Training and development of learning devices in the digital era at Asy-Syadzili junior high school Pakis Malang

Authors

  • Lilik Sri Hariani Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang
  • Endah Andayani Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/jpm.v5i2.5251

Keywords:

Learning tools, Learning media, Digital era

Abstract

The teaching and learning process is the core of educational activities in schools. There is an interaction between educators and students in the teaching and learning process. Good learning is possible to produce good graduates as well. The service was carried out at Asy-Syadzili Junior High School, Sumberpasir, Pakis, Malang Regency, which involved 31 teachers. Based on the results of the training preparation of learning devices in the digital era at Asy-Syadzili Junior High School, we can conclude that 85.7% of teachers understand the learning tools in accordance with the applicable curriculum; 71.4% of teachers can prepare lesson plans in the digital era; 57.1% of teachers are able to make IT-based learning media, and 57.1% of teachers are able to implement the plans and media that have been made in learning.

References

A. Szymkowiak, B. Melović, M. Dabić, K. Jeganathan, and G. S. Kundi, “Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people,” Technol. Soc., vol. 65, p. 101565, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565

T. H. Morris and M. Rohs, “The potential for digital technology to support self-directed learning in formal education of children: a scoping review,” Interact. Learn. Environ., pp. 1–14, 2021. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1870501

X. Eryong and J. Li, “What is the ultimate education task in China? Exploring ‘strengthen moral education for cultivating people’(‘Li De Shu Ren’),” Educ. Philos. Theory, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 128–139, 2021. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1754539

A. Dimitriadou, N. Djafarova, O. Turetken, M. Verkuyl, and A. Ferworn, “Challenges in serious game design and development: Educators’ experiences,” Simul. Gaming, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 132–152, 2021. doi: 10.1177/1046878120944197

A. Swan Sein, H. Rashid, J. Meka, J. Amiel, and W. Pluta, “Twelve tips for embedding assessment for and as learning practices in a programmatic assessment system,” Med. Teach., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 300–306, 2021. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1789081

M. B. Ressler, C. Apantenco, L. Wexler, and K. King, “Preservice Teachers’ Mental Health: Using Student Voice to Inform Pedagogical, Programmatic, and Curricular Change,” Action Teach. Educ., pp. 1–17, 2022. doi: 10.1080/01626620.2021.1997832

L. Jensen and F. Konradsen, “A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1515–1529, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0

M. Hamadi, J. El-Den, S. Azam, and N. Sriratanaviriyakul, “Integrating social media as cooperative learning tool in higher education classrooms: An empirical study,” J. King Saud Univ. Inf. Sci., 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.12.007

N. Kaso, M. Mariani, D. Ilham, F. Firman, N. Aswar, and M. Iksan, “The Principal’s Leadership: How to Improve the Quality of Teaching and Learning Process in State Junior High School of Luwu,” J. Ad’ministrare, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 49–58, 2021. doi: 10.26858/ja.v8i1.19126

Downloads

Published

2022-01-21

Issue

Section

Articles