Lexical-semantic group in contrastive analysis based on the material of Ukrainian, English, and German languages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v8i3.15296Keywords:
Cognitive semantics, Colors, Cross-cultural comparison, Kinship , Semantic fieldsAbstract
Cross-linguistic research on lexical-semantic groups (LSGs) often remains predominantly qualitative and fragmented, which makes it difficult to compare universal and culture-specific patterns across languages in a systematic way. This study examines four LSGs emotions, colours, verbs of motion, and kinship terms in Ukrainian, English, and German in order to clarify how their core and periphery are structured in contemporary language use. Conceptually, the study is situated within cognitive semantics and prototype theory, treating core–periphery structure as a frequency-based approximation of shared prototypes and peripheral extensions. The empirical basis consists of a questionnaire survey of 300 respondents (100 per language group), combining frequency ratings with choices among near-synonymous items. Quantitative analysis (core ≥ 75% of respondents) is complemented by qualitative interpretation of polysemy and cultural associations. The results show that in the emotional domain Ukrainians most frequently actualize радість ‘joy’, whereas English and German speakers foreground negative emotions such as anger/Ärger and fear/Angst. In the colour group, a shared core is formed by red, blue, and green, with minor differences in the salience of yellow. For verbs of motion, йти/go/gehen constitutes a universal core, while English and German display higher frequencies of transport-related verbs (ride/fahren). Kinship terms (mother, father, brother, sister) form the most stable core across all three languages. Overall, the study demonstrates how LSGs simultaneously reflect universal cognitive categories and culturally conditioned profiles of salience and contributes to cognitive and contrastive semantics by offering an empirically grounded, frequency-based core–periphery model with applications for contrastive semantics, translation, and intercultural language pedagogy.
References
Absattar, A., Mambetova, M., & Zhubay, O. (2022). The potential of emotive language to influence the understanding of textual information in media coverage. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(222). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01232-2
Bąk, H. & Altarriba, J. (2023). Basic emotion prototypes in English and Polish. Cognitive Semantics, 9(2), 254–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10053
Barseghyan, G. (2020). Semantic groups of vocabulary in sports reports. Armenian Folia Anglistika, 16(2), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.46991/AFA/2020.16.2.047
Basile, G. (2022). Synonymy and contextual dependence. In Exploring contextualism and performativity (pp. 41–54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12543-0_3
Beekhuizen, B., & Stevenson, S. (2018). More than the eye can see: A computational model of color term acquisition and color discrimination. Cognitive Science, 42(8), 2699–2734. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12665
Beekhuizen, B., Armstrong, B. C., & Stevenson, S. (2021). Probing lexical ambiguity: Word vectors encode number and relatedness of senses. Cognitive Science, 45(5), e12943. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12943
Carling, G., & Cronhamn, S. (2023). The evolution of lexical semantics dynamics, directionality, and drift. Frontiers in Communication, 8, 1126249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1126249
Cienki, A. (2023). Speakers’ gestures and semantic analysis. Cognitive Semantics, 9(2), 167–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10051
Diachuk, N. (2024). Contextual and lexical synonymy: Theoretical background. Scientific Notes of NaUOA. Series "Philology", 23(91), 23–26. http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/42241/1/1.pdf
Díaz, J.-L. et al. (2022). Emotion words in Spanish… Cognitive Semantics, 8(2), 181–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/23526416-08020002
Dilay, I. P. & Dilay, M. P. (2021). Cognitive corps linguistics: Contemporary issue and perspectives. Nova fìlologìâ, 83, 71-78.
Falck, M., & Okonski, L. (2022). Procedure for identifying metaphorical scenes (PIMS): A cognitive linguistics approach to bridge theory and practice. Cognitive Semantics, 8(2), 294–322. https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10031
Gaskins, D., & Rundblad, G. (2023). Metaphor production in the bilingual acquisition of English and Polish. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1162486. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1162486
Guo, R., Wang, G., Wu, D., & Wu, Z. (2025). Keep bright in the dark: Multimodal emotional effects on donation-based crowdfunding performance and their empathic mechanisms. British Journal of Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12774
Habibi, A. A., Kemp, C., & Xu, Y. (2020). Chaining and the growth of linguistic categories. Cognition, 202, 104323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104323
Hollis, G., & Westbury, C. (2016). The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(6), 1744–1756. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1053-2
Hollis, G., Westbury, C., & Lefsrud, L. (2017). Extrapolating human judgments from skip-gram vector representations of word meaning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(8), 1603–1619. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1195417
Iordan, M. C., Giallanza, T., Ellis, C. T., Beckage, N. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2022). Context matters: Recovering human semantic structure from machine learning analysis of large-scale text corpora. Cognitive Science, 46(6), e13085. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13085
Jackson, J. C., Watts, J., Henry, T. R., List, J.-M., Forkel, R., Mucha, P. J., Greenhill, S. J., Gray, R. D., & Lindquist, K. A. (2020). Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure. Science, 366(6460), 1517–1522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw8160
Kanwal, T., Haroon, H., Khan, U. A., & Arif, M. (2025). Linguistic diversity in kinship terminology: A study of cultural evolution across regions. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 14(2), 269–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.62345/jads.2025.14.2.23
Karidi, T., Grossman, E., & Abend, O. (2024). Locally measuring cross-lingual lexical alignment: A domain and word level perspective. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 (pp. 15877–15893). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.932
Kawai, C., Lukács, G., & Ansorge, U. (2020). Polarities influence implicit associations between colour and emotion. Acta Psychologica, 209, 103143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103143
Kawai, C., Zhang, Y., Lukács, G., Chu, W., Zheng, C., Gao, C., Gozli, D., Wang, Y., & Ansorge, U. (2023). The good, the bad, and the red: Implicit color-valence associations across cultures. Psychological Research, 87, 704–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01697-5
Kazymir, I. (2023). Contextual-synonymous nominations in media texts of politics and medicine. Contemporary Studies in Foreign Philology, 2(24), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.32782/2617-3921.2023.24.87-94
Kazymir, I. (2024). Contextual-synonymous nominations of the referent in media texts of sports. Scientific works of MAUP. Philology, 2(12), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.32689/maup.philol.2024.2.7
Kemp, L., & McDonald, J. L. (2021). Second language vocabulary acquisition: The effects of semantic relatedness, form similarity, and translation direction. Language Learning, 71(3), 716–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12449
Khalilia, H., Bella, G., Freihat, A. Alhakim, Darma, S., & Giunchiglia, F. (2023). Lexical diversity in kinship across languages and dialects. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 812555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1229697
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. University of Chicago Press.
