A Influence of "All Eyes on the Judiciary" Twitter Campaigns on the Outcome of the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal in Nigeria

Authors

  • Onyebuchi Alexander Chima Department of Mass Communication, Imo State University, Owerri
  • Emeka Etumnu Department of Mass Communication, Imo State University Owerri
  • Okoye Loveth Department of Mass Communication, Imo State University, Owerri
  • Igwemeziri Wisdom Chimeziea Department of Mass Communication, Imo State University, Owerri
  • Alaekwe kizito Nzube Department of Mass Communication, Imo State University Owerri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/commicast.v5i2.11089

Keywords:

Twitter , Election , Judiciary , Petition Tribunal , Campaigns

Abstract

In recent times, allegations of electoral and judicial fraud have been alarming. Hence, this study aims to investigate the influence of "All Eyes on the Judiciary" Twitter campaigns on the outcome of the presidential election petition tribunal in Nigeria. The public sphere theory served as the theoretical foundation for the study. In this study, the survey research method was used with a population of 5,100,000 and a sample size of 385, which was derived from the Survey Monkey online sample size calculator. A purposeful sampling technique was employed. The instrument used was an online questionnaire. The data was analysed using percentages and mean analysis. Results showed that, at an average of 74.0%, citizens are exposed to the “all eyes on the judiciary” Twitter campaigns on the outcome of the presidential election petition tribunal in Nigeria to a large extent. Findings revealed that, at a mean of 1.8 (N = 372), the “all eyes on the judiciary” Twitter campaigns did not influence the outcome of the presidential election petition tribunal in Nigeria. It was concluded that as much as the exposure of respondents to the campaigns was high, so was its usefulness. The campaign could not influence the outcome of the presidential election petition tribunal in Nigeria.

References

Acheampong, M. (2023). Overpromising and underdelivering? Digital technology in Nigeria’s 2023 Presidential Elections. Hamburg: German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA).

Adejumo, H. O. N. J. B. A. (2011). The Judiciary And The Rule Of Law : Challenges Of Adjudication In The Electoral Process Being Text Of A Paper Delivered By : At The Series Of Events Organised To Mark The 2011 Law Week Of The Law Students ’ Association Of The University Of Abuja , At The .

Adinda putri, A. P. S. K., & Filosa gita, F. G. S. (2022). Representation of globalization on Youtube video “Wonderland Indonesia.” COMMICAST, 3(2), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.12928/commicast.v3i2.5950

Agbim, K. C., Etumnu, E. W., & Iredibia, K. U. (2023). the Obidient Movement on Twitter and 2023 General Election in Nigeria: an Extrapolative Analysis. IMSU Journal of Communication Studies, 7(1), 347–358.

Akeaya-Inne. (2023). High tech failed to make Nigeria’s presidential election transparent. Dandc.Eu. https://www.dandc.eu/en/article/nigerianvoters-are-frustrated-because-digital-election-tools-did-not-deliverpromised

Alegu, Maku, Adelaja, R. (2021). Social media , propaganda and electioneering campaigns : The Nigerian Social media , propaganda and electioneering campaigns : The Nigerian experience ( 1999 – 2019 ). November, 4–13.

Animashaun, K. (2010). Regime Character, Electoral Crisis and Prospects of Electoral Reform in Nigeria. Journal of Nigeria Studies, 1(1).

Ayika, V. O. (2022). An Analysis Of The Discretionary Powers Of The Court : A Case Study Of Election Petition Tribunal Decisions . Valentine Ogbonna Ayika Pg / Nls / 1900016 A Dissertation Submitted To The National Institute For Legislative And Democratic Studies University O. Dissertation, Llm, 1–105.

Bello, B. S., Inuwa-Dutse, I., & Heckel, R. (2019). Social Media Campaign Strategies: Analysis of the 2019 Nigerian Elections. 2019 Sixth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1109/SNAMS.2019.8931869

Bello, O. S., & Famoroti, A. J. (2023). Exigencies and Controversies of Democracy in Nigeria. Nsukka Journal of the Humanities, 31(1), 91–10. https://doi.org/10.62250/nsuk.2023.31.1.91-100

Birch, S. (2008). Electoral institutions and popular confidence in electoral processes: A cross-national analysis. Electoral Studies, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.005

Brookes, R. (2004). The media representation of public opinion: British television news coverage of the 2001 general election. In Media, Culture and Society (Vol. 26, Issue 1, pp. 63–80). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443704039493

