Analysis of regional growth center and hinterland in Bantul regency

Authors

  • Alivia Rianti Putri University of Islamic Indonesia
  • Unggul Priyadi Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/optimum.v14i2.9974

Keywords:

Regional growth center, Hinterland, Scalogram analysis, Gravity analysis

Abstract

Increasing regional economic efficiency can be done through accelerated regional growth. Growth acceleration is known to produce two groups of regions, namely the growth center and Hinterland (supporting areas). This study aims to analyze the sub-districts that become growth centers and determine the value of community interaction between regions in Bantul Regency through comparative data in 2020 and 2022. In this study, secondary data is obtained through BPS Bantul Regency, which includes data, government facilities, education facilities, health facilities, worship facilities, economic facilities, communication facilities, tourism facilities, population, and distance between sub-districts. The analysis method used in this research is scalogram and gravity analysis, which was processed using Microsoft Excel. The results of the scaling analysis show that in 2020, there are five regional growth centers in Bantul Regency, which include Kasihan Subdistrict, Sewon Subdistrict, Banguntapan Subdistrict, Jetis Subdistrict, and Bambanglipuro Subdistrict. Meanwhile, in 2022, the scaling analysis shows that there are five regional growth centers in Bantul Regency, which include Banguntapan Sub-district, Sewon Sub-district, Jetis Sub-district, Kasihan Sub-district, and Kretek Sub-district. Then, the results of the gravity analysis show that there are different interaction values. The research results show that local governments need to prioritize the development of sub-districts that are still Hinterland by the RPJMD of Bantul Regency.

References

Alataş, S. (2023). Revisiting the Solow growth model: new empirical evidence on the convergence debate. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 39(4), 801-817. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-02-2021-0035

Anderson, J. E. (2010). The gravity model (NBER Working Paper 16576). https://doi.org/10.3386/w16576

Aniket, K. (2021). Role of infrastructure in the solow growth model. University College London, August, 1-31.

Azadi, A., Delangizan, S., & Falahati, A. (2021). The role of governments in Iran regional development (case study : tenth government) 1. Iranian Economic Review, 25(1), 1-20.

Baniya, S., Rocha, N., & Ruta, M. (2020). Trade effects of the New Silk Road : A gravity analysis. Journal of Development Economics, 146(January 2019), 102467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102467

Bekker-nielsen, T. (2020). The Roman city as a central place. Wiley

Gervais, A., & Jensen, J. B. (2019). The tradability of services : Geographic concentration and trade costs. Journal of International Economics, 118, 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.03.003

Giannakis, E., & Bruggeman, A. (2020). Regional disparities in economic resilience in the European Union across the urban-rural divide. Regional Studies, 54(9), 1200-1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1698720

Guo, T., Liu, P., Wang, C., Xie, J., Du, J., & Lim, M. K. (2023). Toward sustainable port-hinterland transportation: A holistic approach to design modal shift policy mixes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103746

Iskandar, A., & Saragih, R. (2018). Analisis kondisi kesenjangan ekonomi daerah : studi kasus kabupaten/kota di Sulawesi Selatan. Info Artha, 2(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.31092/jia.v2i1.232

Isyandi, B., & Trihatmoko, R. A. (2022). An analysis of regional economic performance of Riau on the capital expenditure budget: a study of Indonesian territorial economics. International Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research, 9(2), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.18488/74.v9i2.3024

Kazancik, L. Bi̇. (2023). Synthesis of central place theory with network models : Determining functional areas in Türki̇ye. Journal of Regional Development, 1(1), 83-103.

Klapka, P., & Erlebach, M. (2021). The contribution of spatial interaction modelling to spatial history: The case of central places and their hinterlands in the territory of the Austro-Hungarian empire. Moravian Geographical Reports, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2021-0019

Naftaly, G. M. (2021). Determinants of regional economic growth in Kenya. African Journal of Business Management, 15(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2020.9118

Nijkamp, P., & Ratajczak, W. (2021). Gravitational analysis in regional science and spatial economics: A vector gradient approach to trade. International Regional Science Review, 44(3-4), 400-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017620980519

Nitsche, B. (2021). Embracing the potentials of intermodal transport in ethiopia: Strategies to facilitate export-led growth. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042208

Noviyanti, D., Emma Pravitasari, A., & Sahara, S. (2020). Analisis perkembangan wilayah provinsi Jawa Barat untuk arahan pembangunan berbasis wilayah pengembangan. Jurnal Geografi, 12(01), 280. https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v12i01.14799

Nurlina, N., & Ginting, A. R. B. (2018). Analisis identifikasi pusat-pusat pertumbuhan dan wilayah pendukungnya dalam pengembangan wilayah Aceh. Jurnal Samudra Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 9(1), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.33059/jseb.v9i1.462

Priyadi, U., & Atmadji, E. (2017). identifikasi pusat pertumbuhan dan wilayah hinterland di provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Ajie, 2(2), 193-219. https://doi.org/10.20885/ajie.vol2.iss2.art9

Putra, D. A. W., Rusda, D., & Aziz, A. (2020). Analisis penentuan pusat-pusat pertumbuhan (Growth Pole) dan wilayah belakang (Hinterland) Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Ecoplan, 3(2), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.20527/ecoplan.v3i2.161

Rosés, J. R., & Wolf, N. (2021). Regional growth and inequality in the long-run: Europe, 1900-2015. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 37(1), 17-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa062

Sari, M. (2021). Kajian pusat pertumbuhan dan wilayah hinterland di kabupaten Siak. JPS, 3(2), 69-78.

Schiller, G., Bimesmeier, T., & Pham, A. T. V. (2020). Method for quantifying supply and demand of construction minerals in urban regions-A case study of hanoi and its Hinterland. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114358

Sitepu, V. V., & Rahmawati, F. (2022). Analisis pusat pertumbuhan dan sektor ekonomi dalam mengurangi ketimpangan pendapatan. Akuntabel, 19(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.30872/jakt.v19i1.10710

Sumartini, & Muta'ali, L. (2015). analisis perkembangan ekonomi wilayah di kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Bumi Indonesia, 4(3), 287-301.

Taha, R., Al-Harthy, A., Al-Shamsi, K., & Al-Zubeidi, M. (2002). Cement stabilization of reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregate for road bases and subbases. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 14(3), 239-245. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(239)

Utoyo, B. (2009). Geografi Membuka Cakrawala Dunia. Setia Purna Inves.

Wahyudin, Y. (2022). Analisis desa/kelurahan pusat pertumbuhan wilayah sekitar calon ibu kota negara Indonesia. Forum Ekonomi, 24(1), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.30872/jfor.v24i1.10448

Wijaya, A., Darma, S., & Darma, D. C. (2020). Spatial interaction between regions: Study of the East Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 15(6), 937-950. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.150618

Yusliana, & Devi, M. K. (2020). Interaksi wilayah pusat pertumbuhan melalui pendekatan skalogram dan gravitasi di wilayah pesisir Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Geodika: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Dan Pendidikan Geografi, 4(2), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.29408/geodika.v4i2.2721

Downloads

Published

2024-10-02

Issue

Section

Articles