Excavation of the Suspect's Identity by Analysis of the Speaker Profiling Case Evidence of Fake Voice Recordings

Authors

  • Tsurayya Yusra Zahirah Zahra Gadjah Mada University
  • Zhang Wei Guangdong University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v5i2.8038

Keywords:

Forensic Linguistics, Speaker Profiling , Fake Voice , Recording, Lesti , Rizky Billar

Abstract

Technological developments, especially in AI applications, allow someone to commit criminal acts by changing other people's voices. This study implements forensic linguistics by comparing data sources on the audio of Lesti (L) and Rizky Billar (RB) to ensure the originality of the sounds. The Speaker Profiling method with aural-perception analysis is used because there is no valid comparative evidence, so the audio comparison is taken from the L and RB platforms published to the public. This research resulted in two different aspects of each audio: phonetics and acoustics. These two aspects show the two audio sources' differences in pronunciation, emphasis, frequency, and tone. As a result, the vote is identified as a hoax. This research can demonstrate the use of software to help identify individual language profiles; it contributes to the development of applied linguistics, especially as a legal aid tool. Researchers hope that there will be further research from other linguists that will address more benefits of using AI / Corpus technology as a linguistic analysis tool, both with spoken and written data.

References

Ahuja, P., & Vyas, J. M. (2018). Forensic speaker profiling: the study of supra-segmental features of Gujarati dialects for text–independent speaker identification. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 50(2), 152-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2016.1237547

Barraud, B. (2016). La linguistique juridique: La recherche juridique, L’Harmattan. ffhal-01367747

Chaer, A, L. Agustina. (2010). Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Deslauriers-Varin, N. (2020). Introduction : l’enquête policière et les techniques d’enquête : de la pratique à la recherche. Criminologie. 53(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.7202/1074186aradresse copiéeune erreur

Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. John Wiley & Sons.

Hamid, A., & Mboka, I. (2021). Isolect Language Status of Wakatobi Language in the Sikka Islands (A Dialectological Study). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(4), 8397-8407. https://bircu-journal.com/index.php/birci/article/view/2781

Hollien, H., & Schwartz, R. (2000). Aural-perceptual speaker identification: problems with noncontemporary samples. Forensic linguistics, 7, 199-211. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11210926/

Mahsun. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa; Edisi ke-3. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mesthrie, R. (Ed.). (2011). The Cambridge handbook of sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.

Nadar, F. X. (2009). Pragmatik & penelitian pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Satjadibrata, R. (2022). Kamus Sunda-Indonesia. Kiblat Buku Utama.

Schilling, N., & Marsters, A. (2015). Unmasking identity: Speaker profiling for forensic linguistic purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 195-214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000282

Sholihatin, E. (2017). Pencemaran Nama Baik: Kajian Linguistik Forensik. Disertasi Pascaunesa.

Sugiarto, S., & Qurratulaini, R. (2020). Potensi Kriminal Cyber Crime pada Meme: Sebuah Kajian Linguistik Forensik. Deiksis: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(1), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.33603/deiksis.v7i1.2495

Verhaar, J. W. M. (2016). Asas – Asas Linguistik Umum; Cetakan ke-9. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Warami, H. (2014). Legitimasi Kekuasaan dalam UU Otsus Papua: Kajian Wacana Kritis. DisertasiDoktor. https://sukarsa.unud.ac.id/repositori/disertasi?nim=1190171005

Watt, D., & Llamas, C. (2010). The identification of the individual through speech. Language and identities, 76-85. https://pure.york.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/the-identification-of-the-individual-through-speech

Downloads

Published

2023-11-06

How to Cite

Zahra, T. Y. Z., & Wei, Z. (2023). Excavation of the Suspect’s Identity by Analysis of the Speaker Profiling Case Evidence of Fake Voice Recordings. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 5(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v5i2.8038

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Tsurayya Yusra Zahirah Zahra, Zhang Wei

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

By publishing your research with NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, you agree to a collaborative and open approach to copyright:

  • You Keep the Rights: You retain full copyright of your manuscript. You simply grant our journal the right of first publication. To maximize the reach of your research, your work will be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This empowers the global community to read and share your work freely, provided they give proper credit to your authorship and acknowledge NOTION as the original publisher.

  • Freedom to Distribute: You are completely free to enter into separate, non-exclusive agreements to distribute the published version of your article. Whether you wish to archive it in your university's institutional repository or include it as a chapter in a future book, you may do so as long as its initial publication in this journal is properly cited.

  • Boost Your Impact: We actively encourage you to share your pre-publication manuscript online—such as on your personal website or an academic repository—even before or during the submission process. Proactive sharing fosters valuable scholarly discussions and significantly increases the early visibility and citation potential of your work.