Burchard, S. M., & Simati, M. (2019). The Role of the Courts in Mitigating Election Violence in Nigeria. Cadernos de Estudos Africanos, 38, 123–144. https://doi.org/10.4000/cea.4407

Carlos, K. A., Vargas, D., Estigoy, M. A., & Hail, P. (2022). Effects of Social Media on Political Communication. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4157044

Carter, E., & Farrell, D. M. (2010). Electoral systems and election management. In Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in the 21st Century. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288740.n2

Commonwealth, T. (2014). Credible elections are the ‘heartbeat’ of democracy, says Sharma. Thecommonwealth.Org. https://thecommonwealth.org/news/credible-elections-are-heartbeat-democracy-says-sharma

Dahlgren P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation PoliticalCommunication.

Dungse, Y., Opeyemi, M., & Chidozie, O. (2018). Social Media, Political Mobilisation and Paticipatory Politics in Nigeria.

Etumnu, E. W. (2021). Effectiveness of Social Media Platforms in Combating Extremism, Hate Speech, and Fake News in Nigeria.

Fasakin, A. (2022). Nigeria’s 2023 presidential elections: The question of legitimacy for the Tinubu administration. Journal of African Elections, 22(2), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.20940/JAE/2023/v22i2a5

Giorgi, S., Lynn, V. E., Gupta, K., Ahmed, F., Matz, S., Ungar, L. H., & Schwartz, H. A. (2022). Correcting Sociodemographic Selection Biases for Population Prediction from Social Media. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 16. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19287

Godwin, A., & Ph, M. (2018). Twitter and Election Campaigns : Measuring Usage in Nigeria ’ s 2015 Presidential Election. 5(2), 44–65.

Habermas, J. (2006a). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? Communication Theory, 16(4).

Habermas, J. (2006b). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x

Habib. (2023). #NigeriaElections2023: Commonwealth Observers say Election “largely peaceful.” Punch Newspaper.

Hebermas J. (1962). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. The MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262581080/the-structural-transformation-of-the-public-sphere/

Ibeanu, O. O. (2022). Digital Technologies and Election Management in Africa’s Democratisation Process: More Technocratic than Democratic? Africa Development, 47(2). https://doi.org/10.57054/ad.v47i2.2197

Igiebor G.O. (2022). The effects of security challenges on electoral participation in Nigeria: The Fourth Republic in Focus. Benue Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies (BRNJOPCES), 1(1), 154–175. https://www.bsum.edu.ng/journals/benjopecs/vol1n1//article10

Ijaseun D. (2023). INEC still uploading results 87 Days after Presidential Election. Business Day.

Iruke C. (2023). Taking Stock of Nigeria’s 2023 Presidential Election Petition Tribunal. Www.Cddwestafrica.Org. https://www.cddwestafrica.org/blog/taking-stock-of-nigeria-s-2023-presidential-election-petition-tribunal/

Itodo S. (2023). Elements of voter suppression and manipulation have plagued the Elections – Itodo. Arise Television. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bL0fTvHBzuc&t=185s

Iwuoha, V. C., Anichebe, O., Obi, K. C., Alumona, I. M., Ojimba, A. C., & Obiorji, J. N. (2021). Election Logistics and Political Meddling: Rethinking the Use of ‘Town Service’ Buses in Transporting Election Materials in Nigeria. Society, 58(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00577-9

Kadijat, K. K., Ayotunde, K. A., & Haroon-Sulyman, S. O. (2020). Twitter Discourse on the Pre-Presidential Election Campaign in Nigeria. Jurnal The Messenger, 12(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v12i2.2457

Kim, G. M. H. (2016). Transcultural digital literacies: Cross-border connections and self-representations in an online forum. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.131

Lindøe, P. (2006). The use of metaphors in communicating risk and conflicting goals. In Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference 2006, ESREL 2006 - Safety and Reliability for Managing Risk (Vol. 2, pp. 1315–1320). https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/56249126471

Loveth, O., C., A. K., M., O. K., W., E. E., Okodogbe, P., & Odionyenma, C. U. (2022). Effectiveness of Mass Media in the Fight against Drug Abuse among Undergraduates of Tertiary Institutions in Imo State. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.9734/sajsse/2022/v14i330380

Mamman, Y. (2019). Political Perception Of State Assembly Members From 2015. 12(1), 1–7.

McQuail, D. (2004). Mass Communication Theory (Fifth Edit). London: Sage Publications.

