Blockchain acceptance and deployment: A catalyst for microeconomic stability with financial performance as a mediator

Authors

  • Komang Widhya Sedana Putra P Universitas Pendidikan Nasional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/optimum.v15i1.10397

Keywords:

Blockchain technology, Microeconomic stability, Financial performance, Regulatory environment

Abstract

The study assesses blockchain technology acceptance and diffusion with its resultant impact on microeconomic stability, mediated by financial performance. It highlights blockchain's role in enhancing efficiency, transparency, and security, potentially increasing microeconomic stability. The questionnaires were administered to SME managers on the Indodax exchange platform, grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) framework and Trade-off theory.  Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) used for data analysis to establish the relationship among blockchain acceptance and deployment, financial performance, and microeconomic stability. The results indicated a significant positive consequence of blockchain acceptance and deployment on the financial performance of companies. Financial performance acted as the mediating variable between blockchain acceptance and deployment and microeconomic stability. Managerial implications show that commitment from top leadership, risk management, and stakeholder engagement are crucial for sustainable blockchain acceptance and deployment. This work elaborates on how blockchain technology can strengthen microeconomic stability and improve financial performance by providing practical guidance for organizations. However, it excludes considerations of operational costs, license fees, government regulations, cold chain management integration, demographic diversity, geographic expansion, alternative variables, sustainability, Bitcoin mining, longitudinal data collection, theoretical advantages for SMEs, supply chain efficiency, specific fintech subsectors, interoperability, scalability, macroeconomic variables, or ownership identity impacts. Despite these gaps, this research remains instrumental by providing foundational insights into the beneficial impacts of blockchain technology on financial performance and microeconomic stability, highlighting key areas for future investigation and guiding practice for current and potential adopters.

References

Abbasi, A. Z., Qummar, H., Bashir, S., Aziz, S., & Ting, D. H. (2024). Customer engagement in Saudi food delivery apps through social media marketing: Examining the antecedents and consequences using PLS-SEM and NCA. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104001

Al-Dmour, A., Al-Dmour, R., Al-Dmour, H., & Al-Adwan, A. (2024). Blockchain applications and commercial bank performance: The mediating role of AIS quality. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100302

Al-Maskari, A., Al Riyami, T., & Ghnimi, S. (2024). Factors affecting students' preparedness for the fourth industrial revolution in higher education institutions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(1), 246-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2022-0169

Al-Swidi, A. K., Al-Hakimi, M. A., Al Halbusi, H., Al Harbi, J. A., & Al-Hattami, H. M. (2024). Does blockchain technology matter for supply chain resilience in dynamic environments? The role of supply chain integration. PLoS ONE, 19(1 January), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295452

Alshehri, E. (2023). English as a Foreign Language Teachers' Acceptance of Using Blackboard Collaborate Ultra in Higher Education. World Journal of English Language, 14(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n2p90

Amidu, M. (2007). Determinants of capital structure of banks in Ghana : an empirical approach. Baltic Journal of Management, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/17465260710720255

Ariani, R. S., Negara, T. A. S., & Masykur, M. H. (2024). The legal position of the use of blockchain technology on the validity of stamp duty in the digital age. Negrei: Academic Journal of Law and Governance, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.29240/negrei.v4i1.10294

Artha, D. R. P., & Dartanto, T. (2014). Multidimensional approach to poverty measurement in Indonesia. LPEM-FEUI Working Paper, 002, 1-17.

Briozzo, A., Vigier, H., & Martinez, L. B. (2016). Firm-Level Determinants of the Financing Decisions of Small and Medium Enterprises: Evidence from Argentina. Latin American Business Review, 17(3), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2016.1209081

Carlson, K. (2018). The Nakamoto Blockchain.

Ciaian, P., Cupak, A., Fessler, P., & Kancs, d'Artis. (2024). Environmental and social attitudes and investments in crypto-assets. Applied Economics, 00(00), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2297742

Cui, Z., Liu, X., Feng, Z., & Huang, Z. (2024). Blockchain Adoption for Generic Drugs in the Medicine Supply Chain with Consumers' Risk-Aversion: A Game-Theoretic Model Within Chinese Legal Framework. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 17(January), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S444026

Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092

Fantazzini, D. (2023). Assessing the Credit Risk of Crypto-Assets Using Daily Range Volatility Models. Information (Switzerland), 14(5), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14050254

Hair, H., Jr, F. J., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624

Hasan, H. F., Bin Yusoff, M. N., & Abd Ali, S. M. (2024). Bitcoin Layer Two Scaling Solutions: Lightening Payment Channels Network Comprehensive Review, Mechanisms, Challenges, Open Issues and Future Research Directions. Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics, 5(1), 25-59.

