A work-based approach for improving students’ performance in the college general English class
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v7i2.11017Keywords:
task-based language teaching, formative assessment, summative assessment, learning performance , general EnglishAbstract
Many university students in Taiwan have complained that the general English class is not very exciting nor useful for the workplace due to its exam-oriented and teacher-centered instruction focus. Such negative impressions often lead to a low motivation toward learning English and affect students’ learning outcomes. This study aimed to establish an innovative work-based teaching approach and to explore whether it can help enhance students’ motivation to learn English, positively impacting their overall performances. The work-based teaching approach included job-seeking activities involving self-introduction and resume writing, as well as product introduction tasks, fostering student participation, teacher-student interaction, and balanced summative-and-formative assessments. The study recruited 129 second-year university students in the general English class for an 18-week course where they were required to complete work-based tasks and assessments. A triangulation of research methods was employed to collect both qualitative and quantitative data from questionnaires, student formative and summative assessment, reflection journals, and student interviews. Three major findings arise from this study: 1) students’ score gain on TOEIC pre- and post-tests was statistically significant; 2) students offered positive views on the diverse, interactive, and communicative teaching methods that enhanced their understanding and application of workplace English; and 3) performance assessment played a more important role in increasing students’ learning interest and motivation than traditional paper-and-pencil tests. This study concludes with some pedagogical implications and suggestions for future research.
References
Job Bank. (2021). 2021 Survey report on foreign language proficiency management of medium and large enterprises and job seekers in Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.toeic.com.tw/info/reports/company-survey/
Alisoy, H. (2024). Task-based teaching, learning, and assessment in ELT: A case study of innovative practices. International Journal of Philosophical Studies and Social Sciences, 3(5), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10075961
Birenbaum, M., DeLuca, C., Earl, L., Heritage, M., Klenowski, V., Looney, A., Smith, K., Timperley, H., Volante, L., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2015). International trends in the implementation of assessment for learning: Implications for policy and practice. Policy Futures in Education, 13(1), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210314566733
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). In praise of educational research: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192032000133721
Chang, C. J. (2017). Squeezing into high-paying companies: Master these three English skills first. Business Today, (1095). Retrieved from https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80407/post/201712130030/
Chang, K. P., Yuan, Y. H., Lin, C. N., & Lee, P.L. (2013). Bridging the gap between learning and application: Developing professional English language competence for technical and vocational college students. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 2(12), 137-143.
Chen, Y., & Li, M. (2015).The perspectives of teachers and commercial circles on exit English examination based on a university of science and technology. Forum of Educational Administration, 7(1), 74–94. Forum of Educational Administration, 7(1), 74-94. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20161017001-201511-
Dolidze T., Abesadze A., Harding B.& Leotta P. (2022). Importance of Integrating Effective Teaching Methods in Business English Classroom. ESI Preprints. https://doi.org/10.19044/esipreprint.9.2022.p237
Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, A., M. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2005). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Western Northern Canadian Protocol.
English Career (2012). The impact of professional English teaching on language instruction. English Career, (30). Retrieved from http://www.geat.org.tw/english-career/30/
Fukuda, S. T., Lander, B. W., & Pope, C. J. (2022). Formative assessment for learning how to learn: Exploring university student learning experiences. RELC Journal, 53(1), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220925927
Gipps, C., & J. Cumming. (2003) Assessing literacies. Paper presented at the International Literacy Conference: Literacy Policies for the Schools We Need, Toronto.
Hanna, G. S., & Dettmer, P. A. (2004). Assessment for effective teaching: Using context-adaptive planning. Boston, MA: Pearson A&B.
Hymes, D.H. (1966). Two types of linguistic relativity. In W. Bright (Ed.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 114–158). The Hague: Mouton.
Ishaq, K., Khan Rana, A. M., & Mat Zin, N. A. (2020). Exploring summative assessment and effects: Primary to higher education. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(3), 23-50.
Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D. R., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: Impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4
Jansson, T., & Löfgren, H. (2022). Balancing diverse purposes in Civics teachers’ assessment decision making. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(3), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2148280
Lai, C. Y. (2005). A study of the needs of ESP (English for specific purposes) courses and the perspectives of ESP instructors for applied English department students in technological universities (Unpublished master’s thesis). Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan City.
Lee, S., & Schmidgall, J. (2020). The importance of English writing skills in the international workplace (Research Memorandum No. RM-20-07). Educational Testing Service.
Liu, T. H., & Liu, F. S. (2022). The challenges and development of diversified technical and vocational education. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 11(5), 01-10. Ming Chi University of Technology.
McMillan, J. H. (2013). SAGE Handbook of research on classroom assessment. Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218649
Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Student-involved assessment for learning. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Tu, Y. T. (2015). Workplace English needs analysis and course design for research and development engineers. Unpublished master's thesis, National Chiayi University, Chiayi.
Wang, S.Y. (2006). Task-based teaching method (Part I) – Enhancing teaching efficiency with task-based approach! Dunhuang English Teaching E-Journal. Retrieved from http://www.cavesbooks.com.tw/CET/ArtContent_en.aspx?CDE=ART20130905175355NQK
Whyte, S. (2019). Revisiting communicative competence in the teaching and assessment of language for specific purposes. Language Education & Assessment, 2(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.29140/lea.v2n1.33
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.
Xie, Q. (2022). Using task-based approach in business English courses for English-majors at a Chinese university. International Journal of Chinese Education, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585X221099104
Zou, W. L., Chen, H. C., Gao, S. M., & Tsai, M. L. (2016). University English education aimed at cultivating global competitiveness: A case study of National Cheng Kung University. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 12(3), 107-130. https://doi.org/10.3966/181665042016091203005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yi-Ching Pan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in ELTEJ agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the ELTEJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ELTEJ. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).