The Content Analysis of Ocean Literacy as the Basis of Blue Curriculum’s Framework in Vocational Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/joves.v7i1.9694Keywords:
Ocean Literacy, blue curriculum, vocational education, systemic literature review, content analysisAbstract
This research aims to analyse the need for Ocean Literacy content indicators to be adapted as the basis of Blue Curriculum's framework in Vocational Education. The Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method was used as the research approach using carefully selected articles from the Sciencedirect database. The selected articles were those published between 2018 and 2023. The PRISMA method was used to filter out documents that did not fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria outlined in this study. After examining and reviewing the selected articles, it was found that there are several indicators that can be put forward in Ocean Literacy content. These are ocean potentials, ocean strategy and management, ocean activities and their impacts on marine ecosystems, ocean-related tourism and culture, ocean sustainable development, and ocean-related policies. This discovery is expected to be integrated into the educational curriculum in vocational education as one of the strategies in managing various marine potentials for sustainable development.
References
Ashley, M., et al. (2019). A change of mind: applying social and behavioral research methods to the assessment of the effectiveness of ocean literacy initiatives. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 288.
Bennett, N.J., et al. (2017). Conservation social science: understanding and integrating human dimensions to improveconservation. Biol. Conserv. 205, 93–108.
Bettencourt, S., et al. (2023). arine litter education: From awareness to action. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 192, 114963Carrera-Rivera, A., et al. (2022). How-to conduct a systematic literature review: A quick guide for computer science research. MethodsX. 9, 101895. www.elsevier.com/mex
Britton, E., et al. (2021). Accelerating sustainable ocean policy: They dynamics of multiple stakeholder priorities and actions for oceans and human health. Marine Policy, 124, 104333
Celine, J. et al. (2023). two way procces – Social capacity as a driver and outcome of equitable marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 149, 105507
Cheng, J., Zhang, X. & Gao Q. (2023). Analysis of the spatio-temporal changes and driving factors of the marine economic–ecological–social coupling coordination: A case study of 11 coastal regions in China. Indicators Ecological, 153, 110392.
Cretella, A., Scherer, C. & Holm, P. (2023). Tasting the ocean: How to increase ocean literacy using seafood heritage with a visceral approach. Marine Policy, 149, 105476.
Delmotte, V. M., et al. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press. Eds, https://www.ipcc.ch /report/ar6/wg1/
Fauville, G., et al. (2019). Development of the international Ocean Literacy survey: measuring knowledge across the world. Environ. Educ. Res. 25, 238–263.
Francolini, E.M., et al. (2023). Stakeholder perspectives on socio-economic challenges and recommendations for better management of the Aliwal Shoal Marine Protected Area in South Africa. Marine Policy, 148, 105470.
Finke, G., et al. (2020) Namibia’s way to Marine Spatial Planning – Using existing practices or instigating its own approach?. Marine Policy, 121, 104107
Frisch,L.C., et al. (2015). Gauging perceptions of ocean acidification in Alaska. Marine Policy, 53, pp.101-110.
F. Cava, et al. (2015). Science content and standards of Ocean Literacy: A Report on Ocean Literacy.
Gutierrez, D., et al. (2023). A proposal for engagement in MPAs in areas beyond national jurisdiction: The case of Macaronesia. Science of the total environment, 854, 158711
Halpern, B.S., et al. (2015). Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean. Nat. Commun. 6, 7615–7617. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8615.
Halpern, B.S., et al. (2019). Recent pace of change in human impact on the world’s ocean. Sci. Rep. 9, 11609–11618. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47201-9.
Jacob, C., et al. (2023). A Two Way Procces – Sosial Capacity as a Driver and Outcome of Equitable Marine Spatial Planning, Marine Policy, 149, 105507.
Jefferson, R.,et al. (2015). Understanding audiences: making public perceptions research matter to marine conservation. Ocean & Coastal Management115, 61–70.
Karantoni, M.E., (2023). Stakeholder views on environmental protection policies in the National Marine Park of Alonissos Northern Sporades, Greece. Sustainable Horizons, 7, 100065.
Kemendikbud. 2017. Management of Vocational Education: Development of a 4-Year Vocational High School (SMK). Jakarta: Centre for Education and Cultural Policy Research.
Kemendikbud (2022). Copy of the Decree of the Head of the Agency for Educational Standards, Curriculum and Assessment, Kemendikbudristek.
