Intertextuality as semiotic mediation for youth’s enactment of agency and identity in everyday digital literacy practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v5i3.7650Keywords:
digital literacy practice, intertextuality, agency, identityAbstract
The purpose of this research is to investigate the practice of intertextuality of Farah (pseudonym) a 20-year-old female university student who engaged in a variety of culturally shaped digital literacy practices. In particular, it seeks to elucidate how Farah’s practice of intertextuality serves as a semiotic mediation for her exercise and enactment of agency and identity during her everyday literacy practice on Instagram. This research was framed as a case study design with a connective ethnography approach specifically suited to the online environment and digital communication where the researcher’s physical presence as an observer is no longer required. Data were collected by means of digital media and technology such as WhatsApp Message Service, informal phone interviews, and online observation. The collected data comprised online snapshots of quote bots, pictures, drawings and comments that Farah produced and shared as part of her everyday digital literacy practice. The data analysis entailed examination of Farah’s practice of intertextuality through the lens of sociocultural perspective on text production and interpretation. The findings revealed that Farah’s use of quote bots and doodles posted on Instagram involved the act of borrowing texts from other sources as well as mixing English with Indonesian language. Farah’s practice of intertextuality was pre-mediated, calculated and purposeful, allowing her to engage in digital authorship involving creativity, improvisation and consciousness as ingredients of agency. In the same vein, Farah’s practice of intertextuality allowed her to author the self as a contemplative religious individual. The research concluded with an appeal to policy makers and educational practitioners to respond to the learners’ changing learning landscape by re-defining the way we view learners/students, from merely a recipient of knowledge to an individual who has agency, identity and funds of knowledge that have to be acknowledged and appreciated in any process of curriculum design and its implementation on a daily basis.
References
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics (Emerson, C., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres and the problem of text in linguistics, philology, and the human sciences: An experiment in philosophical analysis. In C. Emerson, C. and M. Holquist (Eds.), Bakhtin: Speech genres and Other Late Essays. Translated by V. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community: London: Routledge.
Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanič, R. (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
Bauerline, M. (2008). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future (or don’t trust anyone under 30). New York: Penguin.
Bazerman, C. (2010) Intertextualities: Volosinov, Bakhtin, literary theory, and literacy studies. In A. F. Ball and S. W. Freedman (Eds.). Bakhtinian Perspective on Language, Literacy, and Learning. (pp. 53 65). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755002.003
Buckingham, D. & Willet, R. (Eds.). (2006). Digital Generations: Children, Young People and New Media. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cazden, C. B. (2000). Taking cultural differences into account. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 249-266). London: Routledge.
Emerson, C. & Holquist, M (1986) Bakhtin: Speech genres and Other Late Essays (Eds.) Translated by V. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Text: Linguisic and Intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 3(2), 193 – 217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (1sted.). New York: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595
Gee, J.P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideologies in discourses (3rd ed.). NY: Routledge Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C, & Leu, D. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Heath, S. B. (1982). Ethnography in education: Defining the essentials. In P.Gillmore & A.Glatthorn (Eds.). Children in and out of school: Ethnography & education (pp. 33- 55). Washington DC: The Center for Applied Linguistics.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841057
Heath, S. B., & Street, B. V. (2008). Ethnography: approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Holquist, M. (1990). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203330340
Hull, G. & Schultz, K. (2002). Negotiating boundaries between school and non-school literacies. In G. Hull and K. Schultz (Eds.), Schools Out! Bridging Outof- School Literacies with Classroom Practice (pp. 1 – 10). New York: Teachers College Press.
Ito, M. Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., et al., (2010). Hanging Out, Messing Arround, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. Boston: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8402.001.0001
Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, Literacy, Learning: A multimodal Approach. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.
Kristeva, J. (1986). The Kristeva Reader. In T. Moi (Ed.). The Kristeva Reader.Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Kress, G. and T. van Leeuwen (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
Lam, W. S. E. (2009). Multiliteracies on instant messaging in negotiating local, translocal, and transnational Affiliations: A case of an adolescent Immigrant. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.4.5
Leander, K. (2008). Toward connective ethnography of online/offline literacy network. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, and D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 33 – 65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66 (1), 60-92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Souza-Lima, E. and Emihovich, C. (eds.) (1995). Vygotsky’s cultural historical theory of human development: An International perspective. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, theme issue. 26(4). https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1995.26.4.05x1059s
Top 20 countries with the highest number of Internet users. (2018, January 15). Retrieved from https://www.internetworldstats.com/top20.htm.
Vygotsky, L. (1974). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Watson-Gegeo, K.A. (1988). Ethnography in ESL: Defining the Essentials. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 575-592. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587257
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 ahmad budairi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
