Mitigation of regional poverty in East Kalimantan: A village level panel data analysis

Authors

  • Lukman Hakim Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Selfia Bintariningtyas Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Aulia Hapsari Juwita Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Mulyanto Mulyanto Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/optimum.v14i2.8691

Keywords:

Poverty, Institution, Demography, Technology

Abstract

Poverty is a specific problem so that programs that pay attention to spatial or demographic aspects are crucial to being able to create programs that are right on target in alleviating poverty. Apart from looking at demographic factors, we also analyze technological and institutional factors. This research aims to develop a Regional Poverty Mitigation Model in the province of East Kalimantan. This model is designed to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding and addressing poverty in the region. The focus of this research is specifically on the problem of poverty in the province of East Kalimantan. The data used in this study is the latest data from the 2021 Village Potential (Podes) of East Kalimantan province, which includes 1039 villages. The method used in this study is a quantitative analysis method using panel data which is then performed regression. The results show that geographical variables (regional areas and bordering the sea) have a negative and significant relationship to poverty in East Kalimantan, and technology has a positive and significant relationship to poverty in East Kalimantan. In addition, institutions (health and education) have a positive and significant relationship to poverty in East Kalimantan.

References

Arouri, M., Youssef, A. Ben, & Nguyen, C. (2017). Does urbanization reduce rural poverty? Evidence from Vietnam. Economic Modelling, 60, 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.09.022

Asongu, S. A., & Kodila-Tedika, O. (2018). Institutions and poverty: A critical comment based on evolving currents and debates. Social Indicators Research, 139(1), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1709-y

Az zakiyyah, N. A., Lubis, F. R. A., & Wahyuni, I. (2023). Determinants of poverty in Indonesia. Eko-Regional: Jurnal Pembangunan Ekonomi Wilayah, 18(2), 210-222.

Belantika, B. T., Rohmad, B., Arandita, H. D. N., Hutasoit, D. R., & Kartiasih, F. (2023). Factors affecting poverty using a geographically weighted regression approach (case study of Java Island, 2020). Optimum: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 13(2), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.12928/optimum.v13i2.7993

Diga, K., Nwaiwu, F., & Plantinga, P. (2013). ICT policy and poverty reduction in Africa. Info, 15(5), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1108/info-05-2013-0032

Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic Econometrics (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Inc.

Inayatsyah, B., & Zulham, T. (2019). Evaluasi dan efektivitas alokasi dana desa (ADD) dalam pengurangan kemiskinan di Kabupaten Bener Meriah. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa (JIM) Ekonomi Pembangunan Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Unsyiah, 4(2), 175-183.

Ipinnaiye, O., & Olaniyan, F. (2023). An exploratory study of local social innovation initiatives for sustainable poverty reduction in Nigeria. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 2222-2239. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2502

Ishartono, S. T. R. (2019). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) dan pengentasan kemiskinan. Social Work Jurnal, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24198/share.v6i2.13198

Niu, K., & Xu, H. (2024). Does urban-rural integration reduce rural poverty? Agribusiness, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21935

Ochi, A., Labidi, M. A., & Saidi, Y. (2024). The xexus between pro-poor growth, inequality, institutions and poverty: Evidence from low and middle income developing countries. Social Indicators Research, 172(2), 703-739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-024-03326-7

Purwono, R., Wardana, W. W., & Haryanto, T. (2021). Poverty dynamics in Indonesia: Empirical evidence from three main approaches. World Development Perspectives, 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2021.100346

Putri, M. H., & Yuhan, R. J. (2020). Indeks kerawanan sosial ekonomi perempuan Indonesia tahun 2017. Seminar Nasional Official Statistics, 2019(1), 286-296. https://doi.org/10.34123/semnasoffstat.v2019i1.117

Rozaini, N., Damira, R., Tanjung, N. A., Ismail, P. R., & Syafira, D. A. (2023). Pengaruh kenaikan harga BBM terhadap angka kemiskinan masyarakat di kelurahan Mabar Hilir lingkungan IV Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 5(1), 2075-2079. https://doi.org/10.47233/jemb.v1i2.676

Sharma, A., Dean, B. P., & Bezjian, J. (2024). Reducing poverty by digitization: what role do information and communication technologies (ICTs) play in reducing poverty? Journal of Strategy and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-06-2023-0129

Smajgl, A., & Bohensky, E. (2013). Behaviour and space in agent-based modelling: Poverty patterns in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Environmental Modelling and Software, 45, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.10.014

Suripto, Sukarniati, L., Khasanah, U., Kurniawan, M. L. A., & Istanti. (2024). The role of invesment for poverty alleviation in Yogyakarta: Evidence from logit regression. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 25(1), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.v25i1.21060

Taufiq, M. (2020). Pemindahan ibu kota dan potensi konektivitas pemerataan ekonomi. Jurnal Vokasi Indonesia, 8(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.7454/jvi.v8i1.156

Thane, P. (2024). Poverty and the rise and fall of the welfare state in Britain, 1900 to the present. Society, 61(3), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-024-00976-8

Tian, J., Sui, C., Zeng, S., & Ma, J. (2024). Spatial differentiation characteristics, driving mechanisms, and governance strategies of rural poverty in Eastern Tibet. Land, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/land13070978

World Bank. (2001). World Development Report 2000/2001 Attacking Poverty.

Zhao, L. (2021). Tourism, institutions and poverty alleviation: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Travel Research, 60(7), 1543-1565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520947792

Downloads

Published

2024-10-02

Issue

Section

Articles