Constructing identity: Experiences of Indonesian ESP teachers in a language institute
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i3.2560Keywords:
ESP teacher, language institute, teacher identityAbstract
This study focuses on examining four Indonesian English for Specific Purposes (ESP) teachers’ experiences regarding their identity construction and negotiation in a language institute. Given the concern on an analytic framework by an adapted model of TESOL teacher identity, the teachers’ experiences were explored through life-history interview. The results revealed a complex process of transforming professional practices and constructing identities in relation to the struggles of becoming ESP teachers. The participants constructed ESP teacher identities through acquiring subject knowledge via professional development activities and building a sense of intrinsic fulfillment in becoming ESP teachers. However, the participants found challenge to cope with the students’ demands of learning ESP. Furthermore, a need to equip the ESP teachers with ESP skills in various subject knowledge areas became the participants’ concern in order to meet the students’ expectancy as well as to enhance their professional development.
References
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Buchanan, R. (2015). Teacher identity and agency in an era of accountability. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 700-719.
Bukor, E. (2015). Exploring teacher identity from a holistic perspective: Reconstructing and reconnecting personal and professional selves. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(3), 305-327.
Campion, G. C. (2016). ‘The learning never ends’: Exploring teachers’ views on the transition from General English to EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 59-70
Chang, K. C. (2017). From EAP to ESP: Teacher’s identity development. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 14(2), 71-100.
Chen, Y. (2014). English for Missionary Purpose: Perspectives from ESP Learners. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 3(8), 81-94.
Cheng, A., & Anthony, L. (2014). ESP research in Asia: Guest editorial. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 1-3.
Clarke, M. (2008). Language teacher identities: Co-constructing discourse and community. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments of English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gao, X. (2008). Teachers’ professional vulnerability and cultural tradition: A Chinese paradox. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 154-165.
Gibbs, G. R. (2008). Analysing qualitative data. London: Sage.
Grosse, C. U., & Voght, G. M. (2012). The continuing evolution of language for specific purposes. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 190-202.
Gu, M., & Benson, P. (2015). The formation of English teacher identities: A cross-cultural investigation. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 187-206.
Hayes, D. (2008). Becoming a teacher of English in Thailand. Language Teaching Research, 12(4), 471-494.
Hoa, N. T. T. H., & Mai, M. P. T. T. (2016). Difficulties in teaching English for specific purposes: Empirical study at Vietnam universities. Higher Education Studies, 6(2), 154-161.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Kubanyiova, M., & Crookes, G. (2016). Re-visioning the roles, tasks, and contribution of language teachers in the multilingual era of language education research and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 117-118.
Layder, D. (1993). New strategies in social research: An introduction and guide. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Olsen, B. (2008). Teaching what they learn, learning what they live: How teachers’ personal histories shape their professional development. Ablingdon: Routledge.
Pennington, M. C. (2014). Teacher identity in TESOL: A frames perspective. In Y. L. Cheung, S. B. Said, & P. Kwanghyun (Eds.), Advances and current trends in language teacher identity research (pp. 16-30). Abington: Routledge.
Poedjiastutie, D. (2017). The pedagogical challenges of English for specific purposes (ESP) teaching at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(6), 338-349.
Sachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity: Learning to be a teacher. In D. M. Pam, & M. Kompf (Eds.), Connecting policy and practice: challenges for teaching and learning in schools and universities (pp. 5-21). New York, London: Routledge.
Song, B., & Kim, T. (2016). Teacher (de)motivation from an Activity Theory perspective: Case of two experienced EFL teachers in South Korea. System, 57, 134-145.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2018). Identity constructions of ESP teachers in a Chinese university. English for Specific Purposes, 49, 1-13.
Toom, A., Pyhältö, K., & Rust, F. O. (2015). Teacher professional agency in contradictory times. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 21(6), 615-623.
Tsui, A. B. (2007). Complexities of identity formation: A narrative inquiry of an EFL teacher. TESOL Quarterly, 41(4), 657-680.
Varghese, M., Morgan, B., Johnston, B., & Johnson, K. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4(1), 21-44.
Whitsed, C., & Volet, S. (2013). Positioning foreign English language teachers in the Japanese university context. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19(6), 717-735.
Xu, Y. (2014). Becoming researchers: A narrative study of Chinese university EFL teachers’ research practice and their professional identity construction. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 242-259.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).