Optimizing the virtual classroom: A case of intensive English course in the Next Normal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v4i3.4932Keywords:
instructional design, intensive English course, online learning, technology-integrated teaching, the next normalAbstract
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, online learning has automatically become a normal practice of the “Next Normal”. Intensive English is a compact three-week course offered to get first-year students ready for university study. Online learning was something new for both students and instructors. A key challenge in online learning was how to make virtual classroom as lively and interactive as possible. The aim of this study was thus to design an instructional program which integrated various technological tools and applications to optimize the virtual classroom. The 63 first-year students from two intact sections of Intensive English were used as participants of the study. A technology acceptance model (TAM) questionnaire (Davis, 1989; Hernandez, 2021) was adapted to assess the effectiveness of the instructional program. The results of the study revealed that all of the participants achieved the overall objective of the course and the target CEFR’s A2 level. They found their online learning experience rewarding. They were satisfied with this online learning experience and were willing to participate in similar online learning in the future. Additionally, recommendations for further research were discussed.
References
Ahshan, R. (2021). A framework of implementing strategies for active student engagement in remote/online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(9). https://doi:10.3390/educsci11090483
Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring students’ use of Zoom application in language course based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(4), 883-900. https://doi:10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1
Aljaafreh, A., Alabadleh, A., Alja’Afreh, S., Alaqtash, M., & Abukhait, J. (2021, June). A questionnaire study on the practice of teaching strategies and technology tools in Jordanian engineering teaching. In 2021 International e-Engineering Education Services Conference (e-Engineering) (pp. 43-48). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/e-engineering47629.2021.9470542
Azimi, S., & Fazelian, P. (2013). New trends and approaches in instructional design and technology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 525-528. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.303
Bajracharya, J. R. (2019). Instructional design and models: ASSURE and Kemp. Journal of Education and Research, 9(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v9i2.30459
Baldwin, S. J., & Ching, Y. H. (2020). Guidelines for designing online courses for mobile devices. TechTrends, 64(3), 413-422.
Boonmoh, A., Jumpakate, T., & Karpklon, S. (2021). Teachers' perceptions and experience in using technology for the classroom. Call-Ej, 22(1), 1-24.
Chaiyo, Y., & Nokham, R. (2017). The effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google Forms on the student’s perception in the classrooms response system. 2017 International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT); ISBN 9781509052103. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdamt.2017.7904957
Cranfield, D., Tick, A., Venter, I. M., Blignaut, R. J., & Renaud, K. (2021). Higher education students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19—A comparative study. Education Sciences, 11(8), 403. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080403
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dellos, R. (2015). Kahoot! A digital game resource for learning. International Journal of Instructional technology and distance learning, 12(4), 49-52
DeWitt, D., Alias, N., Ibrahim, Z., Shing, N. K., & Rashid, S. M. M. (2015). Design of a learning module for the deaf in a higher education institution using Padlet. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 220–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.464
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D. (1989). Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction. Macmillan.
Hernandez, R. M. (2021). Employing Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): An analysis on students’ reception on online learning platforms during covid-19 pandemic. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control & Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS), Automatic Control & Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS), 2021 IEEE International Conference On, 58–63. https://doi-org.proxy.library.mfu.ac.th/10.1109/I2CACIS52118.2021.9495865
Hwang, W.-Y., Shih, T. K., Ma, Z.-H., Shadiev, R., & Chen, S.-Y. (2016). Evaluating listening and speaking skills in a mobile game-based learning environment with situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 4, 639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016438
Icard, S. B. (2014). Educational technology best practices. International Journal of instructional technology and distance learning, 11(3), 37-41.
Ito, M., Arum, R., Conley, D., Gutiérrez, K., Kirshner, B., Livingstone, S., ... & Watkins, S. C. (2020). The connected learning research network: Reflections on a decade of engaged scholarship. Connected Learning Alliance: Irvine, CA, USA.
Johnson, M., Riel, R., Germain-Froese, B., Canadian Teachers’ Federation, & MediaSmarts (Canada). (2016). Connected to learn: Teachers’ experiences with networked technologies in the classroom. Canadian Teachers’ Federation.
Jusas, V., Butkiene, R., Venčkauskas, A., Burbaite, R., Gudoniene, D., Grigaliūnas, Š., & Andone, D. (2021). Models for administration to ensure the successful transition to distance learning during the pandemic. Sustainability, 13(9), 4751. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13094751
Kannan, J., & Munday, P. (2018). New trends in second language learning and teaching through the lens of ICT, networked learning, and artificial intelligence. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a La Comunicación; Vol. 76 (2018): Vías de Transformación En La Enseñanza de Lenguas Con Mediación Tecnológica. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.62495
Karakis, H., Karamete, A., & Okcu, A. (2016). The effects of a computer-assisted teaching material, designed according to the ASSURE instructional design and the ARCS Model of motivation, on students' achievement levels in a Mathematics lesson and their resulting attitudes. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1), 105-113.
Khamprem, K., & Boonmoh, A. (2019). Teachers’ stated needs and their actual use of technology. Human Behavior Development & Society, 20(4), 41–51.
Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Rethinking classroom-oriented instructional development models to mediate instructional planning in technology-enhanced learning environments. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2002-2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.05.004
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons.
Nurpandi, F., Langi, A. Z., & Bandung, Y. (2013, November). Using instructional design model to implement open lesson with lesson study approach for online teacher community. In 2013 Joint International Conference on Rural Information & Communication Technology and Electric-Vehicle Technology (rICT & ICeV-T) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Putri, N. S. (2019). Kahoot application in English Language Teaching (ELT) Context: An Alternative Learning Strategy. Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies; 11-15 ; 2684-9224 ; 2684-7620 ; 10.31849/Elsya.V1i1. http://dx.doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v1i1.2488
Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2015). Affect and willingness to communicate in digital game-based learning. ReCALL, 27(1), 38-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000226
Rojabi, A. R. (2020). Exploring EFL students' perception of online learning via Microsoft Teams: University level in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 163-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2349
Sanga, M. W. (2019). Doing Instruction design for distance education: An analysis of design and technological issues in online course management. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 20(1), 35-54.
Sevy-Biloon, J. (2021). Virtual or face to face classes: Ecuadorian university students' perceptions during the pandemic. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 4(1), 15-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v4i1.3935
Sezer, B., Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2013). Integrating technology into classroom: The learner-centered instructional design. Online Submission, 4(4), 134–144.
Valeeva, R., & Kalimullin, A. (2021). Adapting or Changing: The COVID-19 Pandemic and teacher Education in Russia. Education Sciences, 11(8), 408. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080408
Wang, H., Liu, H., Lu, Z., & Zheng, C. (2020). Exploring English language learners' conceptions of and engagement in a virtual reality learning environment. In H.J. So et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Weng, F., Yang, R. J., Ho, H. J., & Su, H. M. (2018). A TAM-based study of the attitude towards use intention of multimedia among school teachers. Applied system innovation, 1(3), 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/asi1030036
Wong, S. Y., Tee, W. J., & Jasman, M. A.A. B. (2015). 2D Side-Scrolling Game: Applying Motivation and Digital Game-Based Learning (DGBL) in English learning. Springer Singapore. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-399-6_32
Zain, I. M. (2018). The Collaborative Instructional Design System (CIDS): An Innovative Instructional Design Tool for the 21st Century Learning. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051216
Zhang, J. (2020). The construction of college english online learning community under ADDIE Model. English Language Teaching, 13(7), 46-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n7p46
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Chayaporn Kaoropthai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
