The Representation of Reunion 212 in Indonesian Online Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v1i2.993Keywords:
Critical discourse analysis, Reunion 212, MediaAbstract
Reunion 212 which is the action of a series of previous actions was reported by many media in Indonesia. Each media portrays the action differently. This critical discourse analysis attempts to uncover the practice of power in Indonesian online media regarding the rally. Three reunion 212-related articles published on December 2, 2017 from each of CNN Indonesia.com and Republika Online were collected as the data of the study. Those online media were chosen as preliminary study informs that they frequently take different point of view whey they are reporting moslem or islamic related issues. The data collected were analyzed using van Dijk discourse analysis approach which consisted of text analysis, social cognition, and social context. The findings confirm that CNN Indonesia.com is more concerned about the adverse effects of the action and the purpose of the action which is considered politically charged, while Republika Online brings more humanist themes eventhough it also does not deny the potential political purpose behind the action. The themes are supported by certain lexical and discourse strategies such as word choice, theme choice, cohesion, and coherence. Moreover, the power practice is more visible in CNN Indonesia.com which attempts to convince readers that the action is bad and orientates itself more toward political purposes. While the news from Republika Online is more informative and only contains the positive side of the action.
References
Fairclough, N. 1995. Media Discourse. Great Britain: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Sosial Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
https://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/umum/16/12/04/oho06r257-jumlah-peserta-aksi-212-mencapai-75-juta-orang retrieved on October 11 2019.
https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20150213150907-106-31950/pengamat-media-barat-malas-mengenal-islam retrieved on October 11 2019.
Wodak, R. 2002. “Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis,” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik, 36(10), pp.5-31.
Van Dijk, T.A. 1993. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis,” Discourse and Society.
Fairclough, N. 1992. Language and Power. Fouth impression. London: Longman.
Eriyanto, 2009. Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Cetakan VII. Yogyakarta: CLiS.
Warsono. 2008. “A critical Discourse Analysis to Unmask the Ideological Stance behind ‘Al- Qaeda inthe Asia Pacific: Origin, Capability, and Threat’,” Humaniora, 20(2): 191-199.
Lemmouh. Z. (2008). A Critical Linguistic analysis of the representation of Muslims in The New York Times. Journal of Language and Communication Studies, (40): 217-240.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., dan McEnery, T. 2012. "Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations Around the Word ‘Muslim’ in the British Press 1998–2009”. Oxford University Press, 34(3): 255–278.
Poorebrahim, F., dan Zarei, G. H. 2013. How is Islam Portrayed in Western Media? A Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective. Unpublished.
Tahir. M. 2013. “A Critical Discourse Analysis of Religious Othering of Muslims in the Washington Post,” Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 14 (6): 744-753.
Rachimawati. 2012. How is Islam Portrayed in Western Media? A Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective, unpublished. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Perdana, A., Karlinah, S., and Yudhapramesti, P. 2012. “Pemberitaan Front Pembela Islam dalam Majalah Berita Mingguan Tempo,” E-Jurnal Mahasiswa Universitas Padjajaran, 1(1): 1-20.
Artha, D. A. 2013. “Representasi Tekstual Aksi Ormas FPI dalam Pemberitaan di Majalah Detik Edisi Oktober 2014,” Unpublished. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Wibowo, D. 2014. “Representasi Tekstual Aksi Ormas FPI dalam Pemberitaan di Majalah Detik Edisi Oktober 2014,” unpublished. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Karman. 2017. “Kontestasi Frame Surat Kabar Nasional dalam Liputan ‘Aksi Bela Islam’.” Jurnal Pekommas, 2(1): 87-98.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Nizar Ibnus

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
By publishing your research with NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, you agree to a collaborative and open approach to copyright:
-
You Keep the Rights: You retain full copyright of your manuscript. You simply grant our journal the right of first publication. To maximize the reach of your research, your work will be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This empowers the global community to read and share your work freely, provided they give proper credit to your authorship and acknowledge NOTION as the original publisher.
-
Freedom to Distribute: You are completely free to enter into separate, non-exclusive agreements to distribute the published version of your article. Whether you wish to archive it in your university's institutional repository or include it as a chapter in a future book, you may do so as long as its initial publication in this journal is properly cited.
-
Boost Your Impact: We actively encourage you to share your pre-publication manuscript online such as on your personal website or an academic repository even before or during the submission process. Proactive sharing fosters valuable scholarly discussions and significantly increases the early visibility and citation potential of your work.



