Understanding paid subscription news: Audience perspectives on Readers' experiences and challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/commicast.v7i1.13072Keywords:
Filter bubble, Hoaxes, Paid subscription news, Readers’ acceptance, PolarizationAbstract
Economic disruption in the digital media industry has encouraged news organizations to adopt subscription-based schemes as a sustainability strategy; however, within an ecosystem dominated by advertising-driven platforms and algorithmic personalization, news consumers are increasingly exposed to declining journalistic quality, widespread misinformation, reduced information diversity, and the reinforcement of filter bubbles. Against this backdrop, this study aims to examine the consumption of subscription-based news in Indonesia by analyzing readers’ acceptance of this model and their capacity to address issues of information quality, misinformation, diversity of sources, and polarization. This research employs a phenomenological approach, collecting data through in-depth interviews with three participants from the millennial and Generation Z cohorts who had accessed paid news services in Indonesia, which were subsequently analyzed using descriptive qualitative techniques. The findings indicate that subscription schemes contribute to improved quality and depth of news consumption, as subscribers tend to be more selective and place greater value on journalistic standards, whereas non-subscribers rely more heavily on free sources that are often less comprehensive. Nevertheless, paid access also carries the potential to restrict information availability and narrow the range of perspectives encountered. This study finds no conclusive evidence that subscription-based consumption mitigates polarization or significantly reduces the filter bubble effect. Therefore, this research demonstrates that subscription-based journalism can enhance information quality and limit exposure to misinformation, yet simultaneously risks fostering information exclusivity, underscoring the need for news organizations to balance monetization strategies with broader commitments to accessibility, diversity, and informational inclusivity.
References
Agarwal, S. (2025). Rooting platform dependencies in the digital news economy: Google news initiative in India. International Journal of Communication. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/22342
Aharoni, T. (2025). Beyond audience evaluations: Re-Thinking news trust in digital environments. Journalism Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2025.2588239
Andres, N. (2016). Media-elite interactions in post-authoritarian Indonesia. researchportal.murdoch.edu.au. https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=61MUN_INST&filePid=13137005250007891&download=true
Asif, M. (2024). Digitalization for sustainable buildings: Technologies, applications, potential, and challenges. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 450). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141814
Aslan Ozgul, B., & Veneti, A. (2021). The different organizational structures of alternative media: Through the perspective of alternative media journalists in Turkey and Greece. Digital Journalism, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1943482
Bahar, V. S., & Hasan, M. (2025). # Fakefamous: how do influencers use disinformation to establish long-term credibility on social media? Information Technology &People. https://www.emerald.com/itp/article-abstract/38/6/2441/1253222
Behre, J., Hölig, S., & Möller, J. (2023). Reuters Institute digital news report 2023: Ergebnisse für Deutschland. ssoar.info. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/86851/ssoar-2023-behre_et_al-Reuters_Institute_Digital_News_Report.pdf
Bodó, B. (2019). Selling News to Audiences – A Qualitative Inquiry into the Emerging Logics of Algorithmic News Personalization in European Quality News Media. Digital Journalism, 7(8), 1054–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1624185
Bodó, B., Helberger, N., Eskens, S., & Möller, J. (2019). Interested in Diversity. Digital Journalism, 7(2), 206–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1521292
Chen, W., & Thorson, E. (2021). Perceived individual and societal values of news and paying for subscriptions. Journalism, 22(6), 1296–1316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919847792
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th Edition ed.). Sage Publishing.
De-Lara, A., Carvajal, M., Foá, C., Arias-Robles, F., & Quiles-Moran, B. (2023). IBERIFIER reports–analysis of trends and innovations in the media ecosystem in Spain and Portugal (2025-2030). dadun.unav.edu. http://dx.doi.org/doi.org/10.15581/026.006
Douglas, D. G. (2012). The social construction of technological systems, anniversary edition: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. books.google.com.
Evans, R., Jackson, D., & Murphy, J. (2023). Google News and Machine Gatekeepers: Algorithmic Personalisation and News Diversity in Online News Search. Digital Journalism, 11(9), 1682–1700. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2055596
Gao, R. X. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in manufacturing: State of the art, perspectives, and future directions. CIRP Annals, 73(2), 723–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.101
Haim, M., Graefe, A., & Brosius, H.-B. (2018). Burst of the Filter Bubble? Digital Journalism, 6(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1338145
Hermida, A., & Young, M. L. (2021). Journalism innovation in a time of survival. News Media Innovation Reconsidered: Ethics and values in a creative reconstruction of journalism. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119706519.ch3
Koivula, M., Villi, M., & Sivunen, A. (2023). Creativity and innovation in technology-mediated journalistic work: Mapping out enablers and constraints. Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1788962
Magin, M., Geiß, S., Stark, B., & Jürgens, P. (2022). Common Core in Danger? Personalized Information and the Fragmentation of the Public Agenda. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(4), 887–909. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211026595
Makhortykh, M., & Wijermars, M. (2023). Can Filter Bubbles Protect Information Freedom? Discussions of Algorithmic News Recommenders in Eastern Europe. Digital Journalism, 11(9), 1597–1621. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1970601
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., & Robertson, C. T. (2024). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2023 (report, 21 June 2023). https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-06/Digital_News_Report_2023.pdf
Nieborg, D., Poell, T., & Deuze, M. (2025). The platformization of making media. Making Media. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.5117/9789462988118-8&type=chapterpdf
Qin, Y. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Economic Development: An Evolutionary Investigation and Systematic Review. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 1736–1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01183-2
Ross Tapsell. (2015). Indonesia’s Media Oligarchy and the “Jokowi Phenomenon.” Indonesia, 99, 29. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.99.0029
Ruiz, C. D. (2025). Disinformation on digital media platforms: A market-shaping approach. New Media &Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231207644
Schmidt, S. (2007). Das online-erfolgsmodell digitaler Produkte: Strategische Wirkungspotenziale und operative Handlungsoptionen. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9679-0_4
Sehl, A., & Eder, M. (2023). News Personalization and Public Service Media: The Audience Perspective in Three European Countries. Journalism and Media, 4(1), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia4010022
Simon, F. M., & Isaza-Ibarra, L. F. (2023). AI in the news: reshaping the information ecosystem? ora.ox.ac.uk. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:9947240c-06d3-42c2-9a23-57ff4559b63c
Smith, J. A. (2019). Participants and researchers searching for meaning: Conceptual developments for interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1540648
Spyridou, P. (Lia), Djouvas, C., & Milioni, D. (2022). Modeling and Validating a News Recommender Algorithm in a Mainstream Medium-Sized News Organization: An Experimental Approach. Future Internet, 14(10), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14100284
Suciati, T. N., & Fauziah, N. (2020). Layak berita ke layak jual: Nilai berita jurnalisme online Indonesia di era attention economy. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, 3(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.24329/jurkom.v3i1.105
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tunjung Senja Widuri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Commicast's Posting Your Article Policy at http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/commicast/about/editorialPolicies#custom-5
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Commicast agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Commicast use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
