Documentation of implemented of Nursing process in Jugal Hospital Harar Ethiopia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/commicast.v3i2.5760Keywords:
Documentation , Nursing process , ImplementationAbstract
Nursing care documentation has been defined as the record of nursing care that is planned and performed to specific patients and by nurses since the early days of Nightingale. To assess Documentation of Implemented nursing process in Jugal Hospital, Harar, Ethiopia. At Jugal hospital in Harar town, 525 kilometers east of Addis Ababa, hospital-based retrospective study design was used and the research took place from January 1st to 27th,2022.The sample size was derived using the single population proportion calculation, the total sample size was 289. IBM SPSS software package version 20.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used to enter, clean, and analyze data. The overall the implementation of the nursing process in this study is 62.97 %, With regards to the specific components implemented the result shows that 35.99% charts were recorded with assessment and diagnosis part of the nursing process followed by planning 29.07 % whereas implementation and evaluation parts were the least documented in the hospital. In nursing practice, documentation is important; hence it is believed that what is not recorded has not been done and lack of documentation may make it suspicious that they did not do their duty. So the nursing process committees or the hospital matron and the nurse managers at the hospital should conduct routine supportive supervision on NP.
References
Al-Jubouri, M. B., Samson-Akpan, P., Al-Fayyadh, S., Machuca-Contreras, F. A., Unim, B., Stefanovic, S. M., Alabdulaziz, H., Oducado, R. M. F., George, A. N., Ates, N. A., Radabutr, M., Kamau, S., & Almazan, J. (2021). Incivility among nursing faculty: A multi-country study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.04.002
Baker, C., Cary, A. H., & da Conceicao Bento, M. (2021). Global standards for professional nursing education: The time is now. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.10.001
Chiffi, D. (2021). Nursing knowledge and values. In Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (Vol. 58). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59094-9_9
Deliktas, A., Korukcu, O., Aydin, R., & Kabukcuoglu, K. (2019). Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Nursing Metaparadigms: A Phenomenological Study. Journal of Nursing Research, 27(5). https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000311
Entman, R. M. (2020). African Americans According to TV News. In The Media in Black and White. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351303484-6
Hammerschmidt, J., & Manser, T. (2019). Nurses’ knowledge, behaviour and compliance concerning hand hygiene in nursing homes: A cross-sectional mixed-methods study. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4347-z
Honkavuo, L. (2021). Ethics simulation in nursing education: Nursing students’ experiences. Nursing Ethics, 28(7–8). https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733021994188
Hussey, P. (2021). Introduction to Nursing Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58740-6_1
Iheduru-Anderson, K. C., & Wahi, M. M. (2021). Rejecting the myth of equal opportunity: an agenda to eliminate racism in nursing education in the United States. BMC Nursing, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00548-9
Kennedy, M. A., & Hussey, P. (2015). Nursing informatics. In Introduction to Nursing Informatics, Fourth Edition. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2999-8_2
LaBronte, K. H., Friddle, K., & Koehn, A. (2019). Nursing Research. In Neonatal Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review: Fast Facts and Practice Questions. https://doi.org/10.5937/sestrec2080004d
Lee, H. J., Winters, C. A., Boland, R. L., Raph, S. W., & Buehler, J. A. (2018). Concept analysis. In Rural Nursing, Fifth Edition: Concepts, Theory, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826161710.0003
Michel, A., Ryan, N., Mattheus, D., Knopf, A., Abuelezam, N. N., Stamp, K., Branson, S., Hekel, B., & Fontenot, H. B. (2021). Undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions on nursing education during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic: A national sample. Nursing Outlook, 69(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2021.05.004
Molla, M. (2014). Assessment of Factors Affecting Implementation of Nursing Process Among Nurses in Selected Governmental Hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Cross Sectional Study. Journal of Nursing & Care, 03(03). https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1168.1000170
N., S., & A., M. (2018). The introduction of the Cumulated Ambulatory Score (CAS) as an outcome measure in the acute rehabilitation of patients with hip fracture. European Geriatric Medicine.
Osman, W., Ninnoni, J. P. K., & Anim, M. T. (2021). Use of the nursing process for patient care in a Ghanaian Teaching Hospital: A cross sectional study. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2021.100281
Pesut, B., Greig, M., Thorne, S., Storch, J., Burgess, M., Tishelman, C., Chambaere, K., & Janke, R. (2020). Nursing and euthanasia: A narrative review of the nursing ethics literature. In Nursing Ethics (Vol. 27, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019845127
Santy-Tomlinson, J., Hertz, K., Myhre-Jensen, C., & Brent, L. (2021). Nursing in the Orthogeriatric Setting. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48126-1_17
Tsimane, T. A., & Downing, C. (2020). Transformative learning in nursing education: A concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.12.006
Wang, N., Hailey, D., & Yu, P. (2011). Quality of nursing documentation and approaches to its evaluation: A mixed-method systematic review. In Journal of Advanced Nursing (Vol. 67, Issue 9). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05634.x
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. In Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Arif Hussen Jamie, Zekeria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Commicast's Posting Your Article Policy at http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/commicast/about/editorialPolicies#custom-5
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Commicast agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Commicast use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
