Uyghur and China in The American Media Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of CNN News Articles

Prayudha Prayudha, Ma’ruf Fawwaz

Abstract


This paper analyzes the textual aspects in Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) Norman Fairclough model of CNN news discourse about Uyghur issue. When this research is conducted, there are only at least five articles specifically discussing Uyghur issue that are 29th December 2011, 29th February 2012, 29th February 2012, 30th October 2013, and 5th September 2014 publications. The research focuses on analyzing the text representation and the relation between participants in the discourse. Objectives of the paper are: 1) to analyze the text representation of news in the news channel of CNN related to the Uyghur case, and 2) to analyze the relation between participants in the news channel of CNN related to the Uyghur case. The subject of this paper is Uyghur issue as reflected in the news articles of CNN International. The paper applies qualitative descriptive method. As a consequence: CNN often put formality features and a vague vocabulary to block and obscure the negative value from the readers to China. The relation here is presented by CNN to China rather than CNN to Uyghur. It is reflected by the power of the status of China.


Keywords


critical discourse analysis; Uyghur issue; CNN

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bahador, B. (2007). The CNN effect in action: How the news media pushed the west toward war in Kosovo. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Budairi, A. (2018). Traces of linguistic imperialism enacted through discursive strategies in ELT textbooks in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Educational Journal,1(2), 49-64. doi:10.12928/eltej.v1i2.581

Castets, Rémi. (2003). The Uyghurs in Xinjiang – The Malaise grows. China Perspectives [Online], 49 | september-october 2003, Online since 17 January 2007, connection on 25 February 2020. doi:10.4000/chinaperspectives.648.

Clarke, C. P. & Kan, P. R. (2017). Uyghur Foreign Fighters: An Underexamined Jihadist Challenge. ICCT Policy Brief, 8 (2), 3-19. doi: 10.19165/2017.2.05.

Dawyer, A. M. (2005). The Xinjiang Conflict: Uyghur Identity, Language Policy, and Political Discourse. Washington, DC: East-West Center Washington.

Finley, Joanne Smith. (2019). Securitization, Insecurity and Conflict in Contemporary Xinjiang: Has PRC Counter-Terrorism Evolved into State Terror?. Central Asian Survey, 38 (1), 1-26. Doi:10.1080/02634937.2019.1586348.

Gilbert, Sara. (2013). Built for Success: The Story of CNN. Minnesota: Creative Education.

Human Rights Watch. (2019). Unprecedented UN critique of China’s Xinjiang policies: Growing Outrage over Abuses. Accessed 2 December 2019. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/11/14/unprecedented-un-critique-chinas-xinjiang-policies.

Jai, Kehaulani R. (2016). “Crackdown and consent: China’s war on terror and the strategic creation of a public discourse in the U.S.” Thesis. California: Claremont Colleges.

Jaramillo, Deborah. (2009). Ugly war pretty package: How CNN and Fox news made the invasion of Iraq high concept. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Mahmood, Saba. (2006). Secularism, hermeneutics, and empire: The politics of Islamic reformation. Public Culture, 18(2), 323-347. doi:10.1215/08992363-2006-006.

Meyer, Patrik Kristof. (2012). “Governing moslem minorities as security threats: The case of the Uyghur and the concept of a new Chinese nation”. dissertation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

Fairclough, Norman. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Fairclough, Norman. (1995). Media discourse. New York: Publisher Bloomsbury Publishing.

Fairclough, Norman. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.

Fairclough, Norman. (2013). Language and power discourse: 2nd edition. New York: Rourledge.

Fairclough, Norman. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman Publishing.

Soliev, Nodirbek. (2016). Growing Uyghur militancy: Challenges for China. RSIS Commentary. Retrieved from https://www.rsis.edu.sg.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Diandra Primamitra.

Terhune, V. & Matusitz, J. (2016). The Uyghurs Versus the Chinese Government: An Application of Realistic Conflict Theory. Journal of Applied Security Research, 11 (2), 139-148. doi:/10.1080/19361610.2016.1137174.

Van Dijk, Teun A. 2009. Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Online Sources

https://edition.cnn.com/2011/12/29/world/asia/china-hostage-rescue/index.html. Accessed on Saturday, January 15, 2019.

https://edition.cnn.com/2012/02/29/world/asia/china-riots-archive/index.html Accessed on Saturday, January 15, 2019.

https://edition.cnn.com/2012/02/29/world/asia/china-riots/index.html Accessed on Saturday, January 15, 2019.

https://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/29/world/asia/china-tiananmen-suspects/index.html Accessed on Saturday, January 15, 2019.

https://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/05/world/asia/china-isis/index.html Accessed on Saturday, January 15, 2019.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v2i3.1292

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 prayudha prayudha

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


English Language Teaching Educational Journal
Kampus 4 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Jl. Ringroad Selatan, Tamanan, Bantul, Yogyakarta
E-mail: eltej@pbi.uad.ac.id


e-ISSN: 2621-6485


 

View My Stats