0

Astri, Z., Noni, N., Halim, A., & Noer, F. (2024). A comprehensive guide to corpus linguistics: A book review of corpora in applied linguistics. Research and Innovation in Applied Linguistics [RIAL], 2(2), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.31963/rial.v2i2.4861

Barradas, G. T., & Sakka, L. S. (2022). When words matter: A cross-cultural perspective on lyrics and their relationship to musical emotions. Psychology of Music, 50(2), 650-669. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356211013390

Bednarek, M. (2018). Language and television series: A linguistic approach to TV dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108559553

Capps, J. (2024). Epistemology, logic, and inquiry. In The Bloomsbury handbook of pragmatism (p.101). Bloomsbury Publishing. http://digital.casalini.it/9781350324015

Chang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, K., ... & Xie, X. (2024). A survey on evaluation of large language models. ACM transactions on intelligent systems and technology, 15(3), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3641289

Collins, H. (2014). Collins English dictionary (12th edition). Harper Collins. https://archive.org/details/collinsenglishdi0000unse_o5u1

Csomay, E., & Crawford, W. J. (2024). Doing corpus linguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003363309

Desagulier, G., Desagulier, G., & Amboy. (2017). Corpus linguistics and statistics with R. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64572-8

Fuoli, M., Littlemore, J., & Turner, S. (2022). Sunken ships and screaming banshees: Metaphor and evaluation in film reviews. English Language & Linguistics, 26(1), 75-103. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674321000046

Gao, C., Lan, X., Li, N., Yuan, Y., Ding, J., Zhou, Z., ... & Li, Y. (2024). Large language models empowered agent-based modeling and simulation: A survey and perspectives. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03611-3

Grandi, N. (Ed.). (2015). Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology. Edinburgh University Press. https://lnk.ua/jgbgQcNKV

Green, J. (2010). Dictionary of slang and unconventional English (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.460523

Gries, S. T. (2023). New technologies and advances in statistical analysis in recent decades. The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119839859.ch31

Ha, M. (2024). Semantic and grammatical analysis of synonymous adjectives in British English. The New Korean Association of English Language and Literature, 66(3), 143–170. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE11920949

Jenset, G. B., & McGillivray, B. (2017). Quantitative Historical Linguistics (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198718178.001.0001

Kosmeda, T. (2024). Negatively marked lexico-semantic borrowings from the Russian language appeared during the period of the Russian-Ukrainian war. Linguistic Bulletin, (35). https://doi.org/10.31651/2226-4388-2023-35-18-27

Kosmeda, T., Kovtun, O., & Slipetska, V. (2024). Morphology of evaluation: the peculiarities of modeling evaluative meanings through morphological means in the Ukrainian language. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 13(81), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.81.09.9

Kovalchuk, O. (2025). Logical paradoxes in law application: formal rationality vs principles of justice. Aktual’ni Problemi Pravoznavstva, (2), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.35774/app2025.02.222

Larsson, T., Egbert, J., & Biber, D. (2022). On the status of statistical reporting versus linguistic description in corpus linguistics: A ten-year perspective. Corpora, 17(1), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2022.0238

Li, Y. (2021). The use of appraisal approach for critical discourse analysis of Nezha movie reviews found in IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes websites. Language in India, 21(7), 221–244. https://languageinindia.com/july2021/yuelimoviewreviews.pdf

Liefke, K. (2024). Experiential Attitudes are Propositional. Erkenntnis, 89(1), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00534-w

Liu, S., Su, C., Zhang, J., Takeda, S., Liu, J., & Yang, R. (2023). Cross-cultural comparison of urban green space through crowdsourced big data: A natural language processing and image recognition approach. Land, 12(4), 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040767

Lomas, T. (2023). The value of ambivalent emotions: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1400143

Malyuga, E. N. (2024). The language of corporate communication. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58905-8

Martín Calvo, R. (2022). A descriptive framework for evaluative morphology resources. Language: Meaning & Form/Valoda: Nozīme un Forma, (13). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10110270

McManus, K. (2024). Replication studies in second language acquisition research: Definitions, issues, resources, and future directions: Introduction to the special issue. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46(5), 1299-1319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263124000652

Mustafayeva, M. (2025). Terminology as a research source in modern linguistics. American Journal of Education and Learning, 3(2), 239–247. https://zenodo.org/records/14835773

Norov, I. (2024). A systematic study of the vocabulary of the language. Fan va Tadqiqot Samaralari, 1(1), 23–26. https://academicsbook.com/index.php/fts/article/view/14

Odrekhivska, I. (2021). Historiosophy of translation. The Situatedness of Translation Studies: Temporal and Geographical Dynamics of Theorization, 48, 34.

