Dialogic feedback in English Language Teaching (ELT): Modalities, outcomes, and research trends
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v8i1.14057Keywords:
dialogic feedback, English Language Teaching, feedback literacy, systematic literature review, technology-mediated feedbackAbstract
This systematic literature review examines dialogic feedback research in English Language Teaching (ELT) based on 23 empirical studies published between 2010 and 2025. Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the review applied a rigorous selection and screening process to ensure transparency and replicability. Six main modalities of dialogic feedback are identified: face-to-face dialogic feedback, written dialogic feedback, technology-mediated dialogic feedback, peer dialogic feedback, supervisory dialogic feedback, and teacher professional development dialogic feedback This typology reflects variations in feedback interaction modes, participants, and instructional settings, offering a more nuanced framework for understanding how dialogic feedback operates across formal and informal learning contexts. These modalities promote interactive, learner-centered feedback processes across varied learning environments. The analysis highlights four key educational outcomes: improvements in writing proficiency, enhanced feedback literacy, increased learner engagement and reflection, and the development of learner autonomy and self-regulation. These outcomes demonstrate a consistent pedagogical value of dialogic feedback in supporting active learning ecosystems. Research trends reveal three chronological phases: early conceptual exploration, empirical classroom application, and recent growth in digital feedback practices. Studies predominantly employ sociocultural theory, dialogic pedagogy, feedback literacy, and self-regulated learning frameworks. Methodologically, the field has advanced from qualitative designs to mixed method and quasi-experimental approaches, mostly within Asian EFL university writing contexts. Notable gaps include the lack of longitudinal studies, minimal focus on speaking skills, and underrepresentation of diverse geographical and educational contexts. Future research should address these gaps by expanding skill focus, geographical coverage, and methodological rigor to ensure more equitable and effective dialogic feedback practices in ELT.
References
Alqefari, A. N. (2022). Spicing up undergraduate collaborative writing course through feedback dialogues. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(9), 250–273.
Bastola, M. N., & Hu, G. (2021). “Commenting on your work is a waste of time only!”: An appraisal-based study of evaluative language in supervisory feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100962
Bouwer, R., van Braak, M., & van der Veen, C. (2024). Dialogic writing in the upper grades of primary school: How to support peer feedback conversations that promote meaningful revisions. Learning and Instruction, 93(July), 101965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101965
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2015). Teacher agency and dialogic feedback: Using classroom data for practitioner inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.05.006
Christensen, J. P. (2004). Treatment of error in second language student writing. In TESL Report (Vol. 37, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Chung, E., & Fisher, L. (2022). A dialogic approach to promoting professional development: Understanding change in Hong Kong language teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding vocabulary teaching and learning. System, 110, 102901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102901
Daryanto, T., Ding, X., Wilhelm, L. T., Stil, S., Knutsen, K. M. I., & Rho, E. H. (2025). Conversate: Supporting Reflective Learning in Interview Practice Through Interactive Simulation and Dialogic Feedback. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3701188
Deng, Y., & Sitthitikul, P. (2025). The effects of the guided dialogic peer feedback-based writing instruction on Chinese EFL students’ writing performance in an integrated blended learning environment. REFLections, 32(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v32i1.277804
Enita, S., & Sumardi, S. (2023). Dialogic feedback on graduate students’ thesis writing supervision: voices of Indonesian graduate students. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2614
Fernández-Toro, M., & Furnborough, C. (2018). Evaluating alignment of student and tutor perspectives on feedback on language learning assignments. Distance Education, 39(4), 548–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520043
Han, J., & Mimi Li. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT-supported teacher feedback in the EFL context. System, 126, 103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103502
Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Jwa, S. (2024). Written feedback dialogue : A Cyclical for student engagement with feedback. TESOL Quarterly, 59(2), 1024–1035. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3365
Kazemi, M., Saadat, M., Wilson, J., & Rahimi, M. (2025). A comparative study on monologic vs. dialogic technology-mediated feedback modalities: Students’ uptake and perspectives. JALT CALL Journal, 21(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v21n1.1758
Lee, J. (2018). Feedback on feedback: Guiding student interpreter performance. Translation and Interpreting, 10(1), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.110201.2018.a09
Liu, W., & Lu, L. (2025). Improving student feedback literacy through collaborative dialogic feedback intervention: An action research study at a University in Southwest China. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 5(3), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2025.5828
Louw, S., Todd, R. W., & Jimarkon, P. (2014). Teacher trainers’ beliefs about feedback on teaching practice: Negotiating the tensions between authoritativeness and dialogic space. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu062
Maneepakhathorn, R. (2023). An exploratory study of reflective dialogue journal writing of EFL graduate students in the English as a foreign language context. REFLections, 30(1), 38–58.
Mateo, S. (2020). A procedure for conduction of a successful literature review using the PRISMA method. Kinesither Rev, 20(226), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kine.2020.05.019
Merkel, W. (2018). Role reversals: A case study of dialogic interactions and feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.11.007
Nehring, J., Laboy, W. T., & Catarius, L. (2010). Connecting reflective practice, dialogic protocols, and professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 36(3), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415250903102432
Saeed, M. A., & Al Qunayeer, H. S. (2022). Exploring teacher interactive e-feedback on students’ writing through Google Docs: factors promoting interactivity and potential for learning. Language Learning Journal, 50(3), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786711
Skidmore, D., & Murakami, K. (2016). Dialogic pedagogy: The importance of dialogue in teaching and learning. In Dialogic Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096220
Steen-Utheim, A., & Wittek, A. L. (2017). Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 15, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002
Tam, A. C. F. (2020). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of and responses to exemplar-based dialogic feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1772957
Turner, E. (2023a). Dialogic feedback and literary disciplinary knowledge in L2 writing instruction: how attitude to feedback influences academic achievement. Research Papers in Education, 38(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1941216
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (eds.)). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJY14M06_06
Washbourne, K. (2014). Beyond error marking: Written corrective feedback for a dialogic pedagogy in translator training. Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 8(2), 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2014.908554
Wu, X. M., Dixon, H. R., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Sustainable development of students’ learning capabilities: The case of university students’ attitudes towards teachers, peers, and themselves as oral feedback sources in learning english. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095211
Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
Zhou, S., Tso, W. S., & Aubrey, S. (2025). Enhancing L2 learners ’ self-regulated speaking through digital oral dialogue journaling: An EFL classroom-based study. RELC Journal, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882251313704
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ani Susanti, Tengku Intan Suzila Tengku Sharif, Alex Masardo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