Majid, A., & Van Staden, M. (2015). Can nomenclature for the body be explained by embodiment theories? Topics in Cognitive Science, 7(4), 570–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12159
Maslova, Y. (2023). Representation of zoomorphic metaphor in modern Ukrainian wartime newspaper discourse. Movoznavstvo. Literaturoznavstvo, 60(3).https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/60-3-16
Melnychuk, O. D. (2021). Cognitive semantics in the perspective of conceptual structure and linguistic meaning. In Philological Sciences and Translation Studies: European Potential (pp. 160–164). Baltija Publishing. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-110-7-36
Milutina, K., Balashevych, O., & Zarubin, I. (2024). How Ukrainians perceive emotions and colours: An analysis of specific features. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología – Serie de Conferencias, 3, 1224. http://dx.doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024.1224
Mizin, I., Kuzyk, M., & Rudak, O. (2021). The emotion concept of shame as one of markers of social infantilism: Cross-cultural analysis based on corpora. Amazonia Investiga, 10(48), 863–869. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.48.12.11
Morras Cortés, J. A., & Barcelona, A. (2023). Emojis: Metonymy in meaning and use. Cognitive Semantics, 9(2), 281–314. https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10049
Naamati-Schneider, L., & Gabay, G. (2022). Metaphors of war in effective and ineffective coping of medical directors of COVID-19 wards. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.830266
Park, H. I. (2022). The role of language in expressing agentivity in caused motion events: A cross-linguistic investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 878277. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.878277
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192
Shevchenko, I., & Shastalo, V. (2021). The conceptual metaphor of modesty in English and Ukrainian. Cognitive Studies / Études Cognitives, 21. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2462
Shevchenko, O. M., & Shevchenko, N. S. (2020). Cognitive linguistics as a direction of linguistic research. Young Scientist, 7(83), 142–146. https://doi.org//10.32839/2304-5809/2020-83.1-36
Stevenson, S., Merlo, P. (2022). Beyond the benchmarks: Toward human-like lexical representations. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 796741. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.796741
Stocker, K. (2023). Cognitive-semantic concept structuring in visual perception and visual imagery. Cognitive Semantics, 9(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-BJA10038
Syrett, K. (2024). Variation by context: The importance of pragmatics and the discourse. Language Learning and Development, 59–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2023.2239783
Tilavova, M. M. (2023). The nature of synonymy as a basic unit of language vocabulary. International Journal of Education, Social Science & Humanities, 11(5), 2447. https://www.academia.edu/112403522
Toan, L. N. (2025). Contrastive semantics in cross-linguistic analysis: A comprehensive review and synthesis of five crucial models. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 7(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.31849/dew37f39
Topchyi, O. (2020). Colour additive units with secondary semantics in the Ukrainian and English languages. ACROSS – Journal of Interdisciplinary Cross-Border Studies, 3(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.35219/across.2020.3.1.12
Trier, J. (1931). Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
Valente, M. B. (2022). Do all languages share the same conceptual structure? Cognitive Semantics, 8(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-08020001
Xu, M., Zhu, J., & Benítez-Burraco, A. (2023). A comparison of basic color terms in Mandarin and Spanish. Color Research & Application, 48(6), 709–720.
Xu, Y., Duong, K., Malt, B. C., Jiang, S., & Srinivasan, M. (2020). Conceptual relations predict colexification across languages. Cognition, 201, 104280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104280
Youn, H., Sutton, L., Bhattacharya Т. (2015). On the universal structure of human lexical semantics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(7), 1766–1771. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520752113
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anastasiia Kinashchuk, Viktoriia Pryma, Sofiia Kozak, Liudmyla Prybluda, Yuriy Sobkov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