Munardin Hadma, A., & Dwi Anggoro, J. (2021). Political communication in the age of social media. COMMICAST, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.12928/commicast.v3i1.5114

Nesgroup.org. (2023). The Process of Filing Petitions with the Election Tribunal in Nigeria. Nesgroup.Org. https://nesgroup.org/blog/The-Jurisdiction-of-the-Election-Tribunal-in-Nigeria

Nsude, I., Onwe, E. C., Ezeah, G. H., Ph, D., Asogwa, C. E., Obiorah, I., Vivian, I., Elizabeth, C., & Faith, C. (2016). Social Media As A Political Platform In Nigeria : A Focus On Electorates In South-Eastern Nigeria. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science Ver. III, 16(11).

Nwamara, C., & Etumnu, E. W. (2022). Influence of the Mass Media on Electorate’s Participation in the 2021 Anambra State Gubernatorial Election in the Wake of Insecurity. 2550–7302.

O’Neill, J. (2002). The rhetoric of deliberation: Some problems in Kantian theories of deliberative democracy. Res Publica, 8(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020899224058

Obi, C. I. (2008). International election observer missions and the promotion of democracy: Some lessons from Nigeria’s 2007 elections. Politikon, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02589340802113089

Okoro, N., & Nwafo, K. A. (2013). Social Media and Political Participation in Nigeria during the 2011 General Elections: The Lapses and the Lessons. Global Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3).

Okoro, N., & Santas, T. (2017). An appraisal of the utilisation of social media for political communication in the 2011 Nigerian presidential election. African Research Review, 11(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v11i1.9

Olabanjo, O., Wusu, A., Asokere, M., Padonu, R., Olabanjo, O., Ojo(Olayiwola), O., Afisi, O., Folorunso, O., Mazzara, M., & Aribisala, B. (2022). From Twitter to Aso-Rock: A Natural Language Processing Spotlight for Understanding Nigeria 2023 Presidential Election. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202210.0238.v1

Orji, N. (2014). Nigeria’s 2015 election in perspective. Africa Spectrum, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/000203971404900306

Pérez-Martínez, V., Rodríguez González, M., & Tobajas Gracia, M. (2017). Mobilization and political participation on Twitter. Case study of the hashtag #SuperTuesday in the primaries of the presidential elections of the United States 2016. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1186en

Polat R. (2007). Can the Internet increase political participation? Political Communication Report. Jour.Unr.Edu. www.jour.unr.edu/pcr/1702

Samosir, O. (2021). Looking For The Form Of Indonesian Democracy: Study Of Pancasila Ideology Towards Concurrent Elections In 2024. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v2i4.831

Shadrach I & Apuke O D. (2020). Investigating the Effectiveness of Social Media Usage for Political Dialogue in Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), 3942. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3942

Shuaibu, A., Dasuki, S., & Kah, M. (2019). Investigating the Implementation of ICT Tool to Electoral Process in Nigeria (pp. 181–191). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18400-1_15

Statcounter.com. (2023). Social media stats Nigeria. Gs.Statcounter.Com. https://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats/all/nigeria

Stier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H., & Strohmaier, M. (2018). Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Communication, 35(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728

Tayo-Garbson, S. U., Njoku, F. C., & Etumnu, E. W. (2019). Owerri residents’ perception of women in journalism practice. SAU Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 4(1/2).

Times, P. (2023). Commonwealth Observers say Nigeria’s 2023 Elections “largely peaceful” with Room for Improvement. Premium Times.

Travesty, T. O. R. (1997). Nigeria Transition Or Travesty ? Nigeria = s Endless Process of Return to Civilian Rule. 9(6).

Umoh, E. (2021). Election Management Body and the Challenges of Elections in Nigeria: An Exploratory Analyses of Elections (1999-2019).

Wadud, M. (2021). Book Review: McQuail’s media & mass communication theory. Electronic News, 15(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431211019780

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Onyebuchi , A. C. ., Etumnu, E., Okoye, . L., Igwemeziri , W. . C. ., & Alaekwe , K. N. (2024). A Influence of "All Eyes on the Judiciary" Twitter Campaigns on the Outcome of the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal in Nigeria. COMMICAST, 5(2), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.12928/commicast.v5i2.11089

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): September

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Onyebuchi Alexander Chima, Emeka Etumnu, Okoye Loveth, Igwemeziri Wisdom Chimeziea, Alaekwe kizito Nzube

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Commicast's Posting Your Article Policy at http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/commicast/about/editorialPolicies#custom-5
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Commicast agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Commicast use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:

Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing

The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.

Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.

Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.