Enhancing reading comprehension and motivation through Think-Pair-Share: Classroom action research in an Indonesian EFL context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v8i1.13992Keywords:
Think–Pair–Share, Reading comprehension , Student motivation , Cooperative learning , EFL secondary classroomAbstract
Improving students' reading comprehension remains a persistent challenge in EFL classrooms, particularly where learners exhibit low motivation and limited engagement. This study investigated the effectiveness of the Think–Pair–Share (TPS) cooperative learning strategy in an Indonesian secondary EFL classroom. Using a Classroom Action Research (CAR) design, the intervention was conducted in two cycles, each consisting of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting stages. Data were collected through a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative evidence came from pre-tests and post-tests of reading comprehension, while qualitative data were obtained from classroom observations, field notes, and interviews. The findings showed substantial improvements in both motivation and understanding. Students' mean reading scores increased from 57.22 in the pre-test to 78.26 in Cycle II, with the number achieving the passing grade rising from three to fifteen. Variability decreased, indicating more consistent achievement across the class. Qualitative results revealed a transformation from passive and disengaged learners to confident and motivated participants who valued collaboration and peer support. The study concludes that TPS is effective not only in enhancing comprehension but also in fostering a student-centered and inclusive learning environment. Teachers are encouraged to integrate TPS with explicit scaffolding and adaptive sharing formats to maximize equity and engagement in reading instruction.
References
Alsmadi, M. A., Tabieh, A. A. S., Alsaifi, R. M., & Al-Nawaiseh, S. J. (2023). The effect of the collaborative discussion strategy think-pair-share on developing students' skills in solving engineering mathematical problems. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-12-(volume-12-issue-2-april-2023), 1123–1135. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.1123
Bećirović, S. (2023). The relationship between cooperative learning, cultural intelligence, EFL motivation, and students' performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Sage Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231208975
Burns, A. (2019a). Action research in English language teaching: Contributions and recent developments (pp. 1–15). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_52-1
Burns, A. (2019b). Action research: Developments, characteristics, and future directions. in the Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 166–185). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333603.008
Burns, A. (2024). Exploring the teaching of speaking through action research: Teachers’ voices (pp. 53–72). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59321-5_4
Cooper, K. M., Schinske, J. N., & Tanner, K. D. (2021). Reconsidering the share of a think–pair–share: Emerging limitations, alternatives, and opportunities for research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(1), fe1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-08-0200
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England.
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, Timothy C. (2025). educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 7th edition. Pearson.
Deore, M., & Arora, S. (2022). Effective think-pair-share pedagogical strategy to improve inferential statistics concept understanding. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(Special Issue 1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v36is1/22170
Dikilitaş, K. (2024). Student engagement through action research. In The Routledge Handbook of language teacher action research (pp. 96–107). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003367352-11
Early, K. S., Williams, J., & Saltarelli, W. A. (2025). Applying the jigsaw learning method to structural kinesiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 49(2), 593–598. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00004.2025
Gozali, I., Lie, A., Tamah, S. M., Triwidayati, K. R., Utami, T. S. D., & Jemadi, F. (2021). Secondary School Language Teachers' Online Learning Engagement during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. In COVID-19 and Education: Learning and Teaching in a Pandemic-Constrained Environment. (pp. 363–392). Informing Science Press.
Khan, H. F., Qayyum, S., Beenish, H., Khan, R. A., Iltaf, S., & Faysal, L. R. (2025). Determining the alignment of assessment items with curriculum goals through document analysis by addressing identified item flaws. BMC Medical Education, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06736-4
Khataybeh, A., Al-Shadiedh, M., & Khasawneh, G. (2024). The effectiveness of cooperative learning strategy for mastery in enhancing the skill performance of some gymnastics floor movements. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports, 28(4), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2024.0406
Lee, H. C., Lin, Y. J., Kuen Tai, L., Ting Ting, H., & Lai, C. T. J. (2025). Effects of cooperative learning on undergraduate nursing students: a quasi- experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2024-0069
Li, H., & Gan, Z. (2022). Reading motivation, self-regulated reading strategies and English vocabulary knowledge: Which most predicted students’ English reading comprehension? Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041870
Li, H., Gan, Z., Leung, S. O., & An, Z. (2022). the impact of reading strategy instruction on reading comprehension, strategy use, motivation, and self-efficacy in Chinese university EFL students. Sage Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221086659
Li, M.-M., & Tu, C.-C. (2024). Developing a project-based learning course model combined with the think–pair–share strategy to enhance creative thinking skills in education students. Education Sciences, 14(3), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030233
Liu, Y., Thurston, A., & Ye, X. (2024). Technology-enhanced cooperative language learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 124, 102314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102314
Manasa, M. R., Karant, C., & Bhimalli, S. (2023). A comparative study of the efficacy of “Think-Pair-Share” method over tutorials in Pharmacology for undergraduates. Physiology and Pharmacology (Iran), 27(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.52547/phypha.27.1.8
Mertler, C. A. (2024). Introduction to educational research. SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England.
Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldaña, J. (2021). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England.
Moin, H., Majeed, S., Zahra, T., Zafar, S., Nadeem, A., & Majeed, S. (2024). Assessing the impact of jigsaw technique for cooperative learning in undergraduate medical education: merits, challenges, and forward prospects. BMC Medical Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05831-2
Mundelsee, L., & Jurkowski, S. (2021). Think and pair before share: Effects of collaboration on students’ in-class participation. Learning and Individual Differences, 88, 102015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102015
Namaziandost, E., Gilakjani, A. P., & Hidayatullah. (2020). Enhancing pre-intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension through the use of Jigsaw technique. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1738833
Nazari, N., Nafissi, Z., Estaji, M., & Marandi, S. S. (2019). Evaluating novice and experienced EFL teachers’ perceived TPACK for their professional development. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1632010
Peng, P., Wang, W., Filderman, M. J., Zhang, W., & Lin, L. (2024). The active ingredient in reading comprehension strategy intervention for struggling readers: A bayesian network meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 94(2), 228–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231171345
Rice, M., Lambright, K., & Wijekumar, K. (Kay). (2024). Professional development in reading comprehension: A meta‐analysis of the effects on teachers and students. Reading Research Quarterly, 59(3), 424–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.546
Shaik, M. G. (2025). Pedagogical approaches to collaborative learning: An analytical study. 050001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0248162
Wang, Z., & Qian, J. (2020). Action research on flipped classroom model in Chinese context of English linguistics teaching. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1533(4), 042083. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1533/4/042083
Zohrabi, M., & Hassan, J. (2020). The role of think-pair-share interactional activity on improving Iranian EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Teaching English Language, 14(1), 153–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2020.106921
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bambang Widi Pratolo, Dat Bao, Suhendri Palaguna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
