Peer Review Process

1. The editorial team will do a preliminary evaluation to assess whether the submission is suitable for the Jurnal Cakrawala Promkes based on focus and scope, methodological flaw, readability of the manuscripts, using Mendeley as a tool reference manager, plagiarism check, and adhering to the submitted paper template.

In this step, the editorial team will make a recommendation to the authors based on the rankings and comments received in 10–14 days, with a final decision:

• Decline: The author can't submit the manuscript with the same title or the same topic
• Pre-review: In this step, the author will receive a pre-review manuscript from the editorial team within one week.
• Proceed to blinded peer review process: The manuscript will be sent to the independent reviewers.

2. If the Editorial team decides the paper is proceeded to blinded peer review, the Editor in Chief will assign the paper to a Section Editor.
3. Section editor will send the manuscript to at least two anonymous reviewers with same topic of interest.
4. The reviewers could give comments and advice to the authors on how to revise and improve the manuscript and recommend the editorial teams five alternative decisions:

• Accept submission.
• Revisions required.
• Resubmit for review.
• Resubmit elsewhere.
• Decline submission.
  5. The anonymous reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions, responses and required revisions. After the author sends the revised manuscript, the editorial team suggests the final decision.
  6. In the end, the Editorial team will use Ithenticate to convey the final choice to the relevant author with a maximum similarity score of 20%.
  7. The accepted manuscript underwent additional copyediting and layout editing to ensure the work was suitable for publication.