Household intention to eliminate mosquito breeding sites following a single-session Geplakkin intervention

Authors

  • Wahyu Naufal Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak
  • Andri Dwi Hernawan Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak
  • Elly Trisnawati Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak
  • Barry Ceasar Octariadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/jcp.v8i2.16846

Keywords:

Behavioral intention, Dengue prevention, Digital health, Vector surveillance

Abstract

Dengue remains an important public health problem, and household elimination of mosquito breeding sites is central to prevention. Digital technologies may strengthen dengue prevention by integrating health information with vector surveillance, but evidence regarding their relationship with household behavioral intention remains limited. This study evaluated household intention to eliminate mosquito breeding sites following a single-session intervention using the Geplakkin vector surveillance application. A quantitative experiment with a posttest-only control-group design was conducted in Pontianak City, West Kalimantan, Indonesia, from July to October 2025. A total of 320 purposively recruited participants were randomly allocated in a 3:1 ratio to the intervention (n = 240) or control group (n = 80) using a computer-generated sequence. Both groups received routine dengue-prevention education; the intervention group additionally received 15–30 minutes of training on Geplakkin, followed by immediate application use and posttest assessment. Intention was assessed using a Theory of Planned Behavior-based questionnaire. Because scores were not normally distributed, groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. The intervention group had a higher mean intention score than the control group (45.43 ± 4.68 vs 36.73 ± 5.50), with a mean difference of 8.70 points (p < 0.001; effect size = 0.65). Thus, exposure to the single-session Geplakkin intervention was associated with higher immediate intention to eliminate mosquito breeding sites than routine education alone. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether this difference is sustained and translates into household vector-control practices.

References

World Health Organization. Dengue and severe dengue [Internet]. World Health Organization (WHO News Room – Fact Sheets). 2025 [cited 2026 Jun 22]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dengue-and-severe-dengue. Accessed 22 Jun 2026

Zeng Z, Zhan J, Chen L, Chen H, Cheng S. Global, regional, and national dengue burden from 1990 to 2017: A systematic analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2017. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;32:100712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100712

Rocklöv J, Tozan Y. Climate change and the rising infectiousness of dengue. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2019;3:133–42. https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20180123

Semenza JC, Rocklöv J, Ebi KL. Climate Change and Cascading Risks from Infectious Disease. Infect Dis Ther. 2022;11:1371–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00647-3

Nadjib M, Setiawan E, Putri S, Nealon J, Beucher S, Hadinegoro SR, et al. Economic burden of dengue in Indonesia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007038. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007038

Sasmita HI, Neoh K-B, Yusmalinar S, Anggraeni T, Chang N-T, Bong L-J, et al. Ovitrap surveillance of dengue vector mosquitoes in Bandung City, West Java Province, Indonesia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15:e0009896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009896

Wilder-Smith A, Ooi E-E, Horstick O, Wills B. Dengue. The Lancet. 2019;393:350–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32560-1

Leandro A, Maciel-de-Freitas R. Development of an Integrated Surveillance System to Improve Preparedness for Arbovirus Outbreaks in a Dengue Endemic Setting: Descriptive Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024;10:e62759–e62759. https://doi.org/10.2196/62759

Melo CL, Mageste LR, Guaraldo L, Paula DP, Wakimoto MD. Use of Digital Tools in Arbovirus Surveillance: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e57476. https://doi.org/10.2196/57476

Arfan I, Sulistyorini L, Sulistyowati M, Syahrul F, Junaidi H, Rizky A. Benefits and barriers of community participation in dengue control: A systematic review. Afr J Reprod Health. 2024;28:482–98. https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2024/v28i10s.49

World Health Organization (WHO) Indonesia. Ending the burden of dengue infection: Indonesia launched the 2021-2025 National Strategic Plan for Dengue Control Programme [Internet]. World Health Organization Indonesia (WHO Indonesia News Release). 2021 [cited 2026 Jun 22]. https://www.who.int/indonesia/news/detail/15-11-2021-ending-the-burden-of-dengue-infection-indonesia-launched-the-2021-2025-national-strategic-plan-for-dengue-control-programme. Accessed 22 Jun 2026

Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2020;2:314–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195

Vande Velde F, Overgaard HJ, Bastien S. An integrated human behavioral model for mosquito-borne disease control: A scoping review of behavior change theories used to identify key behavioral determinants. Heliyon. 2024;10:e26488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26488

Salim MF, Satoto TBT, . D, Daniel D. Digital Health Interventions in Dengue Surveillance to Detect and Predict Outbreak: A Scoping Review. Open Public Health J. 2024;17. https://doi.org/10.2174/0118749445283264240116070726

Carrillo MA, Kroeger A, Cardenas Sanchez R, Diaz Monsalve S, Runge-Ranzinger S. The use of mobile phones for the prevention and control of arboviral diseases: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10126-4

Naing C, Htet NH, Tung WS, Aung HH, Whittaker MA. Facilitators and barriers to engaging communities in health service research on dengue control in Indo-Pacific region: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:1924. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16845-8

Wahab A, Laksanawati IS, Padmawati RS, Mulyadi AWE, Triadmajani W, Thobari JA. Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding dengue vaccine: a baseline study of community members and health providers in Indonesia. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2025;68:228–37. https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2024.00962

Llorente-Pérez YJ, Rodríguez-Acelas AL, Cañon-Montañez W. Educational interventions for the prevention and control of dengue in adults: An integrative review. Enfermería Clínica (English Edition). 2023;33:157–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2022.10.005

Amalia I, Andono Ahmad R, Lazuardi L. Optimizing dengue surveillance with “Tunggal Dara” android-based application: key findings for sustainable implementation. BKM Public Health & Community Medicine (Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat. 2023;39:2023. https://doi.org/10.22146/bkm.v39i07.8793

Herbuela VRDM, Karita T, Francisco ME, Watanabe K. An Integrated mHealth App for Dengue Reporting and Mapping, Health Communication, and Behavior Modification: Development and Assessment of Mozzify. JMIR Form Res. 2020;4:e16424. https://doi.org/10.2196/16424

World Health Organization. Engaging communities to sustain dengue vector control. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2026.

Widyantoro W, Nurjazuli N, Hanani Y. Pengendalian Demam Berdarah Dengue (DBD) Berbasis Masyarakat di Indonesia: Systematic Review. Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat. 2021;10:200–7. https://doi.org/10.33221/jikm.v10i03.1008

Gopalan RB, Babu BV, Sugunan AP, Murali A, Ma MS, Balasubramanian R, et al. Community engagement to control dengue and other vector-borne diseases in Alappuzha municipality, Kerala, India. Pathog Glob Health. 2021;115:258–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2021.1890886

Annan E, Guo J, Angulo-Molina A, Yaacob WFW, Aghamohammadi N, C. Guetterman T, et al. Community acceptability of dengue fever surveillance using unmanned aerial vehicles: A cross-sectional study in Malaysia, Mexico, and Turkey. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2022;49:102360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102360

Mathur D, Patel M, Vyas P, Kaushal R, Dash GC, Goel AD, et al. Revitalising community engagement and surveillance challenges for strengthening dengue control in Jodhpur, Western Rajasthan, India — A mixed method study. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13:1755–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.08.005

Kunasagran PD, Syed Abdul Rahim SS, Chun Chao GG, Muyou AJ, Sidek ZN, Hidrus A, et al. A Systematic Review of Communication for Behavioural Impact (COMBI) as a Dengue Prevention Programme. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2025;32:73. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms-07-2024-527

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30

How to Cite

Naufal, W. ., Hernawan, A. D., Trisnawati , E. ., & Octariadi , B. C. (2026). Household intention to eliminate mosquito breeding sites following a single-session Geplakkin intervention. Jurnal Cakrawala Promkes, 8(2), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.12928/jcp.v8i2.16846

Issue

Section

Article