Traces of Linguistic Imperialism Enacted through Discursive Strategies in ELT Textbooks in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v1i2.581Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, power relations, discursive strategies, power in discourseAbstract
Although in many educational contexts textbooks serve as the backbone of teaching, providing practical guides for teachers as well as useful references for learning progress, they could also serve as a site of struggle for many competing discourses. ELT textbooks bear particular relevance here, as they place English at the center of prominence while serving as a medium for knowledge transmission. This paper reports on part of the findings of a case study examining the exercise of dominant discourses in two ELT textbooks for high school in Indonesia. The analysis revealed that there are imbalanced power relations—enacted through such discursive strategies as foregrounding,, backgrounding and framing in two areas: topics and visuals. These strategies were understood as part of the author’s attempt to preserve the hegemonic status of English and its associated dominant ideology in ways that reflect traces of linguistic imperialism. With regard to the pedagogical value of the textbooks, this paper offers some suggestions on how the textbooks could be more engaging and culturally sensitive towards learners’ socio cultural context. The discussion concludes with an appeal for more balanced representation between the discourse of the third world and that of Britain in ELT textbooks in Indonesia.
References
Allwright, R. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELTJ, 36(1), pp. 5-18.
Bao, D. (2016). Improvement in today’s ELT materials development. In Azarnoosh, M, Zeraatpishe, M, Faravani, A, &Kargozari, H.R (Eds) Issues in material development.pp.193-205. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Bao, D. (2006). Developing materials for local markets: Issues and considerations. In J. Mukundan (ed.) Readings on materials IIpp.52-76. Selangor: Pearson Longman.
Edge, J. & Wharton, S. (1998). Autonomy and development: living in the materials world. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching. pp. 295-310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman
Freeman, D. (2014) Reading comprehension questions: The distribution of different types in global
EFL textbooks. In English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption,production.
pp.72-110. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Huckin, T.N. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Miller (Ed.) Functional approaches to written
texts: classroom applications.pp.78-92. Washington, D.C.: United States Information Agency.
Luke. A. (1988). Literacy, Textbooks and Ideology: postwar literacy instruction and the mythology of
Dick and Jane. Cambridge: PolityPress
McGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
Pennycook, A. (1994). The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. Essex:
Longman
Street, B. (Ed.) (1993). Cross cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press
Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials.ELTJ, 42(4), pp. 237-46
Tomlinson, B., Dat, B., Masuhara, H. and Rubdy, R. (2001). EFL courses for adults. ELT Journal,55(1), pp. 801-101.
Tomlinson, B. (2008). English language learning materials: A critical review. London, UK: Continuum.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: CUP.
vanDijk, T.A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D.Tannen, D. Schiffrin& H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. pp. 352-371. Oxford: Blackwell
Williams, R. (1989). Hegemony and the selective tradition. In S.C. De Castell, A. Luke & C. Luke (Eds) Language, authority and criticism: readings on the school textbooks. pp. 56-60. London: Falmer Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
