The effect of interpersonal communication intensity and openness on self-esteem among communication students at Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Muslimah Department of Communication Science, Universitas ‘Aisyiyah Yogyakarta, 55292, Indonesia
  • Erwin Rasyid Department of Agribusiness, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Kalimantan Selatan, 70714, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/commicast.v6i2.14079

Keywords:

Interpersonal Communication, Intensity, Openness, Self-Esteem, University Students

Abstract

Self-esteem is a crucial component of students’ psychological well-being and is strongly shaped by the quality of interpersonal communication. This study investigates the influence of communication intensity and openness on the self-esteem of Communication Science students at Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. A quantitative survey was conducted with 81 randomly selected respondents using a validated questionnaire. Data were analyzed through Pearson correlation and simple linear regression. The results indicate that openness has a moderate positive correlation with self-esteem (r = 0.402, p < 0.05), while intensity shows a lower yet significant correlation (r = 0.363, p < 0.05). Together, the two variables explain 16.2% of the variance in self-esteem, although only openness demonstrates a near-significant individual effect. These findings suggest that the quality of communication is more influential than its frequency in shaping self-esteem. The study contributes to communication science by extending Social Penetration Theory within the Indonesian context and emphasizing openness as a key factor in student development. Practically, the findings encourage universities to integrate open-communication training and peer-mentoring programs to support students’ psychological well-being. The main limitation of this study is the relatively small sample and focus on a single program, which restricts generalizability. Future research should involve larger and more diverse populations and include additional variables such as emotional intelligence and social support to provide a more comprehensive understanding.

References

Alwahaishi, S., Al-Ahmadi, M. S., Ali, Z., & Al-Jabri, I. (2024). Self-Disclosure on Social Media: Do Personality Traits Matter? Sage Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241255754

Ashuri, T., & Halperin, R. (2024). Online self-disclosure: An interdisciplinary literature review of 10 years of research. New Media &Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241247313

Beckers, D., Larsen, J. K., & Burk, W. J. (2023). Self-esteem and negative affectivity as mediators of the prospective links between adolescent interpersonal peer problems and disordered eating behaviors. Appetite, 186, 106558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106558

Bremer, V., Funk, B., & Riper, H. (2019). Heterogeneity Matters: Predicting Self-Esteem in Online Interventions Based on Ecological Momentary Assessment Data. Depression Research and Treatment, 2019, 3481624. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3481624

Chen, H. T., & Li, X. (2017). The contribution of mobile social media to social capital and psychological well-being: Examining the role of communicative use, friending and self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563217303825

Chu, T. H., Sun, M., & Jiang, L. C. (2023). Self-disclosure in social media and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221119429

Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches - John W. Creswell, J. David Creswell - Google Books. In SAGE Publications, Inc.

Effendy, O. U. (2003). Ilmu, Teori dan Filsafat Komunikasi. In Citra Aditya.

Enting, M., Jongerling, J., & Reitz, A. K. (2025). Self-esteem and social interactions in daily life: An experience sampling study. European Journal of Personality, 39(5), 697–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070241292987

Fazhari, S., & Rudianto, R. (2021). Influence of interpersonal communication of chairman and employees on employee performance Inna Parapat Hotel and Resort. COMMICAST, 3(1), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.12928/commicast.v3i1.3510

Forest, A. L., Sigler, K. N., Bain, K. S., O’Brien, E. R., & Wood, J. V. (2023). Self-esteem’s impacts on intimacy-building: Pathways through self-disclosure and responsiveness. Current Opinion in Psychology. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X23000416

Haq, E.-U., Jangra, S., De, S., Sastry, N., & Tyson, G. (2025). Unpacking the Layers: Exploring Self-Disclosure Norms, Engagement Dynamics, and Privacy Implications. Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, 1890–1899. https://doi.org/10.1145/3701716.3717740

He, X. (2022). Relationship between Self‐Esteem, Interpersonal Trust, and Social Anxiety of College Students. In Occupational Therapy International. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8088754

Jalan, A., Matkovskyy, R., Urquhart, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2023). The role of interpersonal trust in cryptocurrency adoption. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443122001871

Kırcaburun, K., Kokkinos, C. M., Demetrovics, Z., Király, O., Griffiths, M. D., & Çolak, T. S. (2019). Problematic Online Behaviors among Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Associations between Cyberbullying Perpetration, Problematic Social Media Use, and Psychosocial Factors. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9894-8

Konijn, E. A., Utz, S., Tanis, M., & Barnes, S. B. (2008). Mediated interpersonal communication. In Mediated Interpersonal Communication. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203926864

Nurhidayah, S., & Fadillah, D. (2024). Political communication strategies of local politicians in the political constellation of legislative elections at the Regency/City level. COMMICAST, 5(2), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.12928/commicast.v5i2.10746

Ponco, D. (2018). Ilmu komunikasi. In Bandung Rosdakarya.

Ruppel, E. K., Gross, C., Stoll, A., Peck, B. S., & Allen, M. (2017). Reflecting on connecting: Meta-analysis of differences between computer-mediated and face-to-face self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article-abstract/22/1/18/3976923

Shang, A., Feng, L., Yan, G., & Sun, L. (2025). The relationship between self-esteem and social avoidance among university students: chain mediating effects of resilience and social distress. In BMC psychology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02444-2

Shim, H., Cho, J., & Sung, Y. H. (2024). Unveiling secrets to AI agents: Exploring the interplay of conversation type, self-disclosure, and privacy insensitivity. In Asian Communication Research. acr.comm.or.kr. https://acr.comm.or.kr/xml/41457/41457.pdf

Szcześniak, M., Bajkowska, I., Czaprowska, A., & Silenska, A. (2022). Adolescents’ self-esteem and life satisfaction: Communication with peers as a mediator. In International journal of Environ. Res. Public Health. mdpi.com. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3777

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. In International journal of medical Education. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4205511/

Tonder, J. I. van, Jordaan, J., & Esterhuyse, K. (2023). Self-esteem, interpersonal communication competence, and media and technology usage as predictors of loneliness among university students. Sage Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221148379

Wang, X., & Ye, M. (2023). Does interpersonal trust matter? the influence of interpersonal trust on haze risk perception. Environmental Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2023.2234647

WHO. (2020). Immunisation coverage. World Health Organization.

Yan, R., Gong, X., Xu, H., & Yang, Q. (2024). Seeing the forest and the trees: a meta-analysis of the antecedents to online self-disclosure. Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-05-2022-0358

Yan, X. (2025). Interpersonal Trust. In The ECPH Encyclopedia of Psychology. Springer.

You, C., & Zhong, Y. (2022). The Effect of Nostalgic Contents on Self-Esteem: The Mediating Role of Loneliness. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 1587–1599. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S366135

You, S., & Shin, K. (2016). Body Dissatisfaction and Mental Health Outcomes Among Korean College Students. Psychological Reports, 118(3), 714–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116648634

Zheng, M., Peng, K., Yan, W., Lin, Y., Ni, Z., & Zhang, P. (2022). Self-control protects Tibetan adolescent orphans from mental problems: A mediating role of self-esteem. Journal of Adolescence, 94(2), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12025

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Muslimah, M., & Rasyid, E. (2025). The effect of interpersonal communication intensity and openness on self-esteem among communication students at Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. COMMICAST, 6(2), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.12928/commicast.v6i2.14079

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): September

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Muslimah, Erwin Rasyid

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Commicast's Posting Your Article Policy at http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/commicast/about/editorialPolicies#custom-5
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Commicast agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Commicast use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:

Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing

The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.

Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.

Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.