English Scholarly Publishing Activities in the Industrial Revolution 4.0: What, Why, and How?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i1.1890

Keywords:

activities, industrial revolution 4.0, English scholarly publishing, TEAs

Abstract

 

The presence of the Industrial Revolution (IR) 4.0 has inevitably affected the way how scholars proceed to write. Thus, activities intended to yield a piece of scientific writing facilitated by the obtainability and accessibility of internet browsing is called scholarly publishing. Since English has indisputably become the language of international scholarship and research, it is urgent to have the skill in writing scientific articles benefitting the support from IR 4.0 principles. What is going on with academics and what should they do dealing with the IR 4.0 pertinent to their scholarly writing activities, benefits, and drawbacks. This paper discusses what scholarly publishing in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 and how it supports the process of writing articles for publishing. The purposes of this paper are to explain (1). What are scholarly publishing and industrial revolution? (2). Why is it essential for academics? (3) How does writing scholarly publication in Industrial Revolution 4.0 work? Writing the scholarly publication in English has become obligatory for Teacher-Educator Authors (TEAs) and undergraduate students to doctoral students in Indonesia. The study was a descriptive qualitative library to build a conceptual paper for the purpose of a further study. The method was by reviewing any related kinds of literature to provide sufficient arguments for the three research questions. The outcome is several claims, arguments, and evidence gambits for any author to consider. Theoretically, the IR 4.0 principles have significantly eased the flexibility of the process, the quality, and the credibility of research outputs.

Author Biography

Dedi Turmudi, Universitas Negeri Malang

English Department and Associate Professor

References

Afrianto. (2018). Being a professional teacher in the era of industrial revolution 4 . 0 : opportunities , challenges and strategies for innovative classroom practices. English Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 1–13.
Board of Editors TEFLIN Journal. (2012). Writing for international publication : An interview with nugrahenny t.zacharias, Handoyo P. Widodo and Willy A.Renandya. TEFLIN Journal, 23(2), 115–129.
Cheung, Y. L. (2010). First publications in refereed English journals: Difficulties, coping strategies, and recommendations for student training. System, 38(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.012
Choi, H. W., Choi, Y. J., & Kim, S. (2019). Compliance of “ Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing ” in academic society published journals. Scienceediting, 6(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.171
Donovan, S. K. (2018). Reflective practice : 8 stages of publishing a scientific research paper. Publications, 6(1), 1–5. Retrieved from www.mdpi.com/journal/publication
Duszak, A., & Lewkowicz, J. (2008). Publishing academic texts in English: A Polish perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.001
Fazel, I. (2013). Writing for journal publication: an overview of NNES challenges and strategies. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 95–114. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=92595848&site=ehost-live
Flowerdew, J. (1999). Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80125-8
Flowerdew, J. (2015). Some thoughts on English for research publication purposes (ERPP) and related issues. Language Teaching, 48(2), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000523
Gillum, D., & Mendoza, I. A. (2014). What is a publishable article? Applied Biosafety, 19(3), 116–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/153567601401900301
Heigham, J., & Croker, R. A. (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239517
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
Lei, J., & Hu, G. (2019). Doctoral candidates’ dual role as student and expert scholarly writer: An activity theory perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 54, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.12.003
Petrillo, A., Felice, F. De, Cioffi, R., & Zomparelli, F. (2018). Fourth industrial revolution: current practices, challenges, and opportunities in Digital Transformation in Smart Manufacturing. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72304
Rathert, S., & Okan, Z. (2015). Writing for publication as a tool in teacher development. ELT Journal, 69(4), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv029
Ridder, H. G., Miles, M. B., Michael Huberman, A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook. Zeitschrift Fur Personalforschung, 28(4), 485–487.
Roblek, V., Meško, M., & Krapež, A. (2016). A complex view of industry 4.0. SAGE Open, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016653987
Rojko, A. (2017). Industry 4.0 concept: Background and overview. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 11(5), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i5.7072
Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009
Salager-Meyer, F. (2014). Writing and publishing in peripheral scholarly journals: How to enhance the global influence of multilingual scholars? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13(1), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.003
Shehata, A. M. K., & Eldakar, M. A. M. (2018). Publishing research in the international context: An analysis of Egyptian social sciences scholars’ academic writing behaviour. Electronic Library, 36(5), 910–924. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2017-0005
Shirey, M. R. (2013). Building scholarly writing capacity in the doctor of nursing practice program. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(3), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.04.019
Turmudi, D. (2017). Rethinking academic essay writing : Selected genres in comparison. Premise Journal, 6(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v6i2.1052
Turmudi, D. (2019). Diary Gambits : Understanding Writing for Research Publication. (M. F. Yulia, Ed.). Metro, Lampung: CV Laduni AliFatama.
Wilson, R. D., & Creswell, J. W. (1996). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(2), 252. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152153
Wiryawan, K. G. (2014). The current status of science journals in Indonesia. Science Editing, 1(2), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.71
Wiryawan, K. G. (2019). Establishment of the Indonesian association of scientific journal editors. Science Editing, 6(2), 148–150. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.176
Zheng, Y., & Guo, X. (2019). Publishing in and about English: challenges and opportunities of Chinese multilingual scholars’ language practices in academic publishing. Language Policy, 18(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-018-9464-8

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2020-04-29

How to Cite

Turmudi, D. (2020). English Scholarly Publishing Activities in the Industrial Revolution 4.0: What, Why, and How?. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i1.1890

Issue

Section

Articles