Traces of Linguistic Imperialism Enacted through Discursive Strategies in ELT Textbooks in Indonesia

Authors

  • Ahmad Budairi Monash University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v1i2.581

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, power relations, discursive strategies, power in discourse

Abstract

Although in many educational contexts textbooks serve as the backbone of teaching, providing practical guides for teachers as well as useful references for learning progress, they could also serve as a site of struggle for many competing discourses. ELT textbooks bear particular relevance here, as they place English at the center of prominence while serving as a medium for knowledge transmission. This paper reports on part of the findings of a case study examining the exercise of dominant discourses in two ELT textbooks for high school in Indonesia. The analysis revealed that there are imbalanced power relations—enacted through such discursive strategies as foregrounding,, backgrounding and framing in two areas: topics and visuals. These strategies were understood as part of the author’s attempt to preserve the hegemonic status of English and its associated dominant ideology in ways that reflect traces of linguistic imperialism. With regard to the pedagogical value of the textbooks, this paper offers some suggestions on how the textbooks could be more engaging and culturally sensitive towards learners’ socio cultural context. The discussion concludes with an appeal for more balanced representation between the discourse of the third world and that of Britain in ELT textbooks in Indonesia.

References

Apple, M.W. (1992). The text and cultural politics, Educational Researcher, 21, pp. 4-19.

Allwright, R. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELTJ, 36(1), pp. 5-18.

Bao, D. (2016). Improvement in today’s ELT materials development. In Azarnoosh, M, Zeraatpishe, M, Faravani, A, &Kargozari, H.R (Eds) Issues in material development.pp.193-205. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Bao, D. (2006). Developing materials for local markets: Issues and considerations. In J. Mukundan (ed.) Readings on materials IIpp.52-76. Selangor: Pearson Longman.

Edge, J. & Wharton, S. (1998). Autonomy and development: living in the materials world. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching. pp. 295-310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman

Freeman, D. (2014) Reading comprehension questions: The distribution of different types in global
EFL textbooks. In English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption,production.
pp.72-110. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

Huckin, T.N. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Miller (Ed.) Functional approaches to written
texts: classroom applications.pp.78-92. Washington, D.C.: United States Information Agency.

Luke. A. (1988). Literacy, Textbooks and Ideology: postwar literacy instruction and the mythology of
Dick and Jane. Cambridge: PolityPress
McGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
Pennycook, A. (1994). The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. Essex:
Longman

Street, B. (Ed.) (1993). Cross cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press

Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials.ELTJ, 42(4), pp. 237-46
Tomlinson, B., Dat, B., Masuhara, H. and Rubdy, R. (2001). EFL courses for adults. ELT Journal,55(1), pp. 801-101.
Tomlinson, B. (2008). English language learning materials: A critical review. London, UK: Continuum.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: CUP.

vanDijk, T.A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D.Tannen, D. Schiffrin& H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. pp. 352-371. Oxford: Blackwell
Williams, R. (1989). Hegemony and the selective tradition. In S.C. De Castell, A. Luke & C. Luke (Eds) Language, authority and criticism: readings on the school textbooks. pp. 56-60. London: Falmer Press

Downloads

Published

2019-05-20

How to Cite

Budairi, A. (2019). Traces of Linguistic Imperialism Enacted through Discursive Strategies in ELT Textbooks in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 1(2), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v1i2.581

Issue

Section

Articles