Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
- Editors first review the submitted manuscript. It will be desk evaluated whether the submitted manuscript is suitable for the Jurnal Cakrawala Promkes based on focus and scope, methodological flaw, readability of the articles, using Mendeley as a tool reference manager and adhering to the submitted paper template.
- Furthermore, the manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Double-Blind Peer-Review).
- The anonymous reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses. Afterward, the editorial team meeting suggested the final decision to the revised manuscript by authors.
- Finally, the Editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author with a maximum similarity score 20% by using Ithenticate.
- The accepted manuscript then continued the copyediting and layout editing process to prepare the camera-ready paper.
Review Outcomes
Utilizing feedback from the peer review process, the Editor will make a final publication decision. The review process will take approximately 2 to 10 weeks. Decisions categories include:
- Reject - Rejected manuscripts will not be published, and authors will not have the opportunity to resubmit a revised version of the manuscript to JCP.
- Accept with Revisions - Manuscripts receiving an accept-pending-revisions decision will be published in JCP under the condition that Minor or Major modifications are made. Revisions will be reviewed by an editorial team to ensure necessary updates are made prior to publication.
- Accept - Accepted manuscripts will be published in the current form, with no further modifications required.
