Informality features in Thai EFL academic writing: Corpus evidence and instructor perceptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v8i3.14455Keywords:
Academic writing; Essay writing; Informality; EFL writing, Instructors’ perceptionsAbstract
In recent years, a slight increase in the use of informal elements has been observed in academic writing, indicating a shift toward a more interactive connection between authors and readers in scholarly communication. Although more flexibility is found in academic texts, EFL students’ ability to develop academic writing styles has not been fullyexplored in the Thai context. This research investigated the distribution of 10 informal features established by Hyland and Jiang (2017) in Thai EFL students’ academic essays and examined EFL writing instructors' perceptions of such features. The data were collected from a corpus of 147 academic essays (63,029 words) written by Thai undergraduate English majors. The survey responses were obtained from 31 EFL writing instructors regarding their perceptions of informal features collected through online questionnaire responses. The results revealed that the most frequently occurring informal features were second-person pronouns, first-person pronouns, and sentence-initial conjunctions, respectively. While the writing instructors perceived split infinitives, unattended anaphoric pronouns, and sentence-final prepositions as highly acceptable informal features, they were unlikely to approve of contractions, sentence-initial conjunctions, and exclamations in students’ academic assignments. The study combines corpus-based evidence with instructor perspectives to reveal a mismatch between students’ linguistic practices and academic writing expectations in the Thai context. It further suggests that explicit instruction in academic writing conventions should be more fully integrated into the writing curriculum to strengthen EFL students’ understanding and development of academic discourse proficiency.
References
Abegglen, S., Burns, T., & Sinfield, S. (2022). What makes writing academic: Rethinkingtheory for practice. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 32, 358-365.https://doi.org/10.31468/dwr.971Alipour, M., & Nooreddinmoosa, M. (2018). Informality in applied linguistics research articles: Comparing native and non-native writings. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 349-373. https://doi:10.32601/ejal.464196Angelica, A., Sumarni, S., & Rezeki, Y. S. (2025). Formal and informal language features in the academic writing of fourth-semester EFL students. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(5), 533-547. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i5.1360Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc(Version 3. 4. 4). [Computer Software]. Waseda University.http://www.laurenceanthony.net
English Language Teaching Educational JournalISSN 2621-6485Vol.8, No. 3, December2025, pp. 286-300Suwannasom(Informality features in Thai EFL academic writing: Corpus evidence and.....)Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230290518Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. John Benjamins.https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G. (2002). Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson.Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Bosuwon, T. (2014). EFL teachers’ awareness and tolerance of Thai undergraduates’ syntactic writing errors. University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce Journal Humanities andSocial Sciences,34(3),83–103.https://so06.tcithaijo.org/index.php/utccjournalhs/article/view/189861Briones, S. H., Abundo, L. V., Quiñones, P. S., Regilme, K. M. D., Catalan Jr, J. C., Cañeza, D. C. B., & Ocampo, D. M. (2024). Effects of colloquial language on the writing skills of Grade 11 students. Journal of English Education Forum, 4(2), 70-78.https://doi.org/10.29303/jeef.v4i2.672Chan, E. Y., & Meng, Y. (2023). They’re vs. they are: Contractions influence product choice and judgments. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113463 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113463Chang, C., & Wei. L. (2022). A self-investigation into Thai EFL writing instructors’perceptions toward written feedback on college students’ writing essay assignment. English Language Teaching, 15(8), 34–34. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n8p34Chang, Y. Y., & Swales, J. M. (1999). Informal elements in English academic writing:Threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers? In C. N. Candlin& K. Hyland (Eds.),Writing: Texts, processes and practices. Routledge. Chuang, P. L., & Yan, X. (2022). An investigation of the relationship between argument structure and essay quality in assessed writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 56, 100892.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100892Constantinou, F., Chambers, L., Zanini, N., & Klir, N. (2020). A diachronic perspective on formality in students’ writing: Empirical findings from the UK. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33(1), 66-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1563609Crespo, B. (2024). “... but be sure you let it settle”: Late modern authors’ presence inEnglish scientific texts. Atlantis: Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 46(1), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.28914/atlantis-2024-46.1.09Dixon, T. (2022). Proscribed informality features in published research: A corpus analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 65, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.09.003Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power(2nd ed.). Longman.Ferris, D. R. (2016). L2 writers in higher education. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing(pp. 141–160). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511335-009Fontenelle-Tereshchuk, D. (2024). Academic writing and ChatGPT: Students transitioning into college in the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic. Discover Education, 3(6).https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00076-5Gilquin, G., & Paquot, M. (2008). Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction, 1(1), 41-61.https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.1.1.05gilHinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers’ texts: Linguistic and rhetorical features. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602848