Kenny, I., et al. (2023). Aligning social and ecological goals for successful marine restoration. Biological Conversation, 288, 110357
Mahadeo S. (2022). Marine spatial planning in the Eastern Caribbean: Trends and progress. Marine Policy, 145, 105277
Markos, A., Boubonari, T., Mogias, A., Kevrekidis, T., (2017). Measuring ocean literacy in pre-service teachers: psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Survey of Ocean Literacy and Experience (SOLE). Environ. Educ. Res. 23, 231–251.
McKinley, E. et al. (2020). Marine social sciences: Looking towards a sustainable future. Environmental Science and Policy, 108, pp. 85-92
McKinley, E., et al. (2022). Development and Expansion in the Marine Social Sicences: Insight from the Global Community, iScience 25, 104735
Michalowska, M. (2020). Artists in the face of threats of climate change. Oceanologia, 62, pp. 565-575
Mikkelsen, N., et al. (2023). Multiple stakeholders’ perspectives of marine social ecological systems, a case study on the Barents Sea. Ocean and Coastal Management, 242, 106724.
Nash, K.,L., ,et al. (2017). Planetary boundaries for a blue planet. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1625-1634.
Nash, K.,L., et al. (2020). To achieve a sustainable blue future, progress assessments must include interdependencies between the sustainable development goals. One Earth 2, 161–173.
Natali, P. & Thompson, B.S. (2023). Saving two fish with one wreck: Maximizing synergies in marine biodiversity conversation and underwater cultural heritage protection. Marine Policy, 152, 105613
Ocean Literacy Network. (2013). Ocean literacy: Ocean Literacy: the Essential Principles and Fundamental Concepts of Ocean Sciences for Learners of All Ages Version 2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington DC
Omstedt, A. (2023). How to develop an understanding of the marginal sea system by connecting natural and human sciences. Earth System Changes in Marginal Seas/Oceanologia, 65, pp. 20-29.
O'Brien, M., et al. 2023. Fostering Ocean Literacy Through Informal Marine Education Progrms. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 193, 115208.
O’Leary, B.C., et al. (2023). Embracing Nature-based Solutions to promote resilient marine and coastal ecosystems. Nature-Based Solutions 3.
Pace, L.A., et al. (2023). Exploring future research and innovation directions for sustainable blue economy, Marine Policy, 148,105433
Page, M.J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372:n71, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pazoto, C.E., Silva, E.P. & Duarte, M. R. (2022). Ocean literacy in Brazilian school curricula: An opportunity to improve coastal management and address coastal risks?. Ocean and Coastal Management, 219, 106047.
PBES, in: E.S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, H.T. Ngo. (2021). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science- Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany, 2019, p. 1148, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673
Qu, Y., et al. (2023). Dissecting Ocean-Friendly Behavioral Intention Among College Students: Incorporating Ocean Literacy And Diversified Incentive Mechanism With The Theory Of Planned Behavior, Ocean And Coastal Managemen
Santos, T. & Cabral, JA. (2024). Rio de Janeiro’s ocean economy as a key vector for sustainable development in Brazil. Marine Policy, 159, 105876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105876
Schuckmann, K.V., et al. 2020. Ocean science, data, and services for the UN 200 sustainable development goals. Marine Policy, 121, 104154
Stofen-O’Brien, A., et al. (2022). Parachute science through a regional lens: Marine litter research in the Caribbean Small Island Developing States and the challenge of extra-regional research. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 174, 113291
Steel, B.S., et al. (2005). Public ocean literacy in the United States. Ocean Coast Manag. 48, 97–114. Stoll-Kleemann, S., 2019. Feasible options for behavior change toward.
Tsai, L.T., et al. (2023). Ocean literacy among Taiwanese and Japanese high school students. Marine Policy, 150, 105555
UNESCO. (2020). Ocean Literracy Draft Strategic Plan — Ocean Literacy for the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development.
WEF, The Global Risks Report (2022). World Economic Forum, 2022. www.wef. ch/risks22.
Xiaoqing, Z., et al. Spatiotemporal characteristic and evolution of China's marine economic resilience, Ocean &Coastal management, 238, 106562
Zhao, S. & Cheah, K.S.L. (2023). The challenges of Malaysian private universities in reaching sustainable education toward responsible consumption. Cleaner and Resposible Consumption,10, 100130, ISSN 2666-7843, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100130
Zimmerhackel,J.S., et al. (2023). A framework for the integrated assessment of social and economic values associated with man-made marine structures. Marine Policy, 152, 105612.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Vocational Education Studies (JOVES) agree to the following terms: Authors retain the copyright and grant the Universitas Ahmad Dahlan right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Universitas Ahmad Dahlan. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Universitas Ahmad Dahlan. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.png)
