Peer Review Process
Jurnal REKSA: Rekayasa Keuangan, Syariah, dan Audit applies a double-blind peer review process for each manuscript which involves editors and at least two reviewers. The decision of the article to be published in the journal considers several factors such as the relevance of the article and its contribution to the development of accounting practices and accounting profession as well as compliance with the requirement of a published article. Editors and reviewers provide evaluation and constructive suggestions for the author.
The review process in Jurnal REKSA: Rekayasa keuangan, Syariah, dan Audit consists of the following stages, in which the editor will provide a decision on each stage.
- An initial review by the editor
- Double-blind peer review process at least two reviewer
- Final review by editor
REKSA is committed to providing timely editorial decisions while maintaining a rigorous peer review process. To support authors and reduce uncertainty, the journal follows a two-stage initial decision process. Within 1–2 weeks of submission, authors are informed whether their manuscript is desk rejected or proceeds to the next stage (with resubmission if needed). Manuscripts that pass this initial assessment are then sent for peer review, and authors can expect the first full editorial decision (acceptance, minor revision, major revision, or rejection) within approximately 2–4 weeks. Through this process, REKSA aims to offer a fair, efficient, and transparent publication experience for all authors.
