Critical discourse analysis of proportional closed election system news (on the online media CNNindonesia.com and News.detik.com)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v5i2.7960Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis , Online News , Proportional Closed , Election SystemAbstract
The background of this research is the discourse on the implementation of a closed proportional system in the 2024 election. The research aims to find out the textual practices of the discourse of the two online media as information tools that can influence readers' opinions of a discourse. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method through a three-dimensional theoretical approach from Fairclough. Analysis of the object of research through three stages of analysis, description, interpretation and explanation. The results of the text analysis show that the two news media have different content. cnnindonesia.com seems to be answering the public's question mark about the reasons for PDIP as the only party that seems confident in supporting a closed proportional election system in the 2024 election. Through this system the chairman of the party absolutely appoints cadres in parliament. Meanwhile, news.detik.com's reporting places more emphasis on the possible impact that will be experienced by the PDIP and its implications for political developments in Indonesia if the system is implemented in the upcoming elections. From the two reports, there is a difference in the focus of representation and the purpose of the news. The conclusion is that the context of the media and the context of the communication situation appear to have a significant effect on determining the meaning of speech in online news media.
References
Anshori, S., & Sumarlam, S. (2018). Critical discourse analysis of online media news about the potential of conflict of presidential election 2019. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 280(Basa 2018), 318–326.
Aqromi, N. L. (2020). An Analysis of metaphor for corona on headlines news. PIONEER, vol. 12(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v12i2.734
Banguis-Bantawig, R. (2019). The role of discourse markers in the speeches of selected Asian presidents. Heliyon, 5(3), e01298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01298
Bouvier, G., & Way, L. C. S. (2021). Revealing the politics in “soft”, everyday uses of social media: The Challenge for critical discourse studies. Social Semiotics, vol. 31(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1930855
Busri, H., & Badrih, M. (2022). Representation of linguistic characteristics in mass media. Kembara: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, vol. 8(1), 1–14. http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/kembara
Chen, B. (2018). Metaphors in English news headlines. 266 (Hssmee), 327–330. https://doi.org/10.2991/hssmee-18.2018.54
CNN, I. (2023, January). Mengapa PDIP ngotot dorong sistem pemilu proporsional tertutup? CNN Indonesia.
Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research design: Pendekatan, metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, campuran. Pustaka Pelajar.
Cutting. (2008). Pragmatics and discourse. London: Rouledge.
Dewi, A. A. M. (2019). Grammatical construction of verb-particle “off” in English. Notion: Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, Vol. 1(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v1i1.710
Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis wacana: Pengantar analisis teks media. LkiS.
Fairclough, N. (1982). The Order of discourse (M. Saphiro, Ed.). Blackwell Publishers.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd Ed). Pearson Education Ltd.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Rouledge.
Febriansyah, G. (2020). Conceptual metaphor of anger emotion in Grunge Musician’s song lyrics. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, vol. 2(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v2i1.1026
Fitria, T. N. (2022). Figurative language in the Broken Wings by Kahlil Gibran: An analysis of language style as stylistic effect. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, Vol. 4(2), 105–117. http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/notion/article/view/5798/3121
Foucault, M. (1982). The Order of discourse (M. Saphiro (ed.)). Blackwell Publishers.
Haryatmoko. (2007). Etika komunikasi. Kanisius.
Himelboim, I., & Limor, Y. (2008). Media perception of freedom of the press: A comparative international analysis of 242 codes of ethics. Journalism, vol. 9(3), 235–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884907089007
Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2007/761/index_html
Hoed, H. B. (2011). Semiotik dan dinamika sosial budaya (kedua). Komunitas Bambu.
Ibnus, N. (2019). The Representation of reunion 212 in Indonesian online media. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, vol. 1(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v1i2.993
Kashif, F., Farooqi, R., Tariq, S., Nusrat, A., Ashraf, F., & Raees, A. (2022). A transitivity analysis of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump’s third presidential debate. Heliyon, vol. 8(9), e10518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10518
KhosraviNik, M. (2020). Social media and terrorism discourse: The Islamic State’s (IS) social media discursive content and practices. Critical Discourse Studies.
Luke, J. Y., Widyastuti Surtikanti, M., & Sumarlam, S. (2021). “Itu Sebuah Skandal”: lexical and sociocultural interpretation in critical discourse analysis of Fadli Zon’s tweet. Humaniora, 12(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v12i1.6907
Mardikantoro, H. B., Baehaqie, I., & Badrus Siroj, M. (2022). Construction of women in media: A critical discourse analysis on violence against women in newspaper. Cogent Arts and Humanities, vol. 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2146927
Montejo, G. M., & Adriano, T. Q. (2018). A critical discourse analysis of headlines in online news portals. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 4(2), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-4.2.2
Newsdetik. (2023). Proporsional Tertutup Bisa Jadi Bumerang bagi PDIP. News.Detik.Comdeti.Com. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-6510083/proporsional-tertutup-bisa-jadi-bumerang-bagi-pdip
Nikolopoulou, A. (2021). The Meaning of work in ‘Crisis-Ridden’ Greece. A bottom-up critical discourse analytical perspective. Critical Discourse Studies, vol. 18(4), 445–460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1738250
Park, J. H. (2021). Discourse construction of inter-Korean summits in South Korean newspapers: A diachronic study. Language and Communication, vol. 7(8), 19–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.02.001
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications inc.
Risdaneva, R. (2018). A critical discourse analysis of women’s portrayal in news reporting of sexual violence. Studies in English Language and Education, vol. 5(1), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v5i1.9433
Saffanah, G. A. (2021). The online media representation of bullying issue: a case of Audrey, vol. 9(2), 56–63. http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/63847
Saputra, A. (2023, January). Akademisi UII: Pemilu proporsional terbuka lebih “memuliakan” daulat rakyat. DetikNews.
Sari, D. R. (2019). Discourse Analysis on Online Media. 377(Icaess), 267–270. https://doi.org/10.2991/icaess-19.2019.50
Sunarso, S., Setiawan, B., & Anjani, N. P. P. S. (2022). The political satire of Mojok.co in the 2019 Indonesian election. Heliyon, vol. 8(7), e10018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10018
van Dijk, T. . (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. . (2009a). Society and discourse: how social context influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. . (2009b). Society and Discourse: How Social Context Influence Text and talk. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Prapti Wigati Purwaningrum; Danang Dwi Harmoko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their articles in NOTION: journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