Iqbal, F., Zahid, M., & Koutmos, D. (2023). Cryptocurrency Trading and Downside Risk. Risks, 11(7), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11070122

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Suman, R., & Khan, S. (2022). A review of blockchain technology applications for financial services. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standard and Evaluations, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2022.100073

Li, C., Yang, T., & Shi, Y. (2023). Blockchain Adoption and Organic Subsidy in an Agricultural Supply Chain Considering Market Segmentation. Mathematics, 12(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12010106

Lu, Y. H., Yeh, C. C., & Kuo, Y. M. (2024). Exploring the critical factors affecting the adoption of blockchain: Taiwan's banking industry. Financial Innovation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00523-0

Mbaidin, H. O., Alomari, K. M., Almubydeen, I. O., & Sbaee, N. Q. (2024). The critical success factors (CSF) of blockchain technology effecting excel performance of banking sector: Case of UAE Islamic Banks. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.9.024

Nagy, S., Molnár, L., & Papp, A. (2024). Customer Adoption of Neobank Services from a Technology Acceptance Perspective - Evidence from Hungary. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 7(1), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame712024883

Nguyen, T. T. Le, Mac, Y. T. H., Nguyen, M. T. H., & Bui, V. T. H. (2024). Assessing determinants of tax officials' intention to continue applying e-tax in Vietnam: Attitude toward the continued application of e-tax as a mediator. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 569-584. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.8.027

Noor, B. D., Katheeth, Z. D., & Noor, A. D. (2024). Internet of things in public healthcare organizations: the mediating role of attitude. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 13(1), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v13.i1.pp57-65

Ongore, V. O., & Kusa, G. B. (2013). Determinants of financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(1), 237-252.

Ozdurak, C., Umut, A., & Ozay, T. (2022). The Interaction of Major Crypto-assets, Clean Energy, and Technology Indices in Diversified Portfolios. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(2), 480-490. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.12888

Purwaningsih, E., Muslikh, Suhaeri, & Basrowi. (2024). Utilizing blockchain technology in enhancing supply chain efficiency and export performance, and its implications on the financial performance of SMEs. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 449-460. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.9.007

Sadiq, M., Aysan, A. F., & Kayani, U. N. (2023). Digital currency and blockchain security in accelerating financial stability: A mediating role of credit supply. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(6), 1251-1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2023.09.009

Shahzad, K., Helo, P., Ranta, M., & Nousiainen, E. (2024). Blockchain technology for operational excellence and supply chain resilience: a framework based on use cases and an architecture demonstration. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2024.2304698

Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., Lim, W. M., Hasnain, M. F., & Nusrat, S. (2024). Cryptocurrency awareness, acceptance, and adoption: the role of trust as a cornerstone. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02528-7

Shwedeh, F. (2024). Harnessing digital issue in adopting metaverse technology in higher education institutions: Evidence from the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 489-504. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.9.007

Sugiarto, R. M., & Iskandar, D. A. (2023). Technology improvement and Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) on regional development in special region of Yogyakarta. Optimum: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 13(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.12928/optimum.v13i1.3829

Swan, M. (2017). Anticipating the Economic Benefits of Blockchain. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(10), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1109

Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution : How the technology bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. In Penguin Random House.

van der Linden, T., & Shirazi, T. (2023). Markets in crypto-assets regulation: Does it provide legal certainty and increase adoption of crypto-assets? Financial Innovation, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00432-8

Xie, P., Md Kassim, A. A., Wei, M., & Abbas Helmi, R. A. (2023). The Impact of Blockchain Adoption on Financial Performance in Fintech Firms: A Review of The Literature. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 11(2), 302-305. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v11i2.12627

Yang, K., Choi, J. G., & Chung, J. (2021). Extending the technology acceptance model (Tam) to explore customer's behavioral intention to use self-service technologies (ssts) in chinese budget hotels. Global Business and Finance Review, 26(1), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2021.26.1.79

Zeitun, R., & Tian, G. G. (2007). Capital Structure and Corporate Performance : Evidence From Jordan. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 1(4), 40-61. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v1i4.3

Downloads

Published

2025-01-28

Issue

Section

Articles