Teachers’ knowledge: Teachers’ perceptions and their sources of knowledge in vocabulary instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v5i3.6879Keywords:
Perceptions, Sources of knowledge, Teachers’ knowledge, Vocabulary instructionAbstract
The study investigated EFL teachers’ perceptions and their sources of knowledge in vocabulary instruction at the secondary school level in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. To fulfill this purpose, an explanatory research design and mixed data analysis methods were employed. The study involved thirty-six English teachers from three representative secondary schools. Data was collected from the participant teachers through a questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. The findings show that participants in the study generally have positive perceptions about vocabulary teaching and learning. According to the participants’ perspectives, vocabulary is central to language and it is important to language learners in their language learning. This thought was affirmed by participants in both quantitative and qualitative aspects of the study. The finding also revealed teachers’ sources of knowledge in vocabulary instruction. These knowledge sources include teachers’ teaching experience, their disciplinary background, apprenticeship of observation, and others. The discussion of these findings suggests implications for practices and recommendations for future research to improve vocabulary instruction in secondary schools.
References
Arıoğul, S. (2007). Understanding foreign language teachers' practical knowledge: Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 3(1). 168-181.
Borg, M. (2004). The apprenticeship of observation. ELT Journal, 58(3), 274-276. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.3.274
Borg, S. (1999). Teachers’ theories in grammar teaching. ELT Journal, 53(3), 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1093/eltj/53.3.157
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 35, 81-109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903
Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied linguistics, 30(3), 358-388. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp007
Carter, K. (1990). Teachers' knowledge and learning to teach. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 291-310). New York:
Chacón-Beltrán, Ruben, Christián Abello-Contesse & Maria del Mar Torreblanca-López (eds.). 2010. Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning. Bristol. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692900
Creswell, W. J., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Buffalo & Otranto: Multilingual Matters.
Freeman, D. (2002). The hidden side of the work: Teacher knowledge and learning to teach. A perspective from North American educational research on teacher education in English language teaching. Language teaching, 35(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444801001720
Gao, Q. (2007). Grammar teaching from the perspective of teacher cognition: A survey of Chinese EFL teachers to non-English major undergraduates. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Gass, S. (1999). Incidental vocabulary learning: Discussion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21 (3), 19-333. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199002090
Grangeat, M. (2008). Complexity of teachers' knowledge: A synthesis between personal goals, collective culture and conceptual knowledge. Paper presented at the Network 10-Teacher Education European Conference on Educational Research. Gothenburg.
Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward.
McCarthy, M. J. (1990) Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Beijaard, D. (1999). Exploring language teachers’ practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. Teaching and teacher education, 15(1), 59-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00045-6
Morse, J, M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multi method research design. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, pp189-208.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Prabhu, N. (1990). There is no best method--Why? TESOL Quarterly, 24 (2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586897
Richards, J. and T. Rodgers. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge: CUP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
Shulman. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Swan, M. (1985). A Critical look at the Communicative Approach (2), Oxford Journals Humanities ELT Journal Volume39, Issue 2. 76-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/39.2.76
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Tsui, A. B. M. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of ESL teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524698
Van Driel, J.H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001): the role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 38(2). 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2%3C137::AID-TEA1001%3E3.0.CO;2-U
Zhang Jianmin. (2003). A Bird in the Hand: Some Thoughts on Vocabulary Acquisition by Chinese Learners. Teaching English in China, Vol.26 No.2, June.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bekele Daba Shube, Dr. Alemu Hailu Hanshu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