Omar, F. R., & Razı, Ö. (2022). Impact of instruction based on movie and TV series clips on EFL learners’ pragmatic competence: Speech acts in focus. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 974757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974757

Palmer, S. E. (2024). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In Cognition and Categorization (pp. 259–303). Routledge. https://surl.li/ecdrld

Parviz, M., Jalilifar, A., & Don, A. (2024). Unpacking evaluative meaning-making resources in verbal movie descriptions: A comparative study of native and non-native English speakers. SAGE Open, 14(4), 21582440241284374. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241284374

Pescuma, V. N., Serova, D., Lukassek, J., Sauermann, A., Schäfer, R., Adli, A., ... & Knoeferle, P. (2023). Situating language register across the ages, languages, modalities, and cultural aspects: Evidence from complementary methods. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 964658. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964658

Polli, C. (2025). Addiction and additions: Translating drug culture in Italy. In Translating US Underground Comix in Italy: A Semiotic Perspective on Satire and Subversion (pp. 191-238). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72886-0_6

Prihodko, G., & Prykhodchenko, O. (2020). Cognitive-pragmatic aspect of the category of evaluation. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 30(1–1), 93–101.

Puhach, Y. M. (2024). The verbalization of emotions in English phraseological units. Scientific Journal of Mykhailo Dragomanov State University of Ukraine. Series 9. Current Trends in Language Development, (27), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.31392/NPU-nc.series9.2024.27.04

Saint-Joanis, O. (2024). A new set of linguistic resources for Ukrainian. In Linguistic Resources for Natural Language Processing: On the Necessity of Using Linguistic Methods to Develop NLP Software (pp. 87-108). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43811-0_5

Sarfati, G.-E. (2024). Subjectivité, positionnement, énonciation. Cahiers de Praxématique, (81). https://doi.org/10.4000/praxematique.9190

Shuxratovna, D. S. (2025). Exploring the axiological lexicon in contrastive linguistics: Cross-language perspectives on evaluative meaning. Modern American Journal of Linguistics, Education, and Pedagogy, 1(2), 124–129. https://usajournals.org/index.php/6/article/view/88

Slipetska, V., Bortun, K., Zhylin, M., Horlachova, V., & Kosharnyi, K. (2023). Structure and semantics of verbal means of expressing states of emotional tension in english publicistic texts. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 12(67), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.67.07.19

Solovyova, L., & Snikhovska, I. (2024). English evaluation vocabulary in drama texts. Herald of Science and Education. Series: Philology, (2(20)). https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6165-2024-2(20)-353-365

Stará, V. (2021). The Language of the Film criticism (Doctoral dissertation, Masaryk University, Faculty of Education).

The Movie Corpus. (2024). Main page. https://www.english-corpora.org/movies

Thompson, G., & Alba-Juez, L. (Eds.) (2014). Evaluation in Context. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242

Tianying, L., & Bogoyavlenskaya, Y. V. (2023). Semantic transformation and cultural adaptation of metaphor and multimodal metaphor in multilingual communication from the perspective of cognitive linguistics. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 161-189. https://ejal.info/article-view/?id=465

Wang, Y. (2023). Research on emotion classification technology of movie reviews based on topic attention mechanism and dual channel long short-term memory. PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1295. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1295

Webster, M. (2022). The Merriam-Webster dictionary. Merriam Webster, Inc.

Woodford, K. (2003). Cambridge advanced learner’s dictionary. Cambridge University Press.

Zahnitko, A. (2020). Modern linguistic dictionary. TVORY Publishers. https://eprints.oa.edu.ua/id/eprint/10124/1/NZ_FIlologiia_Vyp_25%2893%29.pdf