How silence facilitates verbal participation

Authors

  • Nguyen Thanh-My Ho Chi Minh Open University
  • Dat Bao Monash University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i3.3004

Keywords:

silence, talk, learner perception, learning experience

Abstract

The article reports a qualitative-quantitative case study of 239 Vietnamese university students’ perspectives on the effects of their silence on the formulation and quality of their talk. It presents participants’ voices with regards to whether and how their silent thinking influences verbal communication in the English language classroom and discusses the dynamics of productive learning strategies that would benefit the quality of speech. Data from an open-ended questionnaire reveal insights into students’ silent and verbal learning with a focus on the logical relationship between the two modes. Three findings coming out of this project include different nuances of the silent learning behaviour, the frequency of success in producing speech after mental processing practice, and a range of practical strategies that helps turn thoughts into verbal output. The study unpacks the importance of silence as autonomous learning and proposes relevant classroom activities for more rewarding outcomes.

References

Abede, D. T. & Deneke, D. G. (2015). Causes of Students’ Limited Participation in EFL Classroom: Ethiopian Public Universities in Focus. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 74–89.

Bao, D. (2014). Understanding Silence and Reticence: Nonverbal participation in Second Language Acquisition. London & New York: Bloomsbury.

Bosacki, S. L., & Bosacki, S. (2005). The culture of classroom silence (Vol. 31). Peter Lang.

Boniecki, K. A., & Moore, S. (2003). Breaking the silence: Using a token economy to reinforce classroom participation. Teaching of Psychology, 30(3), 224-227.

Bista, K. (2012). Silence in Teaching and Learning: Perspective of a Nepalese Graduate Student. College Teaching, 60(2), 76–82

Canary, D. J., & MacGregor, I. M. (2008). Differences that make a difference in assessing student communication competence. Communication Education, 57(1), 41-63.

Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2004). Classroom participation and discussion effectiveness: Student-generated strategies. Communication Education, 53(1).

De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1991). The nature of inner speech in mental rehearsal of the second language [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Inter American Unviersity.

Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. Academic Press.

Jensen, J. V. (1973). Communicative functions of silence. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 249-257.

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. B. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches.

Kalamaras, G. (1994). Reclaiming the tacit dimension: Symbolic form on the rhetoric of the silence. State University of New York Press.

Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Pergamon Press.

Nguyen, A. T. H. (2002). Cultural Effects on Learning and Teaching English in Vietnam. The Language Teacher. http://www.jalt.publications.org/old_tlt/articles/2002/01/an

Nguyen, H. T. (2002). Vietnam: Cultural Background for ESL/EFL Teachers. The Review of Vietnamese Studies, 2(1), 1–6.

Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 34–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463281003765323

Ollin, R. (2008). Silent pedagogy and rethinking classroom practice: Structuring teaching through silence rather than talk. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(2), 265–280.

Ramirez, M. I. (1989). Pluralistic education: A bicognitive-multilcultural style: Cross ethnic comparisons. Early Child Development and Care, 51, 137–155.

Roberts, D. E. (2010). The Paradox of Silence: Some Questions About Silence as Resistance. Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law, 1318. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1318

Santosa, B., & Mardiana, R. (2018). English Learner’s Perspective on Culture and Silence in an EFL University Classroom. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(8), 18–24.

Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom‐based practices. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 87-101.

Tannen, D. (Ed.). (1993). Gender and conversational interaction. Oxford University Press.

Tran, T. T. (2013). Factors affecting teaching and learning English in Vietnamese universities. The Internet Journal Language, Culture and Society, 38, 138–145.

Weaver, R. R., & Qi, J. (2005). Classroom organization and participation: College students' perceptions. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 570-601.

Wursten, H., & Jacobs, C. (2013). The impact of culture on education. The Hofstede Centre, itm international.

Zembylas, M., & Michaelides, P. (2004). The Sound of Silence in Pedagogy. Educational Theory, 54(2), 193–210.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

Thanh-My, N., & Bao, D. (2020). How silence facilitates verbal participation. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(3), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i3.3004

Issue

Section

Articles