Slivers of Hope: Women in Dystopian Trilogy

Authors

  • Josephine May Grace Aclan Famoso Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v3i2.4809

Keywords:

Dystopia, Feminism, Hope, Revolution

Abstract

This paper explores the struggles, goals, and motivations of the women characters in The Hunger Games Trilogy. In detail, the study employs Elaine Showalter’s Feminist theory to reveal the women characters’ categories in terms of three stages: feminine, feminist and female. In the study, some of the women characters living in the dehumanized society of Panem have attained the last stage of feminism which is the female stage. However, other women characters are not able to fulfill their goals. Still, due to the women characters’ demand to change the system, they start an uprising. For example, the main character, Katniss Everdeen, contributes to the collapse of the ruling government in power as she accepts being the Mockingjay, the symbol of revolution. Another woman character to exemplify such a noble act is Johanna Mason who becomes part of the rebellion and survives the war against the unjust ruling of the Capitol. These women characters are slivers of light amidst the chaos. In conclusion, it is discovered that women characters play pivotal roles in society. This suggests that women characters recognize their power to accelerate societal advancement. For this dystopian trilogy, in particular, women become symbols of hope.

References

Beltran, M. (2021, April 26). How a Community Pantry Sparked Movement of Mutual Aid in the Philippines. The News Lens International Edition. https://international.thenewslens.com/article/149976

Bernardo, A. B. (2010). Extending hope theory: Internal and external locus of trait hope. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 944–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.036

Coleman, R., & Ferreday, D. (2010). Introduction: Hope and Feminist Theory. Journal for Cultural Research, 14(4), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797581003765283

Collins, S. (2008). The Hunger Games (Book 1) (Reprint ed.). Scholastic Press.

Collins, S. (2009). Catching Fire (Hunger Games2) (Reprint ed.). Scholastic Press.

Collins, S. (2010). Mockingjay (Hunger Games) (1st ed.). Scholastic Press.

Ertsgaard, G. (2021). Peeta’s Virtue in the Hunger Games Trilogy. Journal of Feminist Scholarship, 18(18). https://doi.org/10.23860/jfs.2021.18.07

Hansen, K. S. (2015). The Metamorphosis of Katniss Everdeen: The Hunger Games, Myth, and Femininity. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 40(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1353/chq.2015.0020

Kang jun-young, et al. (2017). The De-Chinization Policy of Tsai Ing-wen and Influence on Cross-Straight Relations. (54), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.35221/tamla.2017..54.013

Klapisch, C. (1995). Feminine identity and mass consumption: A semiotic analysis of feminine products packaging. Semiotica, 104(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1995.104.1-2.99

Kolb, D. (2021). Adaptive leadership: The case of Jacinda Ardern and New Zealand. Academia Letters, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.20935/al557

Hawthorne, N. (1992). Scarlet Letter (Wordsworth Classics) (Reprint ed.). Wordsworth Editions Ltd.

Nehere, K. (2016). The Feminist Views: A Review. Feminist Research, 1(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.21523/gcj2.16010101

Oliver, K. (2014). Ambiguity, Ambivalence and Extravagance in The Hunger Games. Humanities, 3(4), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.3390/h3040675

Rigaud, S. (2013). https://www.app.pan.pl/article/item/app20120056.html. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. Published. https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2012.0056

Showalter, E. (1999). Elaine Showalter. The Lancet, 354(9176), 438. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)75868-2

Simmons, A. M. (2012). Class on Fire: Using the Hunger Games Trilogy to Encourage Social Action. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.00099

Smith, N. (2005). Hope and Critical Theory. Critical Horizons, 6(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851605775009528

Thaler, M. (2017). Hope Abjuring Hope: On the Place of Utopia in Realist Political Theory. Political Theory, 46(5), 671–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591717740324

notion journal of linguistics literature and culture

Downloads

Published

2021-11-23

How to Cite

Famoso, J. M. G. A. (2021). Slivers of Hope: Women in Dystopian Trilogy. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 3(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v3i2.4809

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Josephine May Grace Aclan Famoso

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

By publishing your research with NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, you agree to a collaborative and open approach to copyright:

  • You Keep the Rights: You retain full copyright of your manuscript. You simply grant our journal the right of first publication. To maximize the reach of your research, your work will be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This empowers the global community to read and share your work freely, provided they give proper credit to your authorship and acknowledge NOTION as the original publisher.

  • Freedom to Distribute: You are completely free to enter into separate, non-exclusive agreements to distribute the published version of your article. Whether you wish to archive it in your university's institutional repository or include it as a chapter in a future book, you may do so as long as its initial publication in this journal is properly cited.

  • Boost Your Impact: We actively encourage you to share your pre-publication manuscript online such as on your personal website or an academic repository even before or during the submission process. Proactive sharing fosters valuable scholarly discussions and significantly increases the early visibility and citation potential of your work.