Analysis of Linear Equating of Senior School Certificate Multiple-Choice Examination Papers in Economics

Authors

  • Dorcas Sola Daramola Department of Social Sciences Education, Faculty of Education, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.
  • Adekunle Thomas Olutola Federal University Dutsin-Ma, Katsina State, Nigeria http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-793X
  • Mohammed Idris Jimoh Department of Social Sciences Education, Faculty of Education, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/spekta.v3i2.4447

Keywords:

Linear equating, Economics, Multiple-Choice Papers, Unique Items, Anchor Items

Abstract

Background: Test equating methods are statistical tools used to produce exchangeable scores across different test forms. However, people believe that it is impossible to develop multiple forms of tests that have the same psychometric properties.

Contribution: The study therefore analyzed the linear equating of senior school certificate multiple-choice examination papers in Economics.

Method: A Non-equivalent Groups Anchor Test (NEAT) design was adopted for the study. The sample for the study consisted of 1,119 senior secondary three students. The 2009 WAEC, NECO, and NABTEB SSCE multiple-choice Economics papers were adapted and used for data collection with 0.67, 0.64, and 0.60 coefficients of content validity as well as 0.79, 0.76, and 0.70 reliability coefficients. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics, T-scores, and Analysis of Variance. 

Results: Findings revealed that there was no difference in examinees’ ability, thus equating process could take place. The finding also revealed an F-value of 1.953, which was not significant at the 0.05 alpha level since the p-value (0.142) was greater than 0.05. It showed a score of 41 in WAEC and NECO was equivalent to 42 in NABTEB. It also showed a score of 45 in WAEC was equivalent to 46 and 50 in NECO and NABTEB respectively.

Conclusion: The researchers therefore concluded that the 2009 WAEC and NECO SSCE Economics multiple-choice items tended to be equivalent while that of NABTEB was different. It was recommended among others that a regulatory body could be established to monitor and standardize these examinations conducted in Nigeria

References

Adom, D., Mensah, J. A. & Dake, D. A. (2020). Test, measurement, and evaluation: Understanding and use of the concepts in education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9 (1), pp. 109~119. Available at http://ijere.iaescore.com

Linn, R. L., (2008). Measurement and assessment in teaching. India: Pearson Education.

Allison, M. (2011). Student standardized testing: current practices in OECD countries and A literature review. OECD Education Working Paper No. 65.

Fairman, J., Johnson, A., Mette, I., Wickerd, G. & LaBrie, S. (2018). A Review of Standardized Testing Practices and Perceptions in Maine. Published by the Maine Education Policy Research Institute in the Center for Education Policy.

Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking (3rd ed.). Springer.

Doran, N.J. Moses, T.P. & Eignor, D.R. (2010). Principle and practices of score equating. New Jersey: ETC Princeton.

Davier, A. A. V. (2008). New Results on the Linear Equating Methods for the Non-Equivalent-Groups Design. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33 (2), 186–203. Available at http://jebs.aera.net.

Holland, P. W. & Dorans, N. J. (2006). Linking and equating. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 187-220). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Lord, F.M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. New Jersey: Hillsdale.

Wiberg, M., & van der Linden, W. J. (2011). Local linear observed-score equating. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48, 229-254.

Petersen, N. S., Cook, L. L., & Stocking, M. L. (1983). IRT versus conventional equating methods: A comparative study of scale stability. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 137-156.

Livingston, S. A. (2004). Equating test scores (without IRT). Princeton, NJ: ETS.

Skaggs, G. (2005). The accuracy of random groups equates to very small samples. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 309-330.

Yu, C. H. & Sharon, E. O. P. (2005). Test Equating by Common Items and Common Subjects: Concepts and Applications. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(4). Available online: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=4

Oni, J. A. (2001). Resources and resources utilization as correlates of school academic performance in the secondary pre-vocational education in Ogun State, Nigeria. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Ibadan.

Eze, N. (2002). School-Based assessment as a predictor of students' performance in Junior School Certificate Examination. Nigeria Educational Review, 8 (2), 32-44.

Olutola, A.T. (2011). Analysis of item parameters of senior school certificate multiple choice in biology in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Ilorin, Ilorin.

Olutola, A.T. (2015). Item Difficulty and Discrimination Indices of Multiple Choice Biology Tests. Liceo Journal of Higher Education Research, 11(1), Pp.16-30.

Olatunji, D.S. (2007). Effects of some options on psychometric properties of multiple-choice tests in economics. Unpublished M.Ed Thesis, University of Ilorin, Ilorin.

Alfred, O. (2010). Assessment of the Equivalence of 2009 Senior School Certificate Multiple Choice Economics Test Items in Ilorin, Nigeria. M.Ed Thesis, University of Ilorin. Ilorin.

Okoro, D. U. (2004). Quality in education with particular reference to learning achievement. A paper presented at the National Conference on Education For All. Abuja 20th -23rd August.

Moyinoluwa, T. D. (2015). Analysing the Psychometric Properties of Mathematics in Public Examinations in Nigeria. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. 5 (7), 24-30

Bandele, S. O., & Adewale, A. E. (2013). Comparative analysis of the item difficulty levels of WAEC, NECO, and NABTEB Mathematics achievement examinations. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 761-765.

Aborisade, O. J. & Fajobi , O. O. (2020). Comparative analysis of psychometric properties of mathematics items constructed by WAEC and NECO in Nigeria using item response theory approach. Educational Research and Reviews. 15 (1), 1-7

Steve FN, Fadipe RA, Kayode OC. Causes and Consequences of Truancy Among in School Adolescents in Oyo North Senatorial District Nigeria. SPEKTA (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat: Teknologi dan Aplikasi). 2022 Jun 14;3(1):23-30.

Kolawole, E. B. (2007). A comparative analysis of psychometric properties of two Nigerian examining bodies for senior secondary schools mathematics. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(8): 913-915.

Adeniran, T. (2000). NECO certificate is valid for varsity admission. An Article Published in the Punch Newspaper of Tuesday, 29th February 2000.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-14

How to Cite

Daramola, D. S., Olutola, A. T., & Jimoh, M. I. (2022). Analysis of Linear Equating of Senior School Certificate Multiple-Choice Examination Papers in Economics. SPEKTA (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat : Teknologi Dan Aplikasi), 3(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.12928/spekta.v3i2.4447

Issue

Section

Applied Technology