Rhetorical structure and metadiscourse markers of local and international agriculture research abstracts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v9i1.15715Keywords:
Agriculture, Genre Analysis, Metadiscourse Markers, Research Abstracts, Rhetorical StructureAbstract
Educational mandates promoting a research culture among educators and students emphasize the importance of high-quality research publications. A critical component of this is writing effective research abstracts, a key requirement for journal acceptance. This comparative genre-based study aimed to analyze the macrostructure and linguistic features of 40 local agricultural research abstracts from a state university journal and 40 international abstracts from reputable journals covering 2011-2024. Using Hyland’s (2000, 2004, 2005) frameworks, the rhetorical structures, metadiscourse patterns, and communicative functions of the corpora were analyzed. Both local and international abstracts commonly employed moves like Purpose, Method, and Product. Local abstracts considered the Introduction and Conclusion moves as optional, while these moves were conventional in international abstracts. Typical patterns for local abstracts were PMPrC and PMPr, while most international abstracts followed Hyland's IPMPrC framework. Both sets used metadiscourse markers, but international abstracts employed them more frequently, favoring boosters over hedges to emphasize certainty and validation. These findings highlight the importance of adhering to international academic writing norms to enhance research visibility and impact, with implications for teaching academic writing and research.
References
Adais, F. D., & Panolong, K. S. (2022). Language theses and dissertation landscapes: An analysis of research analyses. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v2i4.48
Albakkosh, I. (2024). Using Fleiss’ Kappa coefficient to measure the intra- and inter-rater reliability of three AI software programs in the assessment of EFL learners’ story writing. International Journal of Educational Sciences and Arts, 3(1). 69-96. https://doi.org/10.59992/IJESA.2023.v3n1p4
Amnuai, W. (2019). Analyses of rhetorical moves and linguistic realizations in accounting research article abstracts published in international and Thai-based journals. SAGE Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822384
Andika, R. P., Arsyad, S., & Harahap, A. (2018). Rhetorical moves and linguistic features of journal article abstracts by postgraduate students, national and international authors in applied linguistics. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 3(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v3i1.6539
Arsyad, S., Pratiwi, V. A., An-Nashir, A. A., Erviona, L., & Marjelina, O. (2023). The rhetorical structure and research gap strategies of journal article abstracts in language-related fields published in high-impact international journals. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1), 703-725.
Ashofteh, Z., Elahi Shirvan, M., & Golparvar, S. E. (2020). The move structure of abstracts in applied linguistics research articles in light of the distribution and functions of metadiscourse markers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 2077-2096. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.851035
Bal-Gezegin, B., & Baş, M. (2020). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A comparison of research articles and book reviews. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.710204
Çapar, M., & Turan, Ü. D. (2020). Interactional metadiscourse in research articles written by Turkish and native speaker. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 10(1), 324–358. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.682042
Commission on Higher Education. (2019). CMO No. 15, series of 2019: Policies, standards and guidelines for graduate programs. https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/CMO-No.-15-Series-of-2019
Darabad, A. M. (2016). Move analysis of research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2). 125-140. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9379
Department of Budget and Management, & Department of Education. (2022). Guidelines on the reclassification of faculty positions in state universities and colleges (SUCs) (Joint Memorandum Circular No. 03, s. 2022, October 18, 2022). https://www.dbm.gov.ph/wp- content/uploads/Issuances/2022/Joint-Circular/DBM-JC-No-3-s-2022-9th-cycle-NBC-461
Ekoç-Özçelik,A. (2023). Hedges and boosters in research article abstracts of Turkish and Chinese scholars. Journal of Language Education and Research, 9(1), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.31464/jlere.1057023
El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2018). Comparative genre analysis of research article abstracts in more and less prestigious journals: Linguistics journals in focus. Research in Language, 16(1). 47-63 https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2018-0002
Gheinani, M. T., & Tabatabaei, O. (2018). A structural move analysis of the abstract section of ISI articles of Iranian and native scholars in the field of agricultural engineering. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 7(3), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2017.1864
Hasan, E., & Alsout E. (2023). A pragmatic approach to the rhetorical analysis and the metadiscourse markers of research article abstracts in the field of applied linguistics. Discourse and Interaction. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2023-2-5
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing.
Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse studies, 7(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Kaya, F., & Yağız, O. (2020). Move analysis of research article abstracts in the field of ELT: A comparative study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(1), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls
Kirişçi, D. I., & Duruk, E. (2022). A comparative study of metadiscourse markers in the abstract sections of research articles written by Turkish and English researchers. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.34293
Magday, W., Razalan, M., Uhuad, K., Concepcion, R., Pacursa, L., & Bartolome, F. (2022). Comparative genre analysis of research abstracts: Philippine versus international colloquia. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1206.05
Ngai, S. B. C., Singh, R. G., & Koon, A. C. (2018). A discourse analysis of the macro-structure, metadiscoursal and microdiscoursal features in the abstracts of research articles across multiple science disciplines. PLOS ONE, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205417
Ondondo, E. A. (2020). Interactional metadiscourse in doctoral thesis writing: A study in Kenya. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 4(4), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2020.92053
Quinto, J. (2019). CMO No. 15, s. 2019: Graduate students, are you ready for this? Journal of International Education, 4, 54-62.
Ramadhini, T. M., Wahyuni, I. T., Ramadhani, N. T., Kurniawan, E., Gunawan, W., & Muniroh, R. D. D. A. (2021, April). The rhetorical moves of abstracts written by the authors in the field of hard sciences. In Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020) (pp. 587-592). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.089
Roxas, M. J. (2020). Move Analysis of Senior High School Research Abstracts in a Philippine University. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 1(2), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v1i2.26
Ruonan, L., & Al-Shaibani, G. (2022). An investigation into the use of metadiscourse in undergraduates’ abstracts in social sciences. Topics in Linguistics, 23(2), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2022-0010
Saidi, M., & Talebi, S. (2021). Genre analysis of research article abstracts in English for academic purposes journals: Exploring the possible variations across the venues of research. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3578179
Şanverdi, M. (2021). Boosters as interactional metadiscourse markers: A corpus-driven comparative study, Pearson Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 6(15), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.46872/pj.368
Sriwanat, S., & Phoocharoensil, S. (2024). A comparison of rhetorical move structure of research article abstracts of Thai Scopus journals and top ranked scopus journals in applied linguistics and English language teaching. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 12(3), 11- 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v12i3.7464
Suntara, W. (2017). Linguistic features in academic abstracts published in agriculture research articles: A corpus-based approach. Vacana Journal, 5(1), 18-37
Suntara, W. (2018). Linguistic realisations of rhetorical structure in research article abstracts: An analysis based on food technology journals. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 26(3). 1283-1300.
Tamela, E. (2020, May). Move structure analysis on research article abstracts in national and international SCOPUS indexed journals. In International Conference on English Language Teaching (ICONELT 2019) (pp. 12-17). Atlantis Press.
https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200427.004
Vázquez, I., & Giner, D. (2008). Beyond mood and modality: Epistemic modality markers as hedges in research articles. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, (21), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2008.21.10
Vázquez, I., & Giner, D. (2009). Writing with conviction: The use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, (22). 219-237. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2009.22.14
Viera, R. T. (2019). Rhetorical move structure in abstracts of research articles published in Ecuadorian and American English-speaking contexts. Arab World English Journal, 10(4), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frelita Bartolome, Dr. William D. Magday, Jr., Dr. William D. Magday, Jr.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