ISSN 2621-6485English Language Teaching Educational Journal299Vol.8, No. 3, December2025, pp. 286-300Suwannasom(Informality features in Thai EFL academic writing: Corpus evidence and.....)Hinkel, E. (2003). Simplicity without elegance: Features of sentences in L1 and L2 academic texts. TESOL Quarterly, 37. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588505Huang, Z., Chen, G., & Jiang, Z. (2025). Assessing L2 writing formality using syntactic complexity indices: A fuzzy evaluation approach. Assessing Writing, 66, 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2025.100973Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for specific purposes, 20(3), 207-226.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0Hyland, K. (2015). Corpora and written academic English. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics(pp. 292–308). Cambridge UniversityPress.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139764377.017Hyland, K. (2023). English for academic purposes and discourse analysis. In M. Handford, & J. P. Gee (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis(2nd ed.). Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035244-42Hyland, K., & Anan, E. (2006). Teachers’ perceptions of error: the effects of first language and experience. System, 34(4), 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.001Hyland, K., & Jiang, K. (2017). Is academic writing becoming more informal? English for Specific Purposes, 45, 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001Kongcharoen, P., Dhanarattigannon, J., & Bumrungsalee, I. (2025). Formality in the academic writing of Thai EFL English-major students. rEFLections, 32, 395-414. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v32i1.280228Kyei, E., Afreh, E. S., Akoto, O. Y., Jujugenia, W. A., & Soadwah, K. (2025). A corpus-based cross-disciplinary study of unattended anaphoric pronouns in L2 postgraduate theses. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 3(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.51826/jelpa.v3i1.1323Larsson, T., & Kaatari, H. (2019). Extraposition in learner and expert writing: Exploring (in) formality and the impact of register. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 5(1), 33-62. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.17014.larLarsson, T., Reppen, R., & Dixon, T. (2022). A phraseological study of highlighting strategies in novice and expert writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101179Lee, J. J., Tytko, T., & Larkin, R. (2021). (Un) attended this/these in undergraduate student writing: A corpus analysis of high-and low-rated L2 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50, 100967. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100967Lee, J., Bychkovska, T., & Maxwell, J. (2019). Breaking the rules? A corpus-based comparison of informal features in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing. System. 80. 143-153. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.11.010Leedham, M. (2015). Chinese students' writing in English: Implications from a corpus-driven study. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797488Liardét, C. L., Black, S., & Bardetta, V. S. (2019). Defining formality: Adapting to the abstract demands of academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.007Manchón, R. M., & Larios, J. R. D. (2007). Writing-to-learn in instructed language learning contexts. In E. A. Soler & M. S. Jordà (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning(pp. 101–121). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5639-0_6Matsuda, P. K., & Nouri, M. (2020). Informal writing and language learning. In M. Dressman, & R. Randall, The handbook of informal language learning(pp. 75-84). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119472384.ch5Mizusawa, Y. (2020). Lexicogrammatical and Semantic Development in Academic Writing of EFL
English Language Teaching Educational JournalISSN 2621-6485Vol.8, No. 3, December2025, pp. 286-300Suwannasom(Informality features in Thai EFL academic writing: Corpus evidence and.....)Learners: A Systemic Functional Approach. Modern Journal ofStudies in English Language Teaching and Literature, 2(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.56498/222020103Parveen, S., & Hafeez, M. R. (2024). Informal language in academic writing analysis of social sciences PhD dissertations in Pakistan. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 8(2), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2024(8-II)59Praminatih, G., Kwary, D., & Ardaniah, V. (2018). Is EFL students’ academic writing becoming more informal? Journal of World Languages, 5(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2019.1570664Saengboon, S., Panyaatisin, K., & Toomaneejinda, A. (2022). The roles of grammar in English language teaching: Local viewpoints. PASAA, 63, 179–204. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.63.1.7Sansom, R. (2018). The nature of “voice” in academic writing. Voice and Speech Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268263.2018.1480172Strauss, P. (2012). The English is not the same: Challenges in thesis writing for secondlanguage speakers of English. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(3), 283-293.https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.611871Sulaiman, S. (2022). Students’ ways of understanding academic writing. Journal of General Education and Humanities, 1(4), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v1i4.32Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills: A course for nonnative speakers of English. University of Michigan Press.https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173936Thayer, A., Evans, M. B., McBride, A. A., Queen, M., & Spyridakis, J. H. (2010). I, pronoun: A study of formality in online content. Journal of Technical Writing andCommunication, 40(4), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.2190/tw.40.4.eTocalo, A. W. I., Racman, S. P., Guiamelon, K. N., Alibai, G., & Mama, B. M. (2022). Is Filipino ESL academic writing becoming more informal? PASAA, 64, 99‒125. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.64.1.5Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826Xia, G. (2020). A comparable-corpus-based study of informal features in academic writing byEnglish and Chinese scholars across disciplines. Ibérica, 39, 119–140.https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.39.119Yang, Y., & Pan, F. (2023). Informal features in English academic writing: Mismatch between prescriptive advice and actual practice. Southern African Linguistics andApplied Language Studies, 41(2), 102-119. http://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2022.288579Yu, S. (2025). Is informal writing only for fun? Revisiting the learning potential ofinformal writing in Second Language (L2) contexts. European Journal of Education, 60(4). e70260. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70260
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Thitirat Suwannasom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